glacier1701 wrote...
I do not put myself in the loss of the LIs camp because this issue is symptomatic of a much larger issue. The main HYPE about the ME universe and Shepard's story is that YOUR choices matter and will carry over into the next part of the series. It was even clearly stated what were considered the MAJOR choices in the eyes of the LEAD PRODUCER for the game. Yet it was then made clear by the very same people that some of those choices were not going to have consequences despite being MAJOR choices. The forum feedback was not pleasant to say the least and a lot of backtracking and 'clarifications' and 'it was taken out of context' started happening. Still despite all that a MAJOR choice has no consequence as so far revealed.
I think part of the issue is people putting too much stock in what BW said. Not saying BW intentionally lied, or hyped the choices part of the game just to flog it , just that I think people should be a bit more wary when it comes to things like this to living up to their expectations.
Also, I guess it comes down to peoples interpretation, both of what we were told, and whether what we now know matches that. For example I personally never had any expectation that the LI choice being a major choice meant they would be recruitable in the second game. Others like yourself obviously did.
-POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT-
Now from what i have seen of the launch trailer, it looks like Ashley (and therefore probably Kaiden, and possibly Liara) gets taken by the collectors. Having a very personal extra bit of motivation (i.e. saving your LI) for defeating the collectors certainly counts as a choice you made in ME1 having an impact in ME2 imo
-SPOILER END-
glacier1701 wrote...
To head off the inevitable feedback that BW knew would occur we got the 'have to save them for ME3 to close off POTENTIAL storylines' spiel. If BW thought that only a small minority of people would complain they would not have bothered to come up with this they would have said nothing.
Ok, you are going into "it's all a conspiracy" territory there.
glacier1701 wrote...
To a large extent the people who made ME2 possible and who are upset over the handling of this are being counted as acceptable losses and being shown the door. We seem to be no longer wanted.
You and I paid money for a game, and then BW used that money to fund making another game. We did
not pay BW for a game and cast-iron garuntee that said sequel would match all our wildest dreams.
glacier1701 wrote...
I am almost certain that IF the reviews had in them another scoring criteria based on continiuty we'd not be seeing 90+% final scores but something down in the 70s.
Games should be judged as standalone games imo. If a game is well made and fun to play, I dont think the how it follows up on the first game should have a huge impact on its score.
glacier1701 wrote...
For a company that prides itself on characters and story they seem to have really misplaced a large chunk of it in ME2.
Having not played the game, is it not a little early to pass judgement on it's characters and story?