Chantry Apologist propaganda, that’s kinda cute, I dig it.
The Chantry sister was quick to tell Uldred that she won’t trust their lives to him solely because he’s a mage. The other one was a self-righteous condescending jackass. Petrice was a fool. The Qunari attacked when they had had enough of her skullduggery. Not before, not during, but after all of her schemes had laid the groundwork for aggression against the Qunari. She and Isabela are almost entirely at fault for that fiasco. The Priest at Redcliffe says that to the WARDEN because it’s the norm to do the opposite, if it isn’t, why would she bother? That’s also supported by Wynne and Cole in town from Asunder. Which is supported by Wynne’s stories, herself. Which is also supported by Jowan's story about his own benevolent parents.
I can confidently label it as slavery too, btw.
Full Definition of SLAVERY according to Merriam Webster
1. Drudgery, toil.
2. Submission to a dominating influence.
3. The state of a person who is a chattel to another.
Chattel as defined by Webster: something (such as a slave, piece of furniture, tool, etc.) that a person owns other than land or buildings.
**Mages are traditionally owned by the Divine aka the Chantry**
The mages fit at least two of the definitions of slavery, take it up with Webster if you don’t like it.
I swear to your maker if you use the word ‘safety’ and ‘chantry’ close together again… Or were you referring to Fereldan and Kirkwall? Where the mages were ‘safe’? Like when the Uldred became an abomination, was he ‘safe from his own power’, were other mages safe from his power? I'm sure the mages who committed suicide felt pretty safe too. Also, Circle Mages DO NOT have any reliable recourse should they experience abuses, they are completely and utterly at the mercy of the Knight Commander. You can scream First Enchanter from the rooftops all ya like. But ask Orsino about the illegal Tranquil popping up in the gallows. Oh, I’m sorry, he’s not allowed beyond the courtyard.
An inaccurate hyperbole would look something like this “The mages are given perhaps the greatest of gifts by the Chantry”.
They’ve grossly overpaid the Elves for any transgressions that they may be at fault for. Then the Chantry calls it a mercy and sends Templars out to go after their Dalish keepers should they stay ‘too long’. All the while looking the other way in the event of an Alienage purge, or if they’re being sold into slavery. That is if the
elves aren’t currently toiling away in an Andrastian’s kitchen. Worried about being raped, beaten, and never seeing justice.
The Chantry and its Andrastians are nothing more than a watered down Tevinter. They are which they hate most and now they can’t even maintain that.
Even Rome fell; Do not be surprised if it is an option.
Because magic isn't infallible, there was no notion of if the spell in question would even serve, given that there wasn't any basis for his proposal to begin with. The Chantry representative may have cut him off, but it was hardly the smack across the face you portray. The Qunari are not allies of Thedas, they are enemies, neutral at the moment or no that will never change until either they all die or succeed. Petrice merely recognized that fact, There is nothing to be gained by pretending friendship with the Oxmen, not a thing. The Priest rallying the townspeople to support the Chantry Law of rooting out illegal magic outside of the circle? Such a travesty! It doesn't matter that illegal mages have no ward against possession, no shield against the threat their magic brings, nor the danger they can cause! Oh no, Because The Chantry Encourages mages to be run down in the streets, not taken to the circle for training and to be kept safe.
You can twist and squirm but it doesn't change what Thedas is.
You misconstruing the dictionary doesn't make what you write to be anymore accurate, just so you know. The Mages are not Slaves, they are not forced to work, To Toil or even pressed into service to fight, The Common People of Thedas, the Serfs, the Servants, and the Press Gangs that herd them into the armies of the Lords, Are more akin to slaves then any mage.
Uldred as a Libertatiarian Mercenary, a failure of the circle most certainly, but there will always be Uldred's, Non Mage Uldreds even. You can more remove Greed and stupidity from Mankind then you can wish to fade from Thedas. When Those numbers become more then a mere reference by an insane reference by an abomination perhaps we will look into Mage suicide numbers. Until then though? Its only mention comes from a fairly biased and untrustworthy source.
It is the law of the Land, the Dalish flaunt it, They linger upon Possessed National or Personal Lands, and the Chantry reacts accordingly. If they wish to avoid that, either submit their Mages to the circle or have them linger in the remote corners of the world. Either or. And the National Monarchies have no issue with that either, You seem to be holding up the Chantry to be the Antagonist when it merely stays out of Political Affairs for the most part, If you wish to hang "Elven mistreatment" on any one, perhaps it would be better be served by actually pointing the finger at those who write and enforce those laws.
Really? When the Chantry allows non mages to be classified as little more then second class citizens or property, perhaps that label will hold water. The Mages are kept away from society, and that is the end of it. They aren't used for blood rituals, they aren't used for foot soldiers, they aren't labeled property. Watered down Tevinter? A more accurate label would be "Nothing at all like the Imperium".
The Chantry isn't Rome, Don't be surprised if it isn't an option.