propably that kicking and screaming regardless they accept the change was the point
Except they didn't. He had to kill a bunch of people, just like anyone else. No one just universally accepts anything.
propably that kicking and screaming regardless they accept the change was the point
Except they didn't. He had to kill a bunch of people, just like anyone else. No one just universally accepts anything.
The Romans didn't just accept Augustus. And there was definitely bloodshed throughout that change. I'm not quite sure what you point is.
Yes, people were sick of the blood shed. After Anthony, what Civil war did Augustus face? Look at how Augustus gained power you twit. Look at how he reinvented himself. How he used the senate and tested how much he could take and told people that they were under a PAX ROMANA. He was not just the first emperor to ever close the doors to the tempal of Janus, sginifying Roman peace, he was the first Roman politician to ever do so. lol
did i say i agreed? You know i play the field lol sides you'd be amazed at what people accept * shrugs* humans right?Accept they didn't. He had to kill a bunch of people, just like anyone else. No one just universally accepts anything.
Except they didn't. He had to kill a bunch of people, just like anyone else. No one just universally accepts anything.
Yes, people were sick of the blood shed. After Anthony, what Civil war did Augustus face?
After Anthony implies this was not a part of August forcing change which it definitely is. No one. Literally no one, in human history just ups and does anything. Caesar built the ground works for many of these changes long before Octavian became Romes emperor.
Look at how Augustus gained power you twit. Look at how he reinvented himself. How he used the senate and tested how much he could take and told people that they were under a PAX ROMANA. He was not just the first emperor to ever close the doors to the tempal of Janus, sginifying Roman peace, he was the first Roman politician to ever do so. lol
He still had to fight wars and earn his power. People died. Bloodshed acquired. He did not have people peacefully talk together until they accepted one another. Even then Roman society was divided, and remained so long after his death. Leliana does not. She simply becomes Divine, changes absolutely nothing about anything, and forces reform. Do not compare them.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Dudes.
Rome is TWO Seasons long. It doesn't just start at Season 2 with Octavius. ![]()
Seriously though. You can't just argue about Augustus' relatively benign reign, without talking about who and what prepared the way.
For the love of the Maker, can we bring it back to Cass?
Spoiler
I won't debate she talked with people. It's too radical a change for simple talks imo. You're asking for people to accept abominations and randomly get over thousands of years of bigotry in one go. Take any problem from our world and add magic. Would you accept such change because the Divine smiled at you enough?
yes i sense tension... more than usual XDFor the love of the Maker, can we bring it back to Cass?
Guest_StreetMagic_*
I won't debate she talked with people. It's too radical a change for simple talks imo. You're asking for people to accept abominations and randomly get over thousands of years of bigotry in one go. Take any problem from our world and add magic. Would you accept such change because the Divine smiled at you enough?
Considering that Chantry sisters whisper about banging Iron Bull, and a Dalish miscreant can be Andraste's herald, I don't think any of the writers takes the Chantry seriously anymore. This is just another indication. It's all very hand wavey and chilled out these days.
Kind of like Buddy Jesus in Dogma.
Augustus reign really starts with Julius. Which is bloody and upheaving and changed the status quo in ways to cause war amongst the entire senate.
That is a red herring argumeant. Agustus ended the Roman civil war, he did not become Imperartor Caesar Augustus untill after he defeated Anthony and ended the Civil war. There was in fact the most stabilty Rome had ever experianced (in the Empire) during Augustus' reign. Augustus at that point was the only person left standing, (like the new Devine in DA:I) of any true politcal importance, he was also briliant so that went in his favour as well. The first part of his reign was testing how much power he could take from the state wiithout breaking the stability he wanted. He was very proficent at it. lol Hence why he lived into his 80s. lol
It seems the slide does not suggest that softened Leilanna's reign is a dictatorship or coup, she is just charismatic enough to convince people to go along with the changes.
And we don't know if this is going to change in the next game: always remember the Mage/Dalish Boon
That seems to be the impression, which I suppose is helped by the role she potentially served in ending the Fifth Blight, her role helping Divine Justinia V, and working alongside the Inquisitor in stopping the Breach. Leliana becoming Divine also allows Cassandra to focus on rebuilding the Seekers into the organization that she thinks it should be, presuming the Inquisitor supports her endeavor, or allows her to make the decision on her own.
As for what happens in the next Dragon Age game, I suppose it can simply be referenced if future games explore regions outside of Orlais and Ferelden (which might be why all three contenders end up having the same name when they become the new Divine).
I won't debate she talked with people. It's too radical a change for simple talks imo. You're asking for people to accept abominations and randomly get over thousands of years of bigotry in one go. Take any problem from our world and add magic. Would you accept such change because the Divine smiled at you enough?
I respect this response and understand the point you're making. I like that at the very end of the narration for Leliana's ending the narrator says "For now..." as if to foreshadow that all is not as well off as that slide would have it appear.
