In our own modern society we seem to accept the notion there needs to be some degree of control over the ownership and transfer of various weapons and substances, in order to better safeguard the community. We only tend to disagree on the nature of that control, I think.
How much harder would it be, if the weapons were so innate they were little more than manifestations of someone's emotions? Lose control of your temper and you can obliterate a street block with little more than a thought, for instance. Really, we're supposed to find it unreasonable, that in a world such as that they'd impose controls over such chances? That they'd not act to secure the community as a whole from any such possibility?
Makes me think of Redcliffe, actually. A whole town of people, savaged and brutalized, killed outright or tormented at length -- and all by one single tiny mage who lost control! Sorry, but no. I don't blame the common, ordinary people from feeling fear enough over such possibilities that they'd look for some kind of solution, some sort of control. Why would anyone feel different facing an entire Tower full of such mages, even? Normal, rational people don't look at such a situation and think, "Oh, gee. It would be so terribly mean to defend ourselves and our community, here. Let's only be nice to them ..."
I think it's a good man, rather, who looks at such situations and rages, but doesn't act out of hand. He doesn't go rushing in there, sword blazing -- he presents his argument to those in charge and then grudgingly subsides. He takes the time to heal but never forgets the chance and the danger. He doesn't go off dragging mages into the friggin' sewers to rape and tranquil them. He even steps in front of blades that would kill them, rather. This is a good man struggling to find the best way along a very dangerous line, so that everyone is better off. Including mages, mind you.
No, I'm looking forward to getting to know more about that sort of man. Where he came from and what he's growing to be. It'll be so much fun!