Ce sujet est fermé
Lol. The straight males will have options, that's for sure.
Also there's Viv, make her straight and problem solved. No one is taking Cass away, she will still be available to dudes.
Think can say there's still a problem as most players fear that Cassandra will be available only for dudes.
I'm not just suggesting Sera or anyone should not be available to male inquisitors. I think an all-bisexual system is better than what appears to be Inquisition's system. What I am saying is that if they have to have Sera and another companion be available to only one gender, then they should at least make the rest of the romances available to both genders. In that scenario, straight players who have historically had more options overall, would not actually *lose* any options.
You are suggesting that gay players should have more options than straight players. When the roles were reversed and straight players had more options, gay players were complaining they had less options. It is the exact same thing.
Edit: for some reason I can't get my reply out of the quote. Sorry
Think can say there's still a problem as most players fear that Cassandra will be available only for dudes.
We still don't know. If she's bi, yay. If she's straight, well then. There's Sera (who, thankfully, became very interesting from that info of hers we got)... and probably scribbles or Viv.
My problem is when people say that if Cass is bi, that somehow will mean there won't be options available. Which it doesn't make sense since they will get a straight option (as there is a gay option) and a bi option, no doubt about that.
You are suggesting that gay players should have more options than straight players.
My preferred scenario is that everyone has equal options to the romanceable characters. That's what *should* happen. But it's been confirmed that Sera is only for females and it's highly unlikely that there isn't any equivalent for males. So because *that* much is certain, I believe that the rest of the options should be bisexual so that the most amount of people have the most amount possible of options.
When the roles were reversed and straight players had more options, gay players were complaining they had less options. It is the exact same thing.
Except that straight players would have more options overall in Bioware games in either scenario. I don't think you can seriously say that gay players having one more option than straight players in one Bioware game would make the plight the straight Bioware game players equal to those of gay Bioware game players. It's only true if you take into account only Dragon Age Inquisition, and I see no reason why Inquisiton has to be put on an island all of a sudden, as if it's not part of a continuous series.
Lol. The straight males will have options, that's for sure.
Also there's Viv, make her straight and problem solved. No one is taking Cass away, she will still be available to dudes.
But there are players who want to romance Vivienne with female players as well :/
I just don't see what the problem is with making the remainder of the options bisexual. The fairness argument falls flat when you take in account every other Bioware game. Even Dragon Age 2 had one more romance option (just because there was no sex doesn't mean it's no longer a romance) for straight characters.
@WhoKnows
Sadly they can't please everyone since they went with the set sexuality system.
If i had to choose between Cass or Viv as to whom should be bi, then i'd say Cass. I was pinning for her from the first time i saw her in DA2 and i'll be sad if she's straight.
Damn Gaider, don't take her away from us girls! *shakes fist* 
Ah well, whatever happens, happens.
They already confirmed that there'll be straight, homosexuals and bisexual LI. We knew before Sera's annoucement that there'll be a lesbian LI. A straight male and female LI are practically sure to be in.My preferred scenario is that everyone has equal options to the romanceable characters. That's what *should* happen. But it's been confirmed that Sera is only for females and it's highly unlikely that there isn't any equivalent for males. So because *that* much is certain, I believe that the rest of the options should be bisexual so that the most amount of people have the most amount possible of options.
Except that straight players would have more options overall in Bioware games in either scenario. I don't think you can seriously say that gay players having one more option than straight players in one Bioware game would make the plight the straight Bioware game players equal to those of gay Bioware game players. It's only true if you take into account only Dragon Age Inquisition, and I see no reason why Inquisiton has to be put on an island all of a sudden, as if it's not part of a continuous series.
But there are players who want to romance Vivienne with female players as well :/
I just don't see what the problem is with making the remainder of the options bisexual. The fairness argument falls flat when you take in account every other Bioware game. Even Dragon Age 2 had one more romance option (just because there was no sex doesn't mean it's no longer a romance) for straight characters.
