Aller au contenu

Photo

Interesting Overheard Citadel Convo (me2)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
13 réponses à ce sujet

#1
lokiarchetype

lokiarchetype
  • Members
  • 424 messages
Here's a convo you can overhear while visiting the citadel, I thought it was pretty awesome so I decided to share it.  Just imagine R Lee Ermey reciting the lines.

Gunnery Chief: Private, WHAT is Newton's first law?

Private: Sir, an object in motion stays in motion, sir!

Gunnery Chief: You do NOT get credit for partial answers, Private.

Private: Sir, unless acted upon by another force, sir!

Gunnery Chief: That is right.  Space is empty.  When you fire a weapon, that projectile will travel until it hits the ship, or the planet behind that ship, or some unfortunate mother ****er 10,000 light years away.  You will hit someone, somewhere, sometime.  THAT is why, Private Chung, we do not 'eyeball' our target!  That is why we wait for a firing solution. This is a weapon of mass destruction, we do not shoot from the hip like some cowboy!

Modifié par lokiarchetype, 22 janvier 2010 - 03:57 .


#2
Colinissile

Colinissile
  • Members
  • 245 messages
This is from Mass Effect 1? Where!? I never heard this, and I thought I've seen everrryything!

#3
Flakkar

Flakkar
  • Members
  • 46 messages
That's just awesome lol

#4
AlbertoAquilani

AlbertoAquilani
  • Members
  • 737 messages
He's talking about Mass Effect 2, since the first one featured no swearing.

#5
v0rt3x22

v0rt3x22
  • Members
  • 2 339 messages
:D funny

#6
Colinissile

Colinissile
  • Members
  • 245 messages

AlbertoAquilani wrote...

He's talking about Mass Effect 2, since the first one featured no swearing.


Ok, thanks, just wanted to make sure...I was afraid I actually missed something..
And yes, it is quite funny :P

#7
EJon

EJon
  • Members
  • 578 messages
the first one had swearing, just no F-bombs.

#8
Apophis2412

Apophis2412
  • Members
  • 1 000 messages
Please don't post ME2 spoilers in this forum. :(

I don't want my gameplay be spoiled.

#9
TheMightyOm

TheMightyOm
  • Members
  • 60 messages
Pfft Newton.

I prefer Einstein's theory, stating that if there is a force applied to an object, it would deviate from the geodesics in spacetime.

#10
lokiarchetype

lokiarchetype
  • Members
  • 424 messages

Apophis2412 wrote...


Please don't post ME2 spoilers in this forum. :(

I don't want my gameplay be spoiled.


It's a throwaway conversation you overhear, I really didn't imagine anyone would be concerned about such a thing.

#11
Vengeful Nature

Vengeful Nature
  • Members
  • 868 messages

TheMightyOm wrote...

Pfft Newton.
I prefer Einstein's theory, stating that if there is a force applied to an object, it would deviate from the geodesics in spacetime.


"Holy Dog S**t! Only steers and queers like Einstein's theory of geodesics in spacetime, and you don't look much like a steer to me so that kind of narrows it down!"

Little Gunnery Sergeant Hartman for you there, in the spirit of this thread. Posted Image

#12
verskk

verskk
  • Members
  • 288 messages
 Well that throwaway convo is spoiled...

Anyway, maybe just consider putting SPOILER in the title just in case.

#13
Guest_HK74_*

Guest_HK74_*
  • Guests

TheMightyOm wrote...

Pfft Newton.
I prefer Einstein's theory, stating that if there is a force applied to an object, it would deviate from the geodesics in spacetime.


Yeah yeah yeah, everyone likes the old dude on the poster with his tongue sticking out but let's face facts; Newton was the better dressed of the two.

#14
TheMightyOm

TheMightyOm
  • Members
  • 60 messages
Newton's theories depended on underlying assumptions he penned as "absolute space," an inert arena where events take place, and "absolute time," which flows at the same rate for all observers.

Einstein blew away both of these assumptions outright. So, yes, Newton's laws must be rejected as Newton understood them.



In other words