Still I was hoping for a glimpse of frostbite Cullen or some clarification on his party status. I haven't been able to find any references myself but I thought I'd check in the all knowing Cullen thread to make sure.
Supposedly there was a mention that there will be banter regarding the LI. Someone else should probably clarify 
Supposedly there was a mention that there will be banter regarding the LI. Someone else should probably clarify
Ooooo!!!:
"Party banter is still a thing. And funny. People hassle the LI for dating the Inquisitor. #DAI"
I have an idea. Every time a troll posts, ignore them, don't respond, and post a sexy Cullen picture instead. 'Nuff said.
I've already been doing that, minus the sexy Cullen part 
I really enjoyed the teasing aspects of companion interaction in prior DA titles, so I'm really pleased to see that included again. Thanks for the update guys.
And a lot of people were speculating, companions can't really tease a LI during banter... unless that LI is also a companion 
This thread moves too fast, so please - can someone enlighten me, why you fans seem to be convinced, that Cullen is NPC? Has it slipped somewhere at the PAX?
As long as our first time in bed with him isn't in the Deep Roads.
(<--- still squicked out by the novels)
If you see a pool of water, get the **** outta there. No one wants to lay in the wet patch!
Bwahahaha! Love you guys. Indeed. Self-filling pool of water? Watch out for the spiders!!! And the ill-fated sex.
This thread moves too fast, so please - can someone enlighten me, why you fans seem to be convinced, that Cullen is NPC? Has it slipped somewhere at the PAX?
It's the whole 3/3/3 thing. We have pretty much 2 warriors confirmed so far: Cassandra and Iron Bull, then there was that Grey Warden dude who showed up in the Game Informer videos in the party, he's also a warrior. So where does that leave Cullen? The theory is as an important NPC.
Bwahahaha! Love you guys. Indeed. Self-filling pool of water? Watch out for the spiders!!! And the ill-fated sex.
Okay, I haven't read the earlier books; I DEMAND spoilers
And a lot of people were speculating, companions can't really tease a LI during banter... unless that LI is also a companion
This thread moves too fast, so please - can someone enlighten me, why you fans seem to be convinced, that Cullen is NPC? Has it slipped somewhere at the PAX?
This thread moves too fast, so please - can someone enlighten me, why you fans seem to be convinced, that Cullen is NPC? Has it slipped somewhere at the PAX?
No confirmation either way, but without confirmation of being a companion, I'd prefer to make myself feel better about the "lesser" option of Cullen being an NPC romance. So I've been double-timing my YAY NPC ROMANCE posts. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst, ya?
Also, 3/3/3 party configuration.
In other news, my angsty fic idea for page 500 kinda fell apart on me. NOT TO WORRY THOUGH I HAD A BACK UP PLAN.
Me
but no worries -- no need to credit.
CC I frickin' LOVE you!!!
INQUISITOR: Who put glitter on Cullen's gear?
VIVIENNE: What? A little bedazzling never hurt anyone.
INQUISITOR: [POINTS]
CULLEN: THIS IS THE ARMOR OF A KILLER.
Oh I hope she actually turns out a little bit like this. Please!
They confirmed the 3/3/3 class ratio in the party, and practically confirmed IB as a warrior companion. There's one spot for Cullen and the Warden, and since the latter appeared in a a GI video, some people assume he'll be in the party.
Wait what! So Warden might be a companion? How on earth would they manage that? Oh dear I've spent so much time fangirling in these companion threads that I'm starting to miss some important speculation.
To be fair they didn't clarify if they meant that every LI will be teased about their affair with the Inquisitor.
They confirmed the 3/3/3 class ratio in the party, and practically confirmed IB as a warrior companion. There's one spot for Cullen and the Warden, and since the latter appeared in a a GI video, some people assume he'll be in the party.
Aha, so they confirmed 3/3/3, i've missed that one. Thank you.
Well, at least you'll have a reason to return to the Keep then. I remember stopping at Hawke's house only when there were new letters, and missing couple interactions with a Dog.
Wait what! So Warden might be a companion? How on earth would they manage that? Oh dear I've spent so much time fangirling in these companion threads that I'm starting to miss some important speculation.
No no no, not DAO Warden, a different character.
EDIT: The titular subject of this thread: Who is the Mysterious Bearded Warden?
Modifié par Phate Phoenix, 13 avril 2014 - 09:52 .
Sorry, I wasn't clear. There's a warrior speculated to be a companion that seems to be a Warden: He's also called Beardy or Feathers on BSN.Wait what! So Warden might be a companion? How on earth would they manage that? Oh dear I've spent so much time fangirling in these companion threads that I'm starting to miss some important speculation.
I went more often, but Yeah. Having characters with dialogues opening up from time to time is better.Aha, so they confirmed 3/3/3, i've missed that one. Thank you.
Well, at least you'll have a reason to return to the Keep then. I remember stopping at Hawke's house only when there were new letters, and missing couple interactions with a Dog.
No no no, not DAO Warden, a different character.
EDIT: The titular subject of this thread: Who is the Mysterious Bearded Warden?
OOOOHHHHHH RIGHT. Thanks for the clarification. I was massively confused for a moment there...
Well I hope Beardy fills the NPC advisor role then instead of Cullen. Beardy is older, wiser, and probably more battle weary. I think it'd make more sense to keep him out of battle.
Culleeeeeeeen! 
Okay, I haven't read the earlier books; I DEMAND spoilers
Stolen Throne and Calling Spoilers!!
OOOOHHHHHH RIGHT.
Well I hope Beardy fills the NPC advisor role then instead of Cullen. Beardy is older, wiser, and probably more battle weary. I think it'd make more sense to keep him out of battle.
Culleeeeeeeen!
But GW was in party in that video. They might have switched them of course, but it'd require a bit of rewriting for both characters.
Retour en haut