They already confirmed that there'll be straight, homosexuals and bisexual LI. We knew before Sera's annoucement that there'll be a lesbian LI. A straight male and female LI are practically sure to be in.
Really? All I've heard is that Sera is gay and there are differing orientations. They really just should have gone with all bisexual.
Except that straight players would have more options overall in Bioware games in either scenario. I don't think you can seriously say that gay players having one more option than straight players in one Bioware game would make the plight the straight Bioware game players equal to those of gay Bioware game players. It's only true if you take into account only Dragon Age Inquisition, and I see no reason why Inquisiton has to be put on an island all of a sudden, as if it's not part of a continuous series.
Yeah, in order for straight players to be as limited as gay players have been in past games (other than the 100% bi and equal DA2), they would have to have only one possible LI at most. That's never going to happen. I'd never advocate for anybody to get fewer choices--I was one of the few arguing in favor of all-bisexual, which it seemed like most people were against--but even in the unlikely event that gay players got more options than straight ones, it would still never be as unequal for straight people as it has been for queer people in the past.
@WhoKnows
Sadly they can't please everyone since they went with the set sexuality system.
If i had to choose between Cass or Viv as to whom should be bi, then i'd say Cass. I was pinning for her from the first time i saw her in DA2 and i'll be sad if she's straight.
Damn Gaider, don't take her away from us girls! *shakes fist*
Ah well, whatever happens, happens.
All this talk about Cass being straight makes me a sad panda. ;-;
All this talk about Cass being straight makes me a sad panda. ;-;
Same..... i have that feeling she'll eventually be straight but i try to not think too much about it -__-
Really? All I've heard is that Sera is gay and there are differing orientations. They really just should have gone with all bisexual.
Really? All I've heard is that Sera is gay and there are differing orientations. They really just should have gone with all bisexual.
I agree they should have gone the 'everyone is available to anyone' route as well, though I prefer the sexually ambiguous to all bisexual. That way those who want to believe the target of their affection is the orientation they want can.
But no, we have to have the SSSARGS because of things like 'realism' and 'sexuality is an important characteristic'. 
Guest_Danielle100_*
@WhoKnows
Sadly they can't please everyone since they went with the set sexuality system.
If i had to choose between Cass or Viv as to whom should be bi, then i'd say Cass. I was pinning for her from the first time i saw her in DA2 and i'll be sad if she's straight.
Damn Gaider, don't take her away from us girls! *shakes fist*
Ah well, whatever happens, happens.
Didn't the devs already said that they didn't go trough this system for realism?I agree they should have gone the 'everyone is available to anyone' route as well, though I prefer the sexually ambiguous to all bisexual. That way those who want to believe the target of their affection is the orientation they want can.
But no, we have to have the SSSARGS because of things like 'realism' and 'sexuality is an important characteristic'.
Didn't the devs already said that they didn't go trough this system for realism?
I'm talking fans, not devs.
I think the sexuality system is nice
Goodie for you. I don't.
I see, I misunderstood you.I'm talking fans, not devs.
I see, I misunderstood you.
It's okay. 
Speaking of Cassandra, in the case companions have off-duty clothes, what do you guys think Cassandra's will be? I think she might have the red tunic/vest under her armour.
Yea something like that, nothing peppy. Commoners clothes
Speaking of Cassandra, in the case companions have off-duty clothes, what do you guys think Cassandra's will be? I think she might have the red tunic/vest under her armour.
She probably does wear some kind of tunic and leggings while off duty, but I like to think of her in fluffy bunny slippers. Because, reasons.
Cassandra needs fluffy bunny slippers!
She probably does wear some kind of tunic and leggings while off duty, but I like to think of her in fluffy bunny slippers. Because, reasons.
Cassandra needs fluffy bunny slippers!
Just bunny slippers? Come on, go big or go home. She needs an entire bunny outfit.
Like this:
Retour en haut
