34724 réponses à ce sujet

[raging_monkey]

I suppose you could.

Yay XD.. wait im sensing a manners

"May" i have a pm of your character templates XD

[Master Warder Z_]

Yay XD.. wait im sensing a manners

"May" i have a pm of your character templates XD

 

 

Well you already met Dunmak

 

Spoiler

 

After him well i guess i could do what you said;and pm you the others

[The Elder King]

This basically sums up my view of what the circle prevents.
 

I honestly don't understand if you think the circle prevents chaos or Nothing, based on the video.

[lil yonce]

Spoiler

I'm Not sure on that, but it's possible that the intention of Tranquility was To be use only on mages Not capable of controlling their powers, and that using it as a punishment was an abuse of the Rite. As I said, don't quote me on this, I don't recall exactly What she said.

Spoiler

She called it an abuse. And yes! The Seeker Order is going down in flames!   At least in my playthrough. tehehe.

[Master Warder Z_]

I honestly don't understand if you think the circle prevents chaos or Nothing, based on the video.

 

It indicates the circle prevents chaos and the mages are superficial about physical appearance.

[The Elder King]

It indicates the circle prevents chaos and the mages are superficial about physical appearance.

Understood, but I wasn't questioning the Circle system in my posted. I said that the system was affected by Certain things (possibly the one we were talking about), that lead to tensions between the factions and the system to work Not as well as it was supposed To be.
I'm going to bed now. If you want to respond to my post, I'll respond in 6-7 hours .

[Master Warder Z_]

I'm still wondering if you can't influence Cass's world view...what i wouldn't give to shift her to a lawful evil alignment...

[Caramacchiato]

I haven't even played the game yet and I already know what my favourite Cass quote will be:

Spoiler

(Disgusted noise)

[raging_monkey]

I'm still wondering if you can't influence Cass's world view...what i wouldn't give to shift her to a lawful evil alignment...

well i think she's lawful good... but that spectrum can easly be shifted(past exp in DND) so id say its more than possible

[Shadow Fox]

You swear you lot are doing this on purpose.

What'd I do?

[Br3admax]

Seriously i'd be all for Cass actually cementing herself into her actual office.

 

She doesn't need to waffle when it comes to matters of morality, of subjective justice, of something insubstantial like the "truth".

 

o.o

 

I honestly would hate to have to end up killing her.

"Agree with me or die."

 

That does indeed sound like a problem with Cassandra. 

[Master Warder Z_]

"Agree with me or die."

That does indeed sound like a problem with Cassandra.

I know right!

[Bayonet Hipshot]

"Agree with me or die."

 

That does indeed sound like a problem with Cassandra. 

 

Don't think so. If this is the case then if we play as an Inquisitor who is focused on reality as opposed to faith and being a Herald would be thrown out of the Inquisition and Cassandra will really dislike you for it...

 

Cassandra is the type that will, overall, respect you for your actions as well as your viewpoints...If she is the agree with me or die type...then the party composition of Inquisitor, Cassandra, Solas and Cole would not be called Team Morally Respectful Debate...

[Shadow Fox]

Don't think so. If this is the case then if we play as an Inquisitor who is focused on reality as opposed to faith and being a Herald would be thrown out of the Inquisition and Cassandra will really dislike you for it...

 

Cassandra is the type that will, overall, respect you for your actions as well as your viewpoints...If she is the agree with me or die type...then the party composition of Inquisitor, Cassandra, Solas and Cole would not be called Team Morally Respectful Debate...

He's referring to Z's Inquisitor.

 

*I think*

[Bayonet Hipshot]

He's referring to Z's Inquisitor.

 

*I think*

 

Oh...Z is playing as an Assquisitor ? Then I am afraid there is not much romance options for you except perhaps Iron Bull. 

[Inquisitor Julianos]

well i think she's lawful good... but that spectrum can easly be shifted(past exp in DND) so id say its more than possible

Chaotic Good, she's willing to go against laws to get things done, if she was lawful good she would accept the chantries verdict on all things.

[Master Warder Z_]

Chaotic Good, she's willing to go against laws to get things done, if she was lawful good she would accept the chantries verdict on all things.

Didn't she basically do that her entire life?

[Sol Downer]

She's not doing it now; I think, in this case, that matters more than what she did in the past.

[Master Warder Z_]

She's not doing it now

Because the divine died.

[Sol Downer]

It doesn't matter why she stopped doing it, does it? All that matters is that she's changed herself, fundamentally, from her previous views. If we're still talking about lawful good to chaotic good, anyway. If we are, then why she stopped is irrelevant.

[Master Warder Z_]

It doesn't matter why she stopped doing it, does it?

What do you think will happen when the balance is returned?

Is this change or merely adaptation?

Inversely is this reaction or action?

My point is assumption is what drives this belief.

[Sol Downer]

From what I've observed, she is reacting to change. However, as far as I can see, if your original argument goes back to you wanting her to be lawful evil, she would not be able to do so. Fundamental shift in that direction is possible, but assuming what little we know of Cassandra, I don't see it as possible for her to follow the rules set just to act in morally corrupt ways. There might be a reason that causes her to adapt that way, as you've seen with her current change, but I very seriously doubt either chaotic or evil are permanent as far as Cassandra's spectrums of choice go. If this has nothing to do with that, I'm just talking nonsense at 2:32 in the morning.

[MisterJB]

What'd I do?

Oh, don't worry. I'm just trying to avoid spoilers and then you suggested that which as under the tag was positive for pro-mages whereas I AM stauchly pro-Templar thus testing my willpower even further.

[Br3admax]

All I have to say is, what you thought was

(not a spoiler just speaking on your opinion that may giving meaning to the spoiler you didn't read}

Spoiler

unintentional definitely wasn't. They blatantly did it.

[azarhal]

Oh, don't worry. I'm just trying to avoid spoilers and then you suggested that which as under the tag was positive for pro-mages whereas I AM stauchly pro-Templar thus testing my willpower even further.

 

If I said that it wasn't about Cassandra herself, does it make you feel better? Some Cassandra related spoilers just have ramifications.

 

and Br3admax that's not cool, he doesn't want to be spoiled and giving hints is not the way to go.