I meant with him not being who he says he is lol
I just wasn't sure when I read your post.
I meant with him not being who he says he is lol
I just wasn't sure when I read your post.
If it ends up being Adrian, hopefully she is not railroaded into being an antagonist.
If it ends up being Adrian, hopefully she is not railroaded into being an antagonist.
With her views, there will be no railroading required.
I'd prefer the option to side with her, I like "spicing" things up bit.
Get Out
I'd prefer the option to side with her, I like "spicing" things up bit.
Liar, liar. You want to burn her alive as much as I do.
ahahahahahah
![]()
![]()
![]()
TraiTor
With her views, there will be no railroading required.
She'll betray you 5 sec after you says "I'll help" ![]()
I feel that if Adrian shows up, we'll at least be presented with the option of killing her.
Which is why I don't think she will; I feel that Rhys needs to be involved with her plotline when it finally wraps up, however that happens.
A possessed Lambert for 500.
Possessed Lambert for 500, Alex!
I feel that if Adrian shows up, we'll at least be presented with the option of killing her.
Which is why I don't think she will; I feel that Rhys needs to be involved with her plotline when it finally wraps up, however that happens.
Unless there's a possibility we get more than one character from Asunder ![]()
I'd prefer the option to side with her, I like "spicing" things up bit.
That isn't true.
I would most certainly love such an option though I am ambivalent as to exactly why that is.
Unless there's a possibility we get more than one character from Asunder
Which is possible; I've said in another thread that I've never put out and out lying passed a game developer and I'm not about to start now.
But I'm also not going to be working under the assumption that they're lying, either.
Which is possible; I've said in another thread that I've never put out and out lying passed a game developer and I'm not about to start now.
But I'm also not going to be working under the assumption that they're lying, either.
I just meant maybe they're holding out.
Which is possible; I've said in another thread that I've never put out and out lying passed a game developer and I'm not about to start now.
But I'm also not going to be working under the assumption that they're lying, either.
Does Bioware have a Peter Molyneux?
What isn't true??
That.
It is not true.
I just meant maybe they're holding out.
Well if they said there's only going to be one and there turns out to be more than one, then they lied.
There's nothing particularly wrong with that kind of withholding of information. What would be wrong is if they lied by saying there was going to be more than one and it turned out their was only one, or that they said there'd be a character form Asunder and there wasn't.
Does Bioware have a Peter Molyneux?
Well, I remember for ME3, someone said that Javik would appear in the game regardless of whether or not you had the From Ashes DLC, which was an out and out lie. I don't know if that was Bioware or an EA marketing person, though.
Lying is lying.
Trