An option to exile or imprison Loghain would be interesting options. But since the game railroads us into choosing between dead Loghain and warden Loghain, I've more often chosen dead Loghain.
I've mentioned this before, but the whole situation surrounding Riorden suggesting that Loghain become a warden just appears contrived.
1) Even though you and Alistair have only been wardens for less than a year and have largely been by themselves, Riorden just assumed that they knew about the Archdemon and doesn't realize the flaw of his logic until Redcliffe. Why not take Alistair and the Warden aside and tell them just in case and make his case for having more wardens more plausible?
2) How does Anora know about the Joining and it's lethality? Isn't that something that people outside of the order aren't supposed to know about? Who would have told Anora? Especially considering that wardens have only recently been brought back into Ferelden and only had a few dozen wardens at most, I doubt that any of them would have blabbed to anyone outside of the order.
3) Why does it have to be Loghain? There are at least a few dozen knights and your own companions as candidates for the Joining. Why not recruit them? Or does Riorden only have enough Joining Juice for one person?
4) How does Riorden know that Loghain would be a good warden? Considering that Loghain just spent the past year handing Ferelden to the darkspawn on a silver platter due to his own paranoia, he doesn't exactly seem like the ideal warden. Pragmatic and ruthless doesn't automatically equal effective and useful as Loghain himself clearly demonstrates as he continually dig a metaphorical ditch that he only kept making deeper.
So with this in mind, I usually kill him. An argument can be made for sparing Loghain or even recruiting him. But it's not an argument that would be supported by the events of the game.





Retour en haut






