138957 réponses à ce sujet

[Caja]

Okay, I am not sure I am not remember or I don't know them. Who is Fiona? Lambert? Adrian? (I played DAO, DAA and DA2 nothing else.) Can you help me guys?

I think they are characters from the books or comics, but I'm not entirely sure.

[Milan92]

Okay, I am not sure I am not remember or I don't know them. Who is Fiona? Lambert? Adrian? (I played DAO, DAA and DA2 nothing else.) Can you help me guys?

 

Lambert was the leader of the templars. Fiona is Grand Enchanter (Basically Vivienne's boss) and Adrian is a friend of Fiona and deeply hated character on the bsn

 

Those three appeared in the novel Asunder.

[LolaLei]

Fair enough

 

Did anybody see this? 

 

 

LMFAO! That's amazing!!!!!!!

[Boomshakalakalakaboom]

Fair enough

 

Did anybody see this? 

 

 

Best glitch ever! Run, pants! Seek your safety far from the breach!  

[LolaLei]

Seriously, that needs to stay in the game!

[Milan92]

"You want to get ants Varric? Because that's how you get ants."

[gamerSSV]

So I have been thinking a lot about this lately, but you know when the released the descriptions of each race and it said that the human rogue/warrior was the youngest of the family? Well I was thinking of making my rogue around the age of 23/24 because for me it fits. I feel if they were any older they would already well into their career in the chantry/order or married and starting a family of their own. Even the age of 23/24 is pushing it for where I think they would be in their life thus far (and certainly not still umming and ahing about their future). My question is, with Cullen being in his mid-30's, do any of you guys think that age difference might be a thing that the game picks up on and the LI maybe comment on it or even have a problem with it? Not that I think 10/11 years is a big deal, but Cullen may do or any of the other LI's might.

That's an excellent question! Now you made me curious. It would be interesting for the LIs to react to the age difference (in a positive or negative way).

[wiccame]

Fair enough

 

Did anybody see this? 

 

I think I have an apology to make to Oghren lol

[Chiantirose82]

Fair enough

 

Did anybody see this? 

 

 

 

Omg! It's the Shleets! Oghren was right! Run Inquisitor, ruuuuuun!!!!!

[LolaLei]

I think I have an apology to make to Oghren lol

 

... Shleets! He was right all along! 

[riverbanks]

So I have been thinking a lot about this lately, but you know when the released the descriptions of each race and it said that the human rogue/warrior was the youngest of the family? Well I was thinking of making my rogue around the age of 23/24 because for me it fits. I feel if they were any older they would already well into their career in the chantry/order or married and starting a family of their own. Even the age of 23/24 is pushing it for where I think they would be in their life thus far (and certainly not still umming and ahing about their future). My question is, with Cullen being in his mid-30's, do any of you guys think that age difference might be a thing that the game picks up on and the LI maybe comment on it or even have a problem with it? Not that I think 10/11 years is a big deal, but Cullen may do or any of the other LI's might.

 

I don't think the Trevelyan rogue/warrior is tied to any age range. Being the youngest doesn't make you necessarily young (as we were talking about in this thread, if your siblings are 50/49, at 48 you're still the youngest without being young), and the Chantry background is vague enough that you can roleplay any reason for your character to be as involved as you want. The background only says you were sent to the Chantry, not that it was a recent event. You can make your character be a very devoted Sister with a long Chantry career well on her way to becoming a Mother, you can make her a non-commital Affirmed Sister who only uses that title to pretend like you care... you can do anything you want.

 

My own Trevelyan is 33~34ish and has recently been sent to the Chantry exactly for failing to make anything of herself at an age when she should have been married with kids long ago, in example. Mommy was mad at the spinster drunkard daughter, and finally sent her kicking and screaming to the Chantry even this late in life just to be rid of this embarrassment to the family. I have another 37~38 y/o Trevelyan planned for a later playthrough who will have been a trained Templar with at least a good decade or more of Chantry service on her shoulders. It still fits within the parameters of the background, without forcing my Quizzes to be younger than I want them to be.

 

So, that said, I don't think there will be any age difference reaction, because your age is not set for any background, and there's no way for the game to recognize what you roleplay your Inquisitor's age to be. You could be a lot younger than Cullen, but you could also be the same age as him, and you could even play your Inquisitor to be a lot older than him, and he would have no way to "know" that.

[Boomshakalakalakaboom]

That's an excellent question! Now you made me curious. It would be interesting for the LIs to react to the age difference (in a positive or negative way).

