Cerberus is still evil, right? *Beware of spoilers*
#101
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 05:36
#102
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 05:45
JudgeQwerty wrote...
It won't just be 'We're fighting for humanity' and I have three choices that say "Though you make me sick..." "You're right..." and "Go Cerberus!!"
Thoughts?
Hah, nailed it.
#103
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 07:37
Modifié par Sgt Lindog, 09 juin 2010 - 07:41 .
#104
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 08:38
#105
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 08:55
News flash - was Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary? No. Japan was done for. But US thought they need the show of force to establish their supremacy (vs Stalin mostly).Vaulin Faust wrote...
Their core belief is that humans deserve a greater role in the galactic community, and that the Alliance is too hamstrung by law and public opinion to stand up effectively to the Citadel races. Any methods of advancing humanity's ascension are justified, including illegal or dangerous experimentation, terrorist activities, sabotage and assassination. Cerberus operatives accept that these methods are brutal, but believe history will vindicate them.
Evil, no. Renegade, very much so.
Cerberus doesn't pretend to be some holier than thou organization of skittles & gum drops. It knows what it does is brutal, unethical, and often times callous, but they understand that ethics and an unwillingness to do the
unreprehensible for the greater good, ultimately retards progress.
Cerberus would have dropped the bomb on Hiroshima in WW2, not because they're mean or evil, but b/c the projected casualties of an amphibious assault on mainland Japan were almost a million, and that the death of 200k civilians was an acceptable loss to end the fighting quickly.
Please stop posting such nonsense.
And as for Cerberus and TIM. He does everything to further human goals in the universe. Its like "better to rule in hell that serve in heaven" doctrine. Sounds nice, every one can "rule in hell" right? All fell for it but what it really means is that the Lucifer himself will rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.
Same goes for TIM imo - humanity will be safe, we will establish new order with reign of humanity. With TIM speaking from the seat of power.
#106
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 08:56
#107
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 01:45
Japan may have been on the downhill run of the war by this time but they werent going to call it quits that easily, like the samurai, most of japan still obeyed the code of death before dishonour and it was only by such a tremendous show of force and superior technology (the atom bomb) that they were able to convince japan otherwise. I'm not saying america did the right or wrong thing but this historical event does show similar relations to how cerberus conduct their operations. They are trying to protect and advance humanity irreguardless of the casulaties to other races.hangmans tree wrote...
News flash - was Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary? No. Japan was done for. But US thought they need the show of force to establish their supremacy (vs Stalin mostly).
Please stop posting such nonsense.
#108
Posté 11 juin 2010 - 03:55
#109
Posté 11 juin 2010 - 04:14
Modifié par StodgyFrost98, 11 juin 2010 - 04:16 .





Retour en haut






