Mhmm.
._. When i repeat one cited piece of evidence that may or may not be valid by the point of DAI, feel free to call me out it and point out as comparable to the reliance on One Adrastian Mage and One Dalish Pariah alrightie?
Til then, Its not much to go on by my reckoning.
Z, pot meet kettle. We all do it, so please get off your high horse.
When i call a stance "retarded" that may actually be a valid comparison, but Xill dragging that over here isn't an overly accurate comparison.
Not overly surprised by it though its, Xill, inaccurate and sporadic fit the bill.
Considering Merrill repeatedly insists on trusting/sympathizing with demons I'm disinclined to see her lecturing of Anders as anything but hypocritical.
Wait, are we seriously having forum ettiquete brought up on BSN forums...when did I enter the twilight zone.
Considering Merrill repeatedly insists on trusting/sympathizing with demons I'm disinclined to see her lecturing of Anders as anything but hypocritical.
oh great here we go.............Lob please resist....please.
When i call a stance "retarded" that may actually be a valid comparison, but Xill dragging that over here isn't an overly accurate comparison.
Not overly surprised by it though its, Xill, inaccurate and sporadic fit the bill.
Again, attacking the poster.
Considering Merrill repeatedly insists on trusting/sympathizing with demons I'm disinclined to see her lecturing of Anders as anything but hypocritical.
Yup.
Wait, are we seriously having forum ettiquete brought up on BSN forums...when did I enter the twilight zone.
No, Xill drug over a post from another forum i made, when i got called "retarded" for supporting a templar stance and i told the person it wasn't nice.
Apparently that's comparable to being mildly annoyed by a conjecture piece via Lob.
Considering Merrill repeatedly insists on trusting/sympathizing with demons I'm disinclined to see her lecturing of Anders as anything but hypocritical.
At least she wasn't dumb enough to let one possess her.
Again, attacking the poster.
XD
I mean really Z there's a reason for that hosility with Xili many posters show. I told you we've been having debates for years. I don't know why you just assumed we were being rude asshats for no reason. 
Well least you somewhat see now.
Again, attacking the poster.
Again, You miss the point. In fact were this situation comparable I'd even find this vaguely amusing, as it though? Its inaccurate and annoying.
Deliberately I'd imagine, but that's fair i suppose.
You can strew things however you wish, it doesn't make them true.
Considering Merrill repeatedly insists on trusting/sympathizing with demons I'm disinclined to see her lecturing of Anders as anything but hypocritical.
Allow me to point out that being able to wring deals out of demons and betray them later, which is the only thing she really advocates doing, does not actually involve trusting or sympathizing with them overmuch.
XD
I mean really Z there's a reason for that hosility with Xili. I told you we've been having debates for years. I don't know why you just assumed we were being rude asshats for no reason.
Is any one even reading what i post anymore?
It came from another Thread ._.
XD
I mean really Z there's a reason for that hosility with Xili many posters show. I told you we've been having debates for years. I don't know why you just assumed we were being rude asshats for no reason.
Well least you somewhat see now.
Honestly who gives a flying ****. Can we not debate a topic without insulting each other like petty 5 year olds?
At least she wasn't dumb enough to let one possess her.
Yes thanks to Marethari's noble sacrifice. 
* 
*
Is any one even reading what i post anymore?
It came from another Thread ._.
I know. I'm telling you why before remember you first came to the forum and you were like "Why are you all so hostile towards Xili?" what you just experienced was part of the reason why.
That's all.
Honestly who gives a flying ****. Can we not debate a topic without insulting each other like petty 5 year olds?
But but...he started it first!!!111
Seriously though of course we can.
Yes thanks to Marethari's noble sacrifice.
XD
I do hope that mirror doesn't harm Merrill if you friended her. Though even if it does I rivaled her so *dances*
Allow me to point out that being able to wring deals out of demons and betray them later, which is the only thing she really advocates doing, does not actually involve trusting or sympathizing with them overmuch.
She had to trust Audacity a little bit. Otherwise she wouldn't do what he suggested for the mirror.
I know. I'm telling you why before remember you first came to the forum and you were like "Why are you all so hostile towards Xili?" what you just experienced was part of the reason why.
That's all.
I am not new the forums, But i do understand.
Its just something to ignore i think, like an animal whimpering for crumbs from the table.
Considering Merrill repeatedly insists on trusting/sympathizing with demons I'm disinclined to see her lecturing of Anders as anything but hypocritical.
Merrill doesn't insist on trusting spirits, she cautions they are all dangerous but says that you can sometimes learn things from them without making a deal with them, as Hawke can with the Profane Abomination and Torpor.
She had to trust Audacity a little bit. Otherwise she wouldn't do what he suggested for the mirror.
To a single extent involving magical techniques, yes.
I am not new the forums, But i do understand.
Its just something to ignore i think, like an animal whimpering for crumbs from the table.
I would recommend that you try to adhere more to your own etiquette pronouncements.
To a single extent involving magical techniques, yes.
Isn't trusting a demon even for a second dangerous?
Merrill doesn't insist on trusting spirits, she cautions they are all dangerous but says that you can sometimes learn things from them without making a deal with them, as Hawke can with the Profane Abomination and Torpor.
Hawke only got something from Topar by signing a deal with him, And the agreement between the PC and the Profane while not an official "deal" in so far that it can be later broken, isn't comparable to getting blood magic from a demon, when they start handing that out for free with out four points in coercion. tell my Warden.
Its a pain getting that specialization on new playthroughs.
Railroading happens Lob. Cheers to killing Red Temps and psycho mages.I'm looking at the situation as being railroaded into an outcome I'd oppose. If this hypothetical situation involved the protagonist being forced into killing the templars and helping the mages to deal with the crisis of the veil tears, I doubt you'd be making the same argument.
I would recommend that you try to adhere more to your own etiquette pronouncements.
And i would recommend you actually sticking to the setting and intent of those pronouncements if you intend to use them for detraction.
Just friendly advice.
Isn't trusting a demon even for a second dangerous?
When it's saying "let me into your mind, I won't turn you into an abomination, pinky-swear," yes. But absolutes are rarely accurate, and saying that a demon can never be trustworthy on anything ever is incorrect.
She had to trust Audacity a little bit. Otherwise she wouldn't do what he suggested for the mirror.
No, Merrill built the Eluvian from lore she gathered and information she extrapolated from the shard. She spoke with Audacity about blood magic, and it was trapped in a statute for nearly a millennia and sundered from the Fade.
Isn't trusting a demon even for a second dangerous?
Speaking with the Profane Abomination and Torpor doesn't require you to make a bargain with either one. You can gather intel, and then attack them, which are moves that are supported by Merrill.
Retour en haut