Nevermind, I saw the post in question. What really boggles my mind is this:
It's all down to interpretation, I suppose. You see antagonism, we see- well. Varric kind of being a dick, but there still being the possibility of their becoming friends. It's not that far a leap, and it certainly wouldn't be the first time a romance was based on disliking someone, learning that they're not entirely assholes, becoming friends, and then possibly indulging in a relationship.
Thank you though, for presenting your opinions with points that illustrate your feelings on it, rather than dismissing us all as mad.
How could Varric and Cassandra's interaction (on Varric's end, anyway) be seen as anything OTHER than antagonism?
And, I know I've said this before, but people who dislike each other (or at least one disliking the other) don't typically end up being together. If that were ever the case, they wouldn't dislike each other to begin with, with one party throwing out both passive-aggressive and direct insults to the other. I cannot stress how much I detest the "opposites attract" mentality. People aren't magnets, and that sh** doesn't happen in reality. People might not be the best of friends when they hook up, but never does one go out of their way to antagonize the other.
Even ignoring the whole clash of personality there, Varric is still in love with Bianca, and outright says "I'm not into humans". You'd think that one of those two statements alone would kind of shoot the whole idea down, but no, people are really, REALLY stubborn on insisting something that will never happen and has no basis in the narrative.