10% of Earth's population in ME3 is something like 1.1. billion people.
That actually might be about right.
I was protesting the improper use of the word more than anything.
10% of Earth's population in ME3 is something like 1.1. billion people.
That actually might be about right.
I was protesting the improper use of the word more than anything.
You would all die. They're Reapers. Even Shepard cannot handle one without a mother thresher maw/quarian fleet/sustained support, and the victory on Palaven was of much different scale and also short lived.
You'd probably have more surviving small resistance groups for a while though. I think that could happen.
I am going to make a Fallout style vault and hide while you guys all get harvested by reapurz.
Yeah, the South would be left alone entirely. Hopefully, the 2nd Amendment wouldn't exist in 2186, but otherwise, the Reapers would believe the people of the South to be an underdeveloped species that hasn't evolved yet.
hey now...
I've lived in the midwest. It's really not as back-asswards as many on the coasts seem to believe. There's electricity, smart phones, cable/satellite TV, Internet, indoor plumbing, all the fixtures at a fraction of the cost of living.
I remember Allers had another blurb suggesting that just about everyone in the highly-rural Taiga region was harvested. We're talking about a widely-dispersed population. I don't think they ever explained how exactly the Reapers managed that, or put much thought into how they could manage that.
I meant no disrespect to the midwest, I actually grew up next to a farm myself, and am aware phone service, internet access, and all other creature comforts are pretty ubiquitous these days. All I was trying to say was that in driving through this vast country I have passed homesteads straight out of the Courage the Cowardly Dog, and there are only so many reapers that a farmer miles upon miles from the nearest population center is probably OK in the short term during a planetary invasion.
One Banshee would rip apart any gun owner I know in seconds.
We could survive against Husks, Cannibals, and Marauders. Sure. But they're like the more disposable of the troops anyway, with 1000s more just sitting behind them.
I live in Vancouver. So I'm pretty fucked.
Also, something here that's been bothering me: If you think you're city or town got 'decimated', you got off very lucky.
Decimation is to reduce by a tenth. Whenever you say something got decimated, you're saying that ten percent was destroyed.
The human race got decimated: Ten percent of the human race was destroyed. Ninety person are fine.
Just a pet peeve of mine.
Wrong.
That's the historical definition. But that's entirely irrelevant, since we all know words change over time.
Any modern dictionary will acknowledge that as least one definition of 'decimate' is to reduce or destroy drastically. And so long as that one definition is there, that common usage of 'decimate' is completely correct.
Wrong.
That's the historical definition. But that's entirely irrelevant, since we all know words change over time.
Any modern dictionary will acknowledge that as least one definition of 'decimate' is to reduce or destroy drastically. And so long as that one definition is there, that common usage of 'decimate' is completely correct.
So if a swede gives you a bottle with the word "Gift" on it, the it might not mean Gift as in it's english meaning buth rather "poison" as in rat poison or something... It's crazy how words can have very different meaning.
The word '******'.
Which, somehow, over time, changed from being 'a bundle of sticks' into a derogatory word for homosexual.... but not before changing into a cigarette.
edit:
context should make clear what I tried to type there ![]()
I know the US would put up a better fight than the Alliance did on the ground. We have leaders that know what there doing.
Wrong.
That's the historical definition. But that's entirely irrelevant, since we all know words change over time.
Any modern dictionary will acknowledge that as least one definition of 'decimate' is to reduce or destroy drastically. And so long as that one definition is there, that common usage of 'decimate' is completely correct.
Then it's not wrong if it's still the definition. I'm going to follow the U.S. Army's Regulation, which includes the word in terms to know in communication, defined exactly the way as I said it was. Reference: AR 25-50.
Otherwise, you're claiming I'm wrong and then affirming I'm right and launching into semantics.
Actually, I do have a bigass poster of the Reapers landing in Cologne back from GamesCom before ME3 launched.
So yeah, there's that. Reapers don't like the Dome.
Damn them, this makes me ANGRY! They must be from Düsseldorf, I suppose!
Also, something here that's been bothering me: If you think you're city or town got 'decimated', you got off very lucky.
Decimation is to reduce by a tenth. Whenever you say something got decimated, you're saying that ten percent was destroyed.
The human race got decimated: Ten percent of the human race was destroyed. Ninety person are fine.
Just a pet peeve of mine.
A Nuclear explosion produces extreme heat. KBs don't stop heat or slow-moving particles. The heat would easily transfer through the air onto the Reaper.
The temperature of the fireball goes from around 300,000 degrees Celsius at the epicenter to 6,000 degrees at the outer edge. Tungsten, which is the most heat-resistant metal in existence, has a melting point of around 3,400 degrees Celsius.
The Reapers would melt. Why they don't just shoot nuclear warheads with those mass accelerators in space is beyond me. Sure, the kinetic impact of a dreadnought's main gun can equate to a 38 kiloton nuke when transferring it's kinetic energy into heat in atmosphere, but in a vacuum this wouldn't happen; a KB would absorb all the kinetic energy, so no extreme heat.
The reapers were made in Leviathan's form. They may not have all their capabilities. Leviathan doesn't have the laser and they can't fly. We don't know the full capabilities of a reaper.
Correction, we havn't been told if leviathans can fly or not.
I don't have to be told that those things can't fly. Physics just won't allow them to fly.
Unless they have an eezo core... cause... physics.
I live in NYC, so if it's not yet underwater by the 2180's, it's all a smoldering pile of rubble overrun with husks. I'm not sure what the rest of the country would even look like by then, but I imagine there would be a hell of a lot more cityscape than we have now.
I don't have to be told that those things can't fly. Physics just won't allow them to fly.
Unless they have an eezo core... cause... physics.
Well if anyone feels unsafe with the threat of reapurz, if you make 9 easy payments of $999.99 I can hook you up with a fancy high-tech vault that will protect you from everything from nuclear warfare to a reapurz invasion.
Asari can fly.... Why wouldn't the "Apex race" that enslaved the galaxy a billion years ago, who's still around and who cleary has plenty of freaky power not be able to fly?
Secondly.... If they can't fly, how coudl they then have been soptted in space, and killed a Reaper in space?
I would think that they can fly, and they might be able to use spaceship sized biotics....
They are the ridiculously overpowered Aliens that created the Reapers and they are still around to tell the story, and the Catalyst doesn't seem to be that interested in engaging them other than probing them from a distance.
Asari do not have wings. That's birds and dragons.
Well my hometown would probably be gone, as I believe that The Reapers attacked and detonated nuclear weapons and I live/work within range to the Faslane naval base which holds the UKs nuclear arsenal(although hopefully not for long)