Since people have mentioned literature and Harry Potter...
Whenever I see someone mention "the classics" in regards to books and literature, it makes me want to blow my brains out for having heard such inanity.
"The classics" are some of the most overblown, archaic, and boring pieces of literature I've ever read. I'd gladly read Harry Potter over War and Peace, just like how I'll always ask for Metro 2033 before I even entertain the idea of reading Pride and Prejudice ever again.
I get that people have tastes, and of course opinions are opinions, but I've not met a single person who is a fan of "the classics" who wasn't an uppity "look at me I'm so cultured and well-read! Let me twirl my monocle while condescending down to you from yonder hill!" snob who couldn't tell his foot from his ***hole.
I have a lot of respect for Leo Tolstoy and Shakespeare as authors and as people and will be the first to acknowledge their contribution to the world through their novels and stage plays, but I almost resent them for being made to read their work for 4 years in a row in high school. No 16 or 17 year old gives half a **** about Romeo and Juliet, or The Great Gatsby (which actually isn't a bad story, but seriously, nobody cares to read it in school), or The Scarlet Letter.
Those "great" novels offer a glimpse into life during the era they were written, and for that I'm glad they exist, but god, they are (generally) a chore to go through with the archaic language and presentation, and as a general rule I detest the people who go on about them and prop them up on a pedestal while sneering at any kind of modern literature or media. They were groundbreaking for their day, but they aren't anymore. Like, at all.
Give me Metro, Watchmen, a collection of Fables comics, 11/22/63 (the Stephen King novel), or Roadside Picnic over Othello, Gone With The Wind, or Anna Karenina any day.