Edit: All of the choices she makes as Devine do come off of the heels of a Mage/Templar war and the successful defeat of a crazed blighted Tevinter magister with her being known as a prominent figure within the organization responsible for tending to many of the problems that ailed Southern Thedas. One should consider that perhaps a lot of this is why there was no need for further wars or serious conflict (in the immediate future) outside of disagreements in regards to the "dissent" against her reforms.
Finished the game and didn't have Cassandra become Divine, I was stressing so much about that possibility and when it didn't come to pass I was happy. Cassandra is really too adorable.
Cassandra would sooner want to punch things, just for being there. I can't imagine her waking up every day, having all those attendants and brownosers serving her tea, dressing in stupid robes, and then sitting on a chair all day waving and doling out boons and judgements.
It may sound appealing on paper, but the actual reality would blow. After two weeks, she'll start slugging people for no reason.
At least, that's how I want Cass to stay. If the job actually changes her, then it's for the worst. I didn't wait 3 years to play with Cass on a team, only to change her character and lose her.
I went with Vivienne just because she's used to all of the politics, and Cassandra can do more in a hands-on capacity with the Seekers than she can being hamstrung by all of the pomp and circumstance.
What if she's a more active Divine and actually moves around than just sit on a throne ![]()
I took a look at the slides and it seemed like more people were pissed at Vivianne becoming Divine than Leilanna. Leilanna becomes Divine and people threaten to revolt, which she manages to talk down and there's peace - for now. Vivi becomes Divine and there are three immediate revolts which she crushes thanks to the Inquisition. Seems like Vivi's tenure as Divine is a lot more shaky than Leilanna's. Cassandra seems like the 'safe' choice but even then there are people saying she goes to far with the reforms.
Actually there's a lot a hinting in multiple slides that the state of the world we made won't stay peaceful forever.
Ultimately in my opinion, Cassandra is too great a character to lose to the chantry and I feel making her Devine is like killing her potential in the DA universe and specifically in DAI prematurely. It feels as if; with these characters set to potentially take on a role like that they're poised to not show up in any significant capacity soon. My Lavellan romanced her, respected her views on the chantry and on the maker, but just doesn't want her to be Devine of the chantry. Unhardened Leliana as Devine just feels like icing on that cake.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Ultimately in my opinion, Cassandra is too great a character to lose to the chantry and I feel making her Devine is like killing her potential in the DA universe and specifically in DAI prematurely. It feels as if; with these characters set to potentially take on a role like that they're poised to not show up in any significant capacity soon. My Lavellan romanced her, respected her views on the chantry and on the maker, but just doesn't want her to be Devine of the chantry. Unhardened Leliana as Devine just feels like icing on that cake.
Yes, no matter what.. the potential longevity is already lost, even if you don't pick her.
This kind of circumstance takes a lot of excitement out of the game already for me. Like the DAI "experience" is already over, in a sense. The stage for southern Thedas is set.. and the next game may not even be there. I don't know how stoked I'll get next time. I've invested emotionally here.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, Y'ALL.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, Y'ALL.
Sorry ![]()
Her expresion makes it creepy. lol
Spoiler
Spoiler
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Caesar did not reach his hand to foreigners, the only thing that he did with hands and foreigners was to have the right arm (considered the spear arm) cut off of every boy and man in a Gaulic village. You do understand that Augustus was the person who changed the SPQR completly and founded the Empire (14AD), his model lasted until Diocleation's reforms in like the 200s AD. Caesar's true aims (his revolution whatever it would have been) is still left to speculation, that is not true of Augustus who founded an empire and died at the age of 82. lol
"My point is quite simple, Augustus' reign is an example in real history, when there was major change and no revoults. Why? Because Augustus ended the civil war, and the Roman's were sick of gutting each other. Look at the state of Thedas, either the mages or the Templar's have been mutated and destroyed and the chantry hierarchy was blasted to bits. The people closest to that will not want to revoult. If there are problems, it will come from places that were not tuched by the blight, civil war, or the rifts. One cannot see Orlais and Ferelden causing revoults over Leliana's changes, because they have suffered too much to cause more war, over elves in the Chantry."
You say that your argumeant is: "my point is that the changes were already set in motion." Now explain to me how you have not made a red herring?
I don't want to derail further. I'll let you have the last word. But what I was referring to was Caesar trying to make "outsiders" into Roman citizens. Beginning with consolidating Italy into one body (which Augustus finally did later). He also made many of them Senators.
I don't know why you need to use dramatic phrases like "red herring". It's just a minor disagreement on who started social reforms. I can't tell if you're angry or not, but if you are, I'm actually trying to reach out and find some common ground. I already agreed that Augustus was a good leader. What do more do you want?
It's as simple as saying the "Uncle" put the ideas in to the "Nephew's" head. The Nephew didn't dream it up all on his own. He picked up the baton. The Uncle paid the bloody price of revolution however.