34723 réponses à ce sujet

[Colonelkillabee]

ISTP.. the criminal version of ISTJ. 

Ah ok, I was off by a letter This makes sense, sometimes people give off their secondary as their primary in public, as do I. I'm INTP. I'd say that's why we're similar but Ventus is INTP too and we're rather different.

[Cespar]

PS: Don't ever come to Florida. This heat is a killer.

I always thought Cassandra's eyes were like a dark hazel.

[Siha]

I do feel as though I need to ask exactly how I'm reminiscent of Einstein, beyond the INTP labeling. I don't know much about him beyond his work, but I do know that he had a lot of sex with a lot of women.

 

I'm sorry, I was being ironic. Nothing I know of Einstein reminds me of you. But I thought you'd like to hear it because you pointed it out.

[Colonelkillabee]

INTPs don't work with their hands or concrete subjects right away... they're kind of eggheads.. wrapped up in theories. Not necesarily Einstein. They could have a theory of anything. Even dating. Or playing cards. But it's usually thought up before practice. The ISTP is trial by error.

Yep, I work with my hands a lot, building stuff, but I spend a lot more time thinking about it well and good before I do it. Same with writing, same with interacting with others, same with everything really. Gaming too. When making a new character for a run, it might be weeks before I actually make it, because I'm still thinking about the roleplay and background for them and all that jazz.

[o Ventus]

PS: Don't ever come to Florida. This heat is a killer.
 

 

Only when it's humid.

 

Which is all year long, except for winter.

 

INTPs don't work with their hands or concrete subjects right away... they're kind of eggheads.. wrapped up in theories. Not necesarily Einstein. They could have a theory of anything. Even dating. Or playing cards. But it's usually thought up before practice. The ISTP is trial by error.

 

I'm assuming you mean "theories" in the more common layman's use and not the scientific use. If that's the case, then no. The T in INTP is short for "thinking", meaning that more credence is given to objective reasoning and evidence.

[Siha]

But I struggle with being as sensitive and considerate like ISFPs are.. so I don't type myself that way.

 

From my extensive knowledge and in-depth insight in your character I must say I wouldn't type you ISFP either.

[Cespar]

Loves it, no, but this is a woman who told you "She knows what she is" or what she seems like. She thinks that men wouldn't typically go for a woman like her, and looking at the reaction to her from fans early on, she's probably right unfortunately.

Anyway, I think she just enjoys the attention occasionally. She does seem to in some of the banter. Unfortunately, too many people take some flirting, onesided flirting, and her not stabbing him outright as a sign of her wanting to ride the bull.

That isn't directed to you Cespar, or anyone in particular. Didn't go through all the posts, busy writing.

Anyway, what's your type Street? My guess is ISTJ. True at all?

Yea I was talking about the attention. It could be coming from any men, because like you said, she doesn't think men would even want a woman like her. Some men like to be stronger than their wife/girlfriend. Just look at all the stay at home moms, but occasionally, I've met stay at home dads. Aveline seemed to be very confident about men, but she was a tad bit awkward, while on the other side of the spectrum, we have Cassandra who thinks her status as a warrior will make men think twice about approaching her. So with Iron Bull being the only man that flirts with her, she probably thinks that there's a chance for her.Cassandra had only loved one man before, and she's pushing into her 40s, so that alone could be why she would welcome the attention of a little flirt action.

[o Ventus]

No, the functions all work off of each other. Especially the first two. Ti (introverted thinking) is shared with ISTP. But ISTP has Se (extroverted sensing) and INTP has Ne (extroverted intuition). The Intuition lends more to brainstorming and theorizing. The Se just gets it's hands dirty first. Stereotypically -- and this isn't always true - but the INTP probably relished in more thought experiments and imagination as a kid. A lot of ISTPs are athletes or get in a lot of trouble in general, getting their hands dirty in the wrong ways. And half of us are drop outs, while the INTPs end up with high IQs and sticking in school. They're comfortable in just thought.

That's not what I was saying. What I was getting at was this:

 

http://changingminds...ing_feeling.htm

 

Thinking as opposed to feeling.

[Cespar]

That's fair enough..

I still think it's handled badly though. He's stereotypical lecherous, not even flirting or showing attention.. but objectifying her first. First comment out of his mouth is about her breasts. He's got no class. Just like most meatheads who amuse themselves at everyone's expense.

Yea I guess I see where you're coming from. He probably isn't the first kind of man she would want attention from, especially in that way.

But I'll say this, at least he knows she's a woman, and not just armor. Cassandra said (paraphrasing) that men see a warrior first.

