That's a pretty wild leap of logic there, from a hand on the waist to heterosexual romances are generally submissive. Careful with the blanket statements, etc.
I think CuriousArtemis's point is that hetero romances almost always show the male being the assertive partner; I don't think dominant was meant in the DS sense. I personally prefer a romance that seems to be relatively equal with both partners being equally assertive (or not.) But those are my personal preferences, and I've accepted those will be the minority of romances I see, whether because women really do prefer the other or because that's what writers think they want. I love Cullen's romance, but I do have to imagine the reactions (probably loud) to a romance with a male LI with the roles reversed in the kiss and office scenes (and to me, if you can't reverse those roles, then there's clearly one person who is the assertive partner which I think was Artie's point.) I absolutely think in Cullen's romance that would have been dead wrong; he has too much trauma in his past not to wait for him to be ready and she wrote an almost perfect romance for Cullen. But Maker, I'd love to see a romance where that was possible. BW generally manages to be fairly respectful, thank goodness, and the kind of romances that get written are really nice, but it does leave out a chunk of the possibilities and some of us just are resigned to never seeing anything like what we want (and it's entirely possible there are all of two or three of us, though I don't think so, but we do exist.)





Retour en haut





















