Helpful & strict ain't always go opposite IMO. He can be "close" & care a lot about his men, but being strict on the same thing. In what I understand from Cullen is that he's very very strict to himself & his men & expect everyone to have a high standard. I personally believe the more he care about his men, the stricter he'll be. Sometimes being strict to a high standard can save his men's life no? If you're sloppy with your training the chance you'll get killed increase. That does not stop him to actually care a lot & be close to his men.
Yea I remember talking a lot to Rylen because of Cullen...
It's too bad we don't have Rylen-Cullen direct convo, it'll be interesting. Rylen was a templar too...
Exactly! "Strict" in the military doesn't have the negative meanings it can have in non-military life. Harsh is another thing entirely, of course, and Cullen's definitely not harsh. Of course, I think of these things as ex-military myself. Sloppy unit discipline, disrespect for officers, all can lead to disasters in the field when men don't react immediately to orders. A "soft" officer or sergeant would be pulled from command immediately by any good general.
In fact before we knew Cullen was with the Inquisition from the beginning, I pictured him arriving at Haven to find a Trevelyan warrior chewing someone out colorfully because she was trained for military command, then explaining to him that being soft on them meant they wouldn't be well trained and would be more likely to get killed (which is rather different than the kind of training knights would receive because it isn't focused on personal heroics but on unit cohesion and effectiveness.) I'm kind of sorry that they gloss over the difference between the two, honestly, though the idea that Templars are trained as both knights and as military units makes some sense (I wouldn't have gotten that from DAO, though.) But I also realize that's a distinction that very few people would be aware of (and fewer care about, lol.)





Retour en haut