[o Ventus]

You're definitely not a feeling type, if you thought I meant that. I can see that easily. I almost think you could ISTP as well.

 

Sensing and Intuition differences is more about how you build patterns, gather data at first. 

I don't think I'd be a very good ISTP. I do see a handful of shared traits, but overall, I can't say I agree, because I don't share just as many.

 

They enjoy exploring new things, and can become bored with repetitiveness and routine. They can also be closet daredevils who gravitate toward fast-moving or risky hobbies (such as bungee jumping, hang gliding, racing, motorcycling, and skydiving), recreational sports (such as downhill skiing, paintball, ice hockey, and scuba diving), and careers (such as aviation and firefighting).

 

 

ISTPs may sometimes seem to act without regard for procedures, directions, protocol, or even their own safety. But while their approach may seem haphazard, it is in fact based on a broad store of knowledge developed over time through action and keen observation. ISTPs enjoy self-sufficiency and take pride in developing their own solutions to problems.

 

 

ISTPs can often be a frustration to their friends or partners due to a propensity to ignore everyone while deeply absorbed in a task. The ISTP should be careful that they do not cause offence by this seeming aloofness, as it could have a negative impact on otherwise great relationships.

 

Repetition doesn't really bother me, so long as what I'm doing isn't mind-numbingly tedious, and I'm certainly not a closet daredevil. I do enjoy some risky or fast-paced activities (auto racing, paintball/airsoft), but generally speaking I prefer to be in a calmer and quieter area. I also never consciously disregard rules or protocol while I work, in fact I almost go out of my way to adhere to them in the workspace. I can't really say that I've ever been a frustration to friends or partners due to ignoring them while I work, either. If I'm busy doing something and someone came up to me to say something, I would continue working but I would also listen as best I could.

 

Also f**k the site formatting. Why it won't let me group those 3 paragraphs in one quote block is beyond me.

[Colonelkillabee]

Here's a question, what do you think Cassandra is? I think Cass would be an ISTJ.

 

http://www.16persona...stj-personality

 

The ISTJ personality type is thought to be the most abundant, making up around 13% of the population. Their defining characteristics of integrity, practical logic and tireless dedication to duty make ISTJs a vital core to many families, as well as organizations that uphold traditions, rules and standards, such as law offices, regulatory bodies and military. People with the ISTJ personality type enjoy taking responsibility for their actions, and take pride in the work they do - when working towards a goal, ISTJs hold back none of their time and energy completing each relevant task with accuracy and patience.

 

ISTJs don't make many assumptions, preferring instead to analyze their surroundings, check their facts and arrive at practical courses of action. ISTJ personalities are no-nonsense, and when they've made a decision, they will relay the facts necessary to achieve their goal, expecting others to grasp the situation immediately and take action. ISTJs have little tolerance for indecisiveness, but lose patience even more quickly if their chosen course is challenged with impractical theories, especially if they ignore key details - if challenges becomes time-consuming debates, ISTJs can become noticeably angry as deadlines tick nearer.

[Siha]

it can get too much into stereotype. When it's more about our general preferences and comfort zone.

 

I'm so glad you say that. Because people get far too much hung up about those types. I might be classified as INTJ but I still share many traits with other types. Nobody is just one thing and one thing always. It's just an indicator but no complete characterization.

[o Ventus]

Fair enough. I was kind of just throwing it out there because you knew plenty of details about swords yesterday. And it seemed like it was based more on experience. But INTPs are prevented from that either. That's always the danger of MBTI... it can get too much into stereotype. When it's more about our general preferences and comfort zone.

 

I just think weaponry is interesting, whether it be swords, axes, guns, knives, really anything. 

 

That said, I would never want to fight someone with a sword. I'd feel more comfortable in a firefight, since I don't have bad aim and know how to hit targets.

[Siha]

But don't care for hammers. That's just sick. Crushing damage is nasty. I'd have to really despise someone to consider it.

 

 

(Sorry.)

[o Ventus]

I've always wanted to do that...... *don't judge me*

 

But don't care for hammers. That's just sick. Crushing damage is nasty. I'd have to really despise someone to consider it.

Hammers don't make very good weapons. Not unless the opponent is wearing solid armor, anyway. Even then, old war hammers saw more use on the clawed end of the head rather than the actual hammer side. The hammer is good for giving someone a concussion (or any other serious head injury) through a metal helmet, but not much else. The clawed bit is what dealt the most damage, since it could actually pierce the armor that people wore and deal more obvious damage. Something like Thor's Mjolnir or Thrall's Doomhammer would never see use in battle.