Aller au contenu

Photo

Can someone explain the different sexualities to me?


8 réponses à ce sujet

#1
DrBlingzle

DrBlingzle
  • Members
  • 2 073 messages

Is it just me or are the different kinds or sexualties being called out in BSN starting to get confusing? Okay I understand hetero, bi and homosexuality perfectly well but some of the different(?) kinds of sexualities mentioned here have been confusing me. I think I start to understand one and then someone gives me a completely different definition. So could someone please just give me definitions for:

  • playersexual
  • pansexual
  • omnisexual

Note: I don't think I should have to mention this but while it's fine to debate the definitions in this topic, please, please, please don't argue over which system is better. Is that too hard BSN? 



#2
Allan Schumacher

Allan Schumacher
  • BioWare Employees
  • 7 640 messages

Playersexuality is a term that people use to mean that the romance option's sexual orientation is tailored to the way the game player would like it to be.

 

Pansexuality is the idea that one is attracted to all sexualities/genders  (it's a wider scale than just bisexuality).  Omnisexuality is a synonym.


  • spirosz, Naesaki, deuce985 et 8 autres aiment ceci

#3
David Gaider

David Gaider
  • BioWare Employees
  • 4 514 messages

We could only call Merrill 'playersexual' if we had proof of it. Like if she told FemHawke "Oh yeah, I'm totally only into women", but told ManHawke "Oh yeah, totally only into guys". As you said yourself, we have nothing to define her romantic inclinations by, except her entanglement with Hawke.

In other words, Merrill's sexuality is purposefully left vague. That is not playersexual.

 

At the root of the concern is the insistence of some players that their perception dictates the fact. For instance, if someone doesn't come out and state outright that they're attracted to members of the same gender, then they're heterosexual by default...and them stating differently later on must mean they've been ret-conned for the player's benefit.

 

As you state, the sexuality of some characters was left vague so it was open to interpretation by the player—but some people don't want interpretations, they want labels. Bisexuality is inherently indecisive and character-breaking in that case, since the perception would then be that the characters are altering their sexuality...like a light switch that goes from "completely straight" to "completely gay", since those are the only points that exist.

 

I get it, even if I don't agree with the assessment.

 

Insofar as what we're doing for DAI romances, we've yet to discuss it. This particular discussion usually goes nowhere good, however, since there's a lot of ignorance and indignation that arises whenever the issue arises on these forums. I suggest that, if anyone has anything in particular to add, they do so thoughtfully and with some consideration in mind.


  • Maria Caliban, Leanansidhe, Tayah et 23 autres aiment ceci

#4
Allan Schumacher

Allan Schumacher
  • BioWare Employees
  • 7 640 messages

Removed some posts.  Please keep the snark out of this thread even if you feel that this topic is historically a hot spot.



#5
Allan Schumacher

Allan Schumacher
  • BioWare Employees
  • 7 640 messages

By that definition, playersexuality doesn't exist. I'd like to have some way to differentiate between characters who have defined sexualities and characters who don't. Can you suggest another term? "Undefined sexuality" is a bit clunky.

 

Anyway, at the moment people aren't using playersexual the way you are; if they use the term they use it my way. I'm OK with doing it your way myself, but you're just confusing the OP.

 

I agree that people use it more your way.

 

To use Merril's example, what makes her not a bisexual?



#6
Allan Schumacher

Allan Schumacher
  • BioWare Employees
  • 7 640 messages

Post #2 is an answer to the question....  How is it scaring you?


  • DrBlingzle aime ceci

#7
Allan Schumacher

Allan Schumacher
  • BioWare Employees
  • 7 640 messages

So if I am a ''feminine'' male, do I call myself a woman?

 

No.  But if you identify as a woman, you're free to refer to yourself as one.  Admittedly I'm very much NOT an expert on this sort of stuff, but I think that is how trans people feel (at least in some capacity).

Though others are free to correct me if I am wrong.


  • bandcandy aime ceci

#8
Allan Schumacher

Allan Schumacher
  • BioWare Employees
  • 7 640 messages

I won't claim to understand what it's like to be a trans person.  It's not something that I'm familiar with.  If someone were to ask me how I knew I was a man, I'd probably use the biological indicators as well.

 

For other people that doesn't seem to be the case, and in all honesty it's not really any skin off my back if that's the way they see it.


  • oceanicsurvivor, WoolyJoe, Darth Krytie et 5 autres aiment ceci

#9
Allan Schumacher

Allan Schumacher
  • BioWare Employees
  • 7 640 messages

There will always be people that can not accept homosexuality. Always. If no one knows what you are into no one can judge you. This is not the main reason I feel the way I do, but it is an aspect that would make a lot of problems disappear.

 

 

This comes across as a suggestion that homosexuals should just hide an aspect of their character, which is a huge part of the problem and precisely the reason why I think Pride parades probably still need to keep happening.  They can stop when people are comfortable with non-heterosexual preferences and aren't suggesting that we should have a heterosexual pride parade in response.

 

 

In any case, this thread has gone way off topic and I thank a few people for some of the excellent explanations they gave for the OP's question.


  • Andraste_Reborn, TheRealJayDee, daveliam et 13 autres aiment ceci