Warder, you claim that Pro-Mages are delusional and prone to hyperbole and exaggeration. You would insinuate that your particular camp isn't as guilty of such flaws.
Yet here the Pro-Templars are defending a rapist Adolf Hitler.

Warder, you claim that Pro-Mages are delusional and prone to hyperbole and exaggeration. You would insinuate that your particular camp isn't as guilty of such flaws.
Yet here the Pro-Templars are defending a rapist Adolf Hitler.

Guest_Puddi III_*
Seriously. Whenever you are given a choice it's up to you. It doesn't mean that I believe that it's alright for people to go around and threaten others into having sex with them, it's just terminology.
Rape is any sex without consent, consent at gunpoint obviously is not a valid form of consent. To say you have to "resist with all your might" for it to be rape is ****** stupid, man.
Warder, you claim that Pro-Mages are delusional and prone to hyperbole and exaggeration. You would insinuate that your particular camp isn't as guilty of such flaws.
Yet here the Pro-Templars are defending a rapist Adolf Hitler.
Only one basically doing that is Warder
Defending Alrik is disgusting, but only one pro-Templar poster is doing it, so I wouldn't really brand the whole group with it.
Rape is any sex without consent, consent at gunpoint obviously is not a valid form of consent. To say you have to "resist with all your might" for it to be rape is ****** stupid, man.
Well, opinions.
Should I report this? I feel like I should report this.
Should I report this? I feel like I should report this.
You do whatever you feel like doing.
Warder, you claim that Pro-Mages are delusional and prone to hyperbole and exaggeration. You would insinuate that your particular camp isn't as guilty of such flaws.
Defending Alrik is neither of those things.
Kind of a losing battle considering he is written to be universally despised but it's not hyperbole or exaggeration.
Only one basically doing that is Warder
Yet it's perfectly fine to make such a blanket statement based on the commentary of only one Pro-Mage. I didn't see you sticking up for them when Warder made his comment.
What's your position again?
Defending Alrik is neither of those things.
Kind of a losing battle considering he is written to be universally despised but it's not hyperbole or exaggeration.
Defending Alrik is delusional.
Defending Alrik is delusional.
Everybody is free to defend whoever they feel like needs defense.
Yet it's perfectly fine to make such a blanket statement based on the commentary of only one Pro-Mage. I didn't see you sticking up for them when Warder made his comment.
What's your position again?
Because he never made that statement against the entire group of Pro-Mages, which is true as certain people on both sides resorts to hyperbole and exaggeration
Yet it's perfectly fine to make such a blanket statement based on the commentary of only one Pro-Mage. I didn't see you sticking up for them when Warder made his comment.
What's your position again?
Yet it's perfectly fine to make such a blanket statement based on the commentary of only one Pro-Mage. I didn't see you sticking up for them when Warder made his comment.
What's your position again?
Because he never made that statement against the entire group of Pro-Mages, which is true as certain people on both sides resorts to hyperbole and exaggeration
I'll agree that saying all Pro-Templars share the views as Warden and Kain is like saying all Pro-Mages share the views as the extremists on that side.
Should I report this? I feel like I should report this.
Yes.
I'll agree that saying all Pro-Templars share the views as Warden and Kain is like saying all Pro-Mages share the views as the extremists on that side.
I'm not pro templar though.
Yes.
I did.
He will claim he is neutral but during my time here since 2009 I have yet to see him say something nice about mages where he goes out of his way to condemn mages. "Neutral". Right.
Where have I ever condemned mages?, your trying to put words in peoples mouths because I always argued against you, xil, and few others
And I've never said anything nice towards mages? lol exaggeration right there
Everybody is free to defend whoever they feel like needs defense.
Alrik does not have a defense. He's a monster in all but appearance if I put aside my shtick for a moment.
Monsters like Alrik cannot be credibly defended.
I'm not pro templar though.
True, but you are agreeing with Warden whose opinions are being used as a blanket statement. In fact, you not being Pro-Templar actually helps the case of people shouldn't be doing that.
Alrik does not have a defense. He's a monster in all but appearance if I put aside my shtick for a moment.
Monsters like Alrik cannot be credibly defended.
It's not for you to decide, but for every person to decide for themselves. If someone believes that Alrik is a saint, then it's their valid opinion.
I have to believe that anyone who is defending Alrik is either arguing for the sake of it or completely missed the point of the character.
Where have I ever condemned mages?, your trying to put words in peoples mouths because I always argued against you, xil, and few others
And many others you mean? You are one of the old ones and I have seen too much of it to make a mistake or "put words in your mouth". You never defended mages nor tried to see their side. Don't get me wrong your arguments were logical but were not neutral. I've never seen you arguing against pro Templars. For example you allowed warder's defending of Alrik go unchallenged but I've seen you attack people who defend Adrian and Anders etc... Its important to note I was defending my reasons of liking anders, I was not defending Anders himself. There is a huge difference. Warder was defending Alrik himself.
And this is not the first time, I've seen it many times. You are silent when something like this happens but go out of your way to argue with mage counterpart of this. The bias is clear. Not that I remotely care. I just wanted to put it out there.
It's not for you to decide, but for every person to decide for themselves. If someone believes that Alrik is a saint, then it's their valid opinion.
There are opinions and there are people who are objectively wrong.
It's not for you to decide, but for every person to decide for themselves. If someone believes that Alrik is a saint, then it's their valid opinion.
I'm normally of the belief that opinions cannot be wrong. I have just rescinded such ridiculousness.