Aller au contenu

Photo

Is there evidence for the Maker being real?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
66 réponses à ce sujet

#26
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 633 messages

Also, with regard to the OP's question, about the Black City and the magisters' attempt to physically translate into the Fade, about that at least we have a few tidbits of credible evidence. The Maker? Nil.


So the Ashes working isn't evidence at all because we can come up with alternative hypotheses to explain them working? You sure you want to go that far?

Fun fact: I've never actually seen the Black City despite playing mages. I guess I keep the camera in top-down view too much.

#27
Mockingword

Mockingword
  • Members
  • 1 790 messages

About as much evidence as there is for any deity in real life. So none.

 

And according to Gaider, that's how things are going to stay.

 

People are just going to have to settle for never knowing.


  • LobselVith8 et Darth Krytie aiment ceci

#28
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

So the Ashes working isn't evidence at all because we can come up with alternative hypotheses to explain them working? You sure you want to go that far?

Fun fact: I've never actually seen the Black City despite playing mages. I guess I keep the camera in top-down view too much.

"Alternative" hypotheses? What the hell makes "the Maker did it" the default in the first place? It's healing magic of a particularly powerful kind. And? What does that imply about its origin? Nothing.

Besides, I don't know about the power of gods. What I do know something about is the power of belief. Religion may be involved with giving the ashes its power, given how the Fade works and the presence of lyrium, but I see no evidence of some super-powerful spirit or something similar being responsible.

@Mockingword:
That's what I've always expected to happen. Or not happen, if you want. I'm very much ok with that.
  • LobselVith8 aime ceci

#29
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 633 messages

"Alternative" hypotheses? What the hell makes "the Maker did it" the default in the first place? It's healing magic of a particularly powerful kind. And? What does that imply about its origin? Nothing.Besides, I don't know about the power of gods. What I do know something about is the power of belief. Religion may be involved with giving the ashes its power, given how the Fade works and the presence of lyrium, but I see no evidence of some super-powerful spirit or something similar being responsible.@Mockingword:That's what I've always expected to happen. Or not happen, if you want. I'm very much ok with that.


Hmm. By these standards could there ever actually be any kind of evidence? This'll sound rude, but this strikes me as pretty similar to what the IT guys do; any evidence of the Maker is just more magic, just as any evidence that the ME3 endings are real is just more Indoctrination.
  • Aimi et Senya aiment ceci

#30
Wolfen09

Wolfen09
  • Members
  • 2 913 messages

if you took oghren on the sacred urn quest, when you get to the ashes he comments on the large amount of pure lyrium veins running through the chamber...  not all of the effects of lyrium are known, but we do know that lyrium has caused many weird things to happen...  so calling it an act of the maker could technically be dismissed....

 

plus just because magic is involved, doesnt mean there has to be any gods, we have believers in the real world, who's to say it isnt the same...  just because we cant explain the archdemons and fade real well doesnt mean that its all the act of some gods

 

i tend to think of the chantry like the vatican, at one point they controlled all of europe.  It got to where it became more political than religious, which was ultimately their downfall...  i believe we are seeing a similar theme here in da:i. 



#31
Aimi

Aimi
  • Members
  • 4 616 messages

i tend to think of the chantry like the vatican, at one point they controlled all of europe.  It got to where it became more political than religious, which was ultimately their downfall...  i believe we are seeing a similar theme here in da:i.


The Chantry is clearly designed to be evocative of the leadership of Catholicism in the European medieval period, but I wouldn't describe what happened to the Church in the terms you did. "Controlled all of Europe"? "Became more political than religious"? "Ultimately their downfall"? Ehhhhhh...

but then again we don't really need historians messing things up in these threads do we <_<
  • Dean_the_Young aime ceci

#32
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 909 messages
I understand the skepticism of divinity being involved with the ashes but I still fail to understand how lyrium granted the ashes it's healing powers. Mind you if that were the case then Orzammar's dwarves, the tranquil and the Templars should have already displayed an innate Wolverine-lite healing factor by now. Plus red lyrium is out of the question as a small sculpture was potent enough to drive people insane and the sanctuary's walls being made of it means that the Warden's sanity should've been destroyed.
  • Senya aime ceci

#33
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

Hmm. By these standards could there ever actually be any kind of evidence? This'll sound rude, but this strikes me as pretty similar to what the IT guys do; any evidence of the Maker is just more magic, just as any evidence that the ME3 endings are real is just more Indoctrination.

You didn't answer my question: what makes "the Maker did it" the default assumption? Oh, while I'm at it, what makes it a valid assumption in the first place? It connects to nothing and explains nothing. It's a claim in the void, a stopgap assumption. If we actually knew that the Maker existed from independent sources, *then* there would be a point to saying he did it. It is usually considered good scholarship to exhaust explanations in terms of what we already know before we assume additional entities.

Gods, it's as if people suddenly lost the ability for critical thinking once religion enters the picture.

#34
Wolfen09

Wolfen09
  • Members
  • 2 913 messages

not all about lyrium is known, oghren mentions it was the purest he'd seen...  it doesnt mean it works like a super lyrium potion for mages, the red lyrium corrupts stuff, whose to say pure lyrium cant cure you....  environmental effects can influence stuff, its why we have fresh water and salt water, sure its still water but its completely different



#35
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

I understand the skepticism of divinity being involved with the ashes but I still fail to understand how lyrium granted the ashes it's healing powers. Mind you if that were the case then Orzammar's dwarves, the tranquil and the Templars should have already displayed an innate Wolverine-lite healing factor by now. Plus red lyrium is out of the question as a small sculpture was potent enough to drive people insane and the sanctuary's walls being made of it means that the Warden's sanity should've been destroyed.

As I said: the Fade is liable to be shaped by the mental activity of intelligent beings, which means that collective belief can have significant effects there. Since lyrium enables mages to enter the Fade, it is also connected to the Fade. That's the hypothesis I would explore before more exotic possibilities.

Perhaps people's readiness to accept "The Maker did it" has something to do with their inability to see how utterly exotic and extraordinary the assumption of the Makers' existence really is from an in-world perspective if you look at it without religious preconceptions.

#36
Cyberbobmkii

Cyberbobmkii
  • Members
  • 59 messages

The fact that Andraste new the origins of the Darkspawn despite being a barbarian born nearly two centuries after the fact could be taken as her having "Divine Insight".



#37
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

The fact that Andraste new the origins of the Darkspawn despite being a barbarian born nearly two centuries after the fact could be taken as her having "Divine Insight".

Who says that she knew? The Chantry? Or do we have independent historical sources? For a real-world analogy, I would recommend getting familiar with the field of ecclesiastical history. You'd be surprised in which ways once-historical accounts have been changed. In all fields of history, a document's provenance has significant impact on the evaluation of its veracity. I'm inclined to believe Chantry sources in things where it doesn't have an ideological bias. Which of course does not apply to stories about its religion's founder.

As another example, I think the accounts of the war between Andraste's tribe and the Imperium may be largely correct. The religious bias only comes in as an interpretation of the events. The events themselves appear plausible. Also, note how the ghosts in the temple in DAO tell their stories: as factual accounts, with the interpretation, if any, clearly distinguishable as one. These come across as people who know what happened, and know the difference between fact and interpretation. So I think it's plausible to accept the claim that the sacred ashes are really Andraste's ashes. Nowhere, however, do I see any evidence for the Maker.

#38
Spectre Impersonator

Spectre Impersonator
  • Members
  • 2 146 messages

Andraste's Ashes successfully healed a dying man.



#39
Wolfen09

Wolfen09
  • Members
  • 2 913 messages

i wouldnt mind seeing the next novel being about andraste and her war



#40
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

Andraste's Ashes successfully healed a dying man.

Well yeah, so have other healing magics where something else than this particular poison was used. All that really indicates is that this one is different from the one we already knew.

As I said, before I grasp at the straw of a supernatural source, I'd first examine the natural ones. And I count magic among the natural ones since it's clearly a natural force on Thedas. Things would be different if I could presuppose the Maker's existence but I can't do that.

#41
Divine Justinia V

Divine Justinia V
  • Members
  • 5 863 messages
I think it's absolutely possible, there's as much of a possibility as there is having a Templar merged with a spirit, aka Evangeline.

My point is anything is possible. A lot of people associate the Maker with the Christian God, which is understandable since he was designed that way.

#42
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 909 messages

As I said: the Fade is liable to be shaped by the mental activity of intelligent beings, which means that collective belief can have significant effects there. Since lyrium enables mages to enter the Fade, it is also connected to the Fade. That's the hypothesis I would explore before more exotic possibilities.Perhaps people's readiness to accept "The Maker did it" has something to do with their inability to see how utterly exotic and extraordinary the assumption of the Makers' existence really is from an in-world perspective if you look at it without religious preconceptions.

The hypothesis seems far fetched as it would suggest that the Dwarves mining lyrium veins in the Deep Roads are in or connected to the Fade when the lore hints at the opposite.

People could go by another theory that the ashes belong to a powerful mage but it seems unlikely due to there being no mention of this trait amongst Tevinter's magisters' or the Dalish Keepers' remains, while the ashes being only powdered elfroot makes the player question why a pc who's likely to specialize in herbalism is unable to make the distinction.

A credible explanation may already exist but so far i have yet to read a theory to the contrary that doesn't cause plotholes.

Mind you i care little for irl religious debate in a fantasy world but find the theories dismissing the Maker's existence just as flawed and inconclusive to any that proves it.

#43
yakaman91

yakaman91
  • Members
  • 57 messages

not all about lyrium is known, oghren mentions it was the purest he'd seen...  it doesnt mean it works like a super lyrium potion for mages, the red lyrium corrupts stuff, whose to say pure lyrium cant cure you....  environmental effects can influence stuff, its why we have fresh water and salt water, sure its still water but its completely different

 

Chicken or the egg?  Oghren's comments made me think that perhaps the Lyrium grew around the ashes like plants to the sun.  I don't have a problem with the Maker existing in some form; any label will work for a force/presence/entity beyond the scope of understanding.  I simply have minimal trust that the chantry (or any organization with an agenda) represents historical fact.

 

Their 'Maker' is simply their definition.  The Maker, the Trickster, the Formless Ones, the Old Gods, Flemeth....I honestly couldn't say where one ends and the next begins.  We know the Old Gods actually exist, but do we know their nature?  We don't even know what Lyrium is, or exactly what the Fade and the Veil are, and they're omnipresent in the games.



#44
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

Mind you i care little for irl religious debate in a fantasy world but find the theories dismissing the Maker's existence just as flawed and inconclusive to any that proves it.

Lyrium, the power of belief mediated through the Fade, those are things we either already know to exist or whose existence is in accord with the lore. Not to make a too fine point of it, but the Maker's existence is not part of the lore, belief in his existence is. Meanwhile, we know that human dreams can shape the Fade. It's absolutely no stretch to think that collective belief may let magical effects manifest, and since the Fade is (to use yet another in-world theory) co-existent with material reality, it touches everything that isn't specially shielded against it.

Furthermore, the problem with unknown agents is that it's structurally impossible to conclusively falsify their existence, so any convincing evidence of their existence can't be indirect. You'd need to present them. Why do you think physicists spent decades and billions in order to find direct evidence of the Higgs boson? They weren't fooling around. The standards of science demanded it. With unknown free-willed agents the problem becomes even worse. Suppose you assume the Maker exists, how do you know its motivations? I really don't understand why people are unable to see how utterly arbitrary the assumption of some unknown free-willed agent is. You could basically claim anything, and on top of it the assumption explains nothing. If agent X wants something, why? What are its interests, and why? How can its existence be explained? The assumption of unknown free-willed agents makes the problem so much more complex and raises so many more questions than it solves.

Meanwhile - to get back to Thedas - the non-supernatural explanations of Andraste's ashes are just as unproven, but they work with known agents and for that reason are to be preferred unless they run into contradictions. Experiments could be designed to prove or disprove them.

And even that is not the end of it. People accept the Maker as an explanation because the concept is familiar, while in reality it is a concept fantastic beyond anything fantasy has ever invented, a literally world-shattering assumption. What about assuming that this hidden free-willed agent is something like.....Azathoth? May I mention this is just as likely given that we know nothing of the unknown entity's nature and motivation?

Edit:
Perhaps one more example: I guess that if someone claimed "Flemeth did it" this would be dismissed by some as a conspiracy theory. Why then believe in an unknown agent? Isn't that even more of a conspiracy theory?

#45
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Why don't we ever see  "Is there any evidence for the Dalish Pantheon" Being real, or if the "Old Gods" were real.

 

its always the Maker in threads like this.

 

Its just a shameless attempt to discredit a fictional deity which Bioware and Gaider have both said they will not confirm or deny their existence but have said they could very well exist, that should be the end of it.


  • Hanako Ikezawa, Torayuri, Senya et 2 autres aiment ceci

#46
Wolfen09

Wolfen09
  • Members
  • 2 913 messages

thats like saying your not going to play the game because it isnt real

 

we do it because its entertaining to those of us who are bored to tears at work



#47
aphelion4

aphelion4
  • Members
  • 306 messages

I have no trouble believing in the possibility of a God/gods existing considering there is no other logical explanation for how everything came into existence. I'd take "a wizard did it" over no explanation at all. :3

 

So yes, the Maker/elven gods being real seems possible to me. It'd be more interesting if they did exist.



#48
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

If the folks who create the lore of the game in question, make it possible for the deity to exist you should accept possibility of their existence.

 

That's my point.



#49
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

If the folks who create the lore of the game in question, make it possible for the deity to exist you should accept possibility of their existence.

We're not talking about possibilities but about actualities. Meanwhile, the fact that a lot of people believe in something alone says nothing about its possibility, and even less about its actuality. The lore says a lot of people believe in the Maker but nothing more.

Edit:
BTW, if we had the knowledge to correctly evaluate if the existence of a creator god is possible, we would most likely also have enough knowledge to examine whether one actually exists. Yet again, all the lore tells us is that the belief exists.

Edit2:
We'll never have conclusive evidence of either side. What we're debating here is whether certain facts presented by the lore can be counted as indirect evidence. It is my claim that everything presented as evidence in this thread would be dismissed as a great deal too far-fetched if not for a pre-existing disposition towards acceptance of a creator god and miracles. This disposition being created by real-world familiarity with the concept so that explanations made in those terms come more easily to people's minds.

#50
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

We're not talking about possibilities but about actualities. Meanwhile, the fact that a lot of people believe in something alone says nothing about its possibility, and even less about its actuality. The lore says a lot of people believe in the Maker but nothing more.

Edit:
BTW, if we had the knowledge to correctly evaluate if the existence of a creator god is possible, we would most likely also have enough knowledge to examine whether one actually exists. Yet again, all the lore tells us is that the belief exists.

 

Because we cannot measure it in that spectrum?

 

Because Bioware it self has said its a matter of faith.

 

._. Honestly you trying to look it in a light that Bioware it self said you shouldn't given there isn't any conclusive evidence for any of these deities, i was just pointing out that there isn't any evidence of any patheon existing, its just the Maker seemingly gets targeted more then any deity for credence of its existence.

 

So take it as a matter of faith and move on, sheesh.


  • Torayuri, Senya et The Hierophant aiment ceci