34723 réponses à ce sujet

[vertigomez]

Are we all agreed that Cassandra has, like, the best armour designs in this game? Cause she does.
 

 
Sexy. I want it.

[Hellion Rex]

Or you could listen to all of the talk about Rivain being abomination central in Asunder. That works too. They willingly allow themselves to be possessed, and treat abominations like natural disasters. Or are you really one of those, "Well they don't care, so those mages were doing fine?"

You are joking right? The only mention of Rivain in Asunder was the news that Dairsmuid was Annuled. Unless you mean FE Rivella's letter?

[Precursor Meta]

Just did Cassandra's romance and I got to say, it was really beautiful. Kind of reminded me of my first romance back in highschool. There were candles, poetry, but we weren't outside or anything.

Almost shed a tear at the comparisons. Nothing like young love I tell you....

[ximena]

I haven't drawn anything in a while. But that's mostly because I was playing DA:I haha.

 

A work in progress.

 

Spoiler

 

[Br3admax]

You are joking right? The only mention of Rivain in Asunder was the news that Dairsmuid was Annuled. Unless you mean FE Rivella's letter?

It's not like it was annulled because the Templars felt shitty that day. They were allowing themselves to be possessed. Like actual possession, which requires letting the spirit join with you. Eventually anyway. 

[azarhal]

 

(Basically, Cole's banter with Cassandra is him saying she's not a bad person. So she shouldn't feel bad. Haha.)

 

He is always trying to cheer her up.

[Jaison1986]

It's not like it was annulled because the Templars felt shitty that day. They were allowing themselves to be possessed. Like actual possession, which requires letting the spirit join with you. Eventually anyway. 

 

And you are assuming the moment they become possessed they start rampaging the land. Was that the case the seekers wouldn't need to show up for the annulment to happen. The templars could have done it themselves. Apart from your obvious personal bias toward anything that doesn't follow Chantry law to the letter, you don't have any concrete facts to back up your claims.

[MisterJB]

And you are assuming the moment they become possessed they start rampaging the land. Was that the case the seekers wouldn't need to show up for the annulment to happen. The templars could have done it themselves. Apart from your obvious personal bias toward anything that doesn't follow Chantry law to the letter, you don't any concrete facts to back up your claims.

 

No one has even implied that all Seers go on a rampage. However, there are circumstances to take into account.

For one, mages are extremely dangerous to begin with. If you add spirits to the mix, not only do you make the mage more powerful (thus increasing the threat he or she poses) you are also making their minds vulnerable to the corrupting influence of alien beings who can not even comprehend the concept of time and immutability, much less ethics and morals if they enter in conflict with the emotions they embody. Justice and Anders are a perfect example of this.

 

Considering that possession is unnecessary to maintain one's life or mental integrity, if the Seers are as neglectful and uncaring of the safety of both themselves and the citizens of Rivain as to allow mass possessions to occur, then the Templars and Seekers were in the right, both moral and lawful, to demand them cease immediately and comply by the laws of the Circle.

After these terms were refused and the Templars attacked, then the Right of Annulment was the only reasonable answer.

 

Not even the Seekers would ever allow a spirit to possess recruits, at most, it touched their minds only.

[raging_monkey]

No one has even implied that all Seers go on a rampage. However, there are circumstances to take into account.
For one, mages are extremely dangerous to begin with. If you add spirits to the mix, not only do you make the mage more powerful (thus increasing the threat he or she poses) you are also making their minds vulnerable to the corrupting influence of alien beings who can not even comprehend the concept of time and immutability, much less ethics and morals if they enter in conflict with the emotions they embody. Justice and Anders are a perfect example of this.
 
Considering that possession is unnecessary to maintain one's life or mental integrity, if the Seers are as neglectful and uncaring of the safety of both themselves and the citizens of Rivain as to allow mass possessions to occur, then the Templars and Seekers were in the right, both moral and lawful, to demand them cease immediately and comply by the laws of the Circle.
After these terms were refused and the Templars attacked, then the Right of Annulment was the only reasonable answer.
 
Not even the Seekers would ever allow a spirit to possess recruits, at most, it touched their minds only.

thats a love convience lol. Just touch not "bond" a spirit lol

[Jaison1986]

No one has even implied that all Seers go on a rampage. However, there are circumstances to take into account.

For one, mages are extremely dangerous to begin with. If you add spirits to the mix, not only do you make the mage more powerful (thus increasing the threat he or she poses) you are also making their minds vulnerable to the corrupting influence of alien beings who can not even comprehend the concept of time and immutability, much less ethics and morals if they enter in conflict with the emotions they embody. Justice and Anders are a perfect example of this.

 

Considering that possession is unnecessary to maintain one's life or mental integrity, if the Seers are as neglectful and uncaring of the safety of both themselves and the citizens of Rivain as to allow mass possessions to occur, then the Templars and Seekers were in the right, both moral and lawful, to demand them cease immediately and comply by the laws of the Circle.

After these terms were refused and the Templars attacked, then the Right of Annulment was the only reasonable answer.

 

Not even the Seekers would ever allow a spirit to possess recruits, at most, it touched their minds only.

 

Just so you know, the templars peacefully coexisted with the mages of Rivain, trouble only started when the Seekers arrive and ordered the circle destruction. You think that if the Seers were really causing that much disaster the templars wouldn't have put an stop to them much before the Seekers arrived?

[Br3admax]

No one has even implied that all Seers go on a rampage. However, there are circumstances to take into account.

For one, mages are extremely dangerous to begin with. If you add spirits to the mix, not only do you make the mage more powerful (thus increasing the threat he or she poses) you are also making their minds vulnerable to the corrupting influence of alien beings who can not even comprehend the concept of time and immutability, much less ethics and morals if they enter in conflict with the emotions they embody. Justice and Anders are a perfect example of this.

 

Considering that possession is unnecessary to maintain one's life or mental integrity, if the Seers are as neglectful and uncaring of the safety of both themselves and the citizens of Rivain as to allow mass possessions to occur, then the Templars and Seekers were in the right, both moral and lawful, to demand them cease immediately and comply by the laws of the Circle.

After these terms were refused and the Templars attacked, then the Right of Annulment was the only reasonable answer.

 

Not even the Seekers would ever allow a spirit to possess recruits, at most, it touched their minds only.

This. I'm all for communicating with spirits, put possession is one step too far. 

 

Just so you know, the templars peacefully coexisted with the mages of Rivain, trouble only started when the Seekers arrive and ordered the circle destruction. You think that if the Seers were really causing that much disaster the templars wouldn't have put an stop to them much before the Seekers arrived?

The Templars didn't know about it or came from the exact same culture. Of course they aren't going to disagree. 

[o Ventus]

Just did Cassandra's romance and I got to say, it was really beautiful. Kind of reminded me of my first romance back in highschool. There were candles, poetry, but we weren't outside or anything.

Almost shed a tear at the comparisons. Nothing like young love I tell you....

Mine involved lots of locking myself away from people because of nasty rumors springing up about me during that time, and several of my friends refusing to speak to me for a couple of years because of it.

 

Nothing says "I love you" like telling people that you're a woman-hitting arseh*le with violent tendencies. And it isn't like they don't have reason to believe those claims, seeing how I was always one of the quiet and reserved people (because if they don't open up to someone else instantly, that means they MUST have crippling social problems, because why else wouldn't they be instantly friendly with everybody?).

 

And one of my friends seriously asks me why I don't have another girlfriend.

[RobRam10]

I think the Inquisitor and Cass both have the best looks (heavy/warrior at least). 

 

You can make the long coats for her early on.. it's just one of the defender sets.

You must be joking the Inquisitor's armor are terrible.

[raging_monkey]

You must be joking the Inquisitor's armor are terrible.

not the rogue ones

[Br3admax]

not the rogue ones

It's all the same armor with different gloves and boots. So yeah, most of it is pretty awful. Only the Battlemage/Battlemaster/Prowler sets are worth having, and you have to wait until level 11 to brave the level 16 wastes to get them. 

[prosthetic soul]

You must raise your hand if you romanced Cassandra your first run through but inadvertently made her divine, hated how the romance turned out, and then promptly deleted that character, started all over and just now beat the game again the RIGHT WAY. 

 

*raises hand*

[Br3admax]

You really buy into the Templar dogma don't you? I'm a proponent of what works works. It isn't raining abominations in Rivan, They consort with spirits much like Solas. 

No they don't. Literally no one but Flemeth has since the fall of Arlathan. Seriously. They just meet something in the Fade and let it posses them. That's stupid. I don't give a **** about Templar dogma, it not being real and all, what I care about is that if a culture can pass of an abomination as a natural occurrence and not blame it on themselves, there's a problem. 

 

 

And they're damn good at it too. They follow the natural order like Morrigan. 

 Lol, right. What good, besides the Warden possibly, has ever come from Morrigan following the "natural order?" If anything DA has been since the very beginning saying to move forward and stop being mired in the past. Unless you get a different meaning from every choice she's ever made biting her in the ass. 

Abominations are an inevitability whether you like it or not. 

 Not it isn't. Tell the spirit or demon no. If you can't do that become Tranquil. Problem solved. If you aren't strong enough to resist a demon, you don't need magical powers. 

Just because the Rivaini accept it doesn't mean it's common occurrence. You're pulling extrapolations from thin air while straddling the fence on the definition of abominations. Wynne isn't an abomination, she's merely 'possessed' because....? You say so. But all the Seers in Rivain are abominations because... You say so? C'mon now.

You're arguing that we should just let ticking time bombs that can kill entire villages as children exist because Solas. That's honestly, no offense, the dumbest thing I've seen in a long time. And I've seen a lot recently. And I clearly said Wynne wasn't possessed. Once again, having a spirit inside you, does not make you possessed. You have to willingly merge with it, or it has to torture you until you give in to it's demands. Otherwise, you are not possessed.