 

My first playthrough is always with a rogue and is usually my cannon (besides dragon age 2 where I decided in the end that I liked that little sh*t of a brother far too much to let him die so I decided on a mage for my cannon) so when I write I generally have a human rogue inquisitor in mind and I always think to myself when I write a scene with Cullen "would he have a problem with her being a decade younger than him?"

[LolaLei]

I don't think the Trevelyan rogue/warrior is tied to any age range. Being the youngest doesn't make you necessarily young (as we were talking about in this thread, if your siblings are 50/49, at 48 you're still the youngest without being young), and the Chantry background is vague enough that you can roleplay any reason for your character to be as involved as you want. The background only says you were sent to the Chantry, not that it was a recent event. You can make your character be a very devoted Sister with a long Chantry career well on her way to becoming a Mother, you can make her a non-commital Affirmed Sister who only uses that title to pretend like you care... you can do anything you want.

 

My own Trevelyan is 33~34ish and has recently been sent to the Chantry exactly for failing to make anything of herself at an age when she should have been married with kids ages ago, in example. Mommy was mad at the spinster drunkard daughter, and finally sent her kicking and screaming to the Chantry even this late in life just to be rid of this embarrassment to the family.  It still fits within the parameters of the background, without forcing my Quizz to be younger than I want her to be.

 

So, that said, I don't think there will be any age difference reaction, because your age is not set for any background, and there's no way for the game to recognize what you roleplay your Inquisitor's age to be. You could be a lot younger than Cullen, but you could also be the same age as him, and you could even play your Inquisitor to be a lot older than him, and he would have no way to "know" that.

 

That's a clever way to roleplay it! 

 

Mine will have to be 28, 6 months off 29 (since I'm playing as myself)... though, I don't actually look 28/29 so she'll look younger even if she's technically pushing 30 (thank the Maker!)     

[Iceyone]

Fair enough

 

Did anybody see this? 

 

 

LOL...I can only imagine the hilarity at some of the boopers that the team found and created, they need to make a vid of them , I'd pay for that

 

Solas, IQ and Cass aren't even acknowledging the pants are there for fear that the fade green stuff is messing with their minds, none of them wants to own up to having seen them....The pants are a Lie!!!

[gamerSSV]

I don't think the Trevelyan rogue/warrior is tied to any age range. Being the youngest doesn't make you necessarily young (as we were talking about in this thread, if your siblings are 50/49, at 48 you're still the youngest without being young), and the Chantry background is vague enough that you can roleplay any reason for your character to be as involved as you want. The background only says you were sent to the Chantry, not that it was a recent event. You can make your character be a very devoted Sister with a long Chantry career well on her way to becoming a Mother, you can make her a non-commital Affirmed Sister who only uses that title to pretend like you care... you can do anything you want.

 

My own Trevelyan is 33~34ish and has recently been sent to the Chantry exactly for failing to make anything of herself at an age when she should have been married with kids ages ago, in example. Mommy was mad at the spinster drunkard daughter, and finally sent her kicking and screaming to the Chantry even this late in life just to be rid of this embarrassment to the family. I have another 37~38 y/o Trevelyan planned for a later playthrough who will have been a trained Templar with at least a good decade or more of Chantry service on her shoulders. It still fits within the parameters of the background, without forcing my Quizzes to be younger than I want them to be.

 

So, that said, I don't think there will be any age difference reaction, because your age is not set for any background, and there's no way for the game to recognize what you roleplay your Inquisitor's age to be. You could be a lot younger than Cullen, but you could also be the same age as him, and you could even play your Inquisitor to be a lot older than him, and he would have no way to "know" that.

It would have been fun to see the "age difference reaction"

[heretica]

Best glitch ever! Run, pants! Seek your safety far from the breach!  

 

I was drinking and almost die here of a cough attack. 

 

Still laughing... 

[R2s Muse]

So I have been thinking a lot about this lately, but you know when the released the descriptions of each race and it said that the human rogue/warrior was the youngest of the family? Well I was thinking of making my rogue around the age of 23/24 because for me it fits. I feel if they were any older they would already well into their career in the chantry/order or married and starting a family of their own. Even the age of 23/24 is pushing it for where I think they would be in their life thus far (and certainly not still umming and ahing about their future). My question is, with Cullen being in his mid-30's, do any of you guys think that age difference might be a thing that the game picks up on and the LI maybe comment on it or even have a problem with it? Not that I think 10/11 years is a big deal, but Cullen may do or any of the other LI's might.

Patrick Weekes said something on tumblr recently about how you can pick whatever age you want for your character, and I got the impression that it wouldn't change much because you're just headcanoning it. So I'd be really surprised if you somehow picked an age that the game knows about. I mean, how it would it know that you think your character is 20 or 40, unless you specify a number somewhere? Plus, given that the devs always seem kinda cagey about giving exact ages on their characters, I doubt the exact numbers would ever become an issue. Anyhoo, that's my two cents. 

[R2s Muse]

Fair enough

 

Did anybody see this? 

 

OMG! Where did you find this? Was it in one of the demos online?

[gamerSSV]

My first playthrough is always with a rogue and is usually my cannon (besides dragon age 2 where I decided in the end that I liked that little sh*t of a brother far too much to let him die so I decided on a mage for my cannon) so when I write I generally have a human rogue inquisitor in mind and I always think to myself when I write a scene with Cullen "would he have a problem with her being a decade younger than him?"

My thoughts exactly. Honestly, I would have loooooved to have this in DAI. To see what Cullen thinks of it, how he reacts. Would he have a problem with it? 

[Ananka]

Fair enough

 

Did anybody see this? 

 

 

That's a beautiful glitch.

[Boomshakalakalakaboom]

I don't think the Trevelyan rogue/warrior is tied to any age range. Being the youngest doesn't make you necessarily young (as we were talking about in this thread, if your siblings are 50/49, at 48 you're still the youngest without being young), and the Chantry background is vague enough that you can roleplay any reason for your character to be as involved as you want. The background only says you were sent to the Chantry, not that it was a recent event. You can make your character be a very devoted Sister with a long Chantry career well on her way to becoming a Mother, you can make her a non-commital Affirmed Sister who only uses that title to pretend like you care... you can do anything you want.

 

My own Trevelyan is 33~34ish and has recently been sent to the Chantry exactly for failing to make anything of herself at an age when she should have been married with kids long ago, in example. Mommy was mad at the spinster drunkard daughter, and finally sent her kicking and screaming to the Chantry even this late in life just to be rid of this embarrassment to the family. I have another 37~38 y/o Trevelyan planned for a later playthrough who will have been a trained Templar with at least a good decade or more of Chantry service on her shoulders. It still fits within the parameters of the background, without forcing my Quizzes to be younger than I want them to be.

 

So, that said, I don't think there will be any age difference reaction, because your age is not set for any background, and there's no way for the game to recognize what you roleplay your Inquisitor's age to be. You could be a lot younger than Cullen, but you could also be the same age as him, and you could even play your Inquisitor to be a lot older than him, and he would have no way to "know" that.

 

Ah, I so see your point of view! That opens things up for me a bit. It was this part here that threw me "you were always expected to follow a similar path in service of the Maker" but yes, I can see now that it has been expected of you but you have chosen not to do it and spent a numerous amount of years avoiding it to finally be sent off to the conclave (if you were unwilling that is). And there is always it was expected of you and you wanted that life so have been a templar for so-and-so amount of years. Yay, your perspective has been awesome, thanks! I think my first play-through will be as the latter, a rogue already within the templar ranks. It is as shame there is only a templar specialization for a warrior so now I have a new question: what specialization would suit a rogue trained templar best? Artificer, assassin or tempest?

[R2s Muse]

I think it is more of a case where you are choosing who you will work with in the Inquisition. Do you want the mages help or do you want the templars? Kind of thing. Devs have stated that the actual mage/templar conflict will be solved quite early on in the game, if I recall correctly. But have never given hints on how you would go about doing that.

This is my impression of that question as well, that you'll end up picking one of them as an affiliating faction, like how you pick between the Dalish or the Werewolves, or the mages or templars to help you in the final battle in DA:O. 

 

Sadly, given that the templars in question clearly include the crazy@ss red templar version, that seems a little more clear cut than I would've expected. I'm really curious about how separate or together the red templars are compared with the 'regular' versions. If they're one in the same, that seems to make them pretty black hat wearing, IMO. 

[alwayshungry]

OMG! Where did you find this? Was it in one of the demos online?

It's from here after 1:40.

And here's the link from tumblr if you want to reblog it.

 

edit: http://blackwall.co....st/101781170371

[Panda]

There is no way I will be siding with either sides. That is some freaking bullshit. I refuse to chose from two bads if there is no chance of compromise I don't want anything to do with mages nor templars. I'm Pro-Circle which includes templars in the system and it's not either pro-mage or pro-templar, extremes are stupid.

 

Are they just kidding me right now

[Milan92]

OMG! Where did you find this? Was it in one of the demos online?

 

I don't know. I just came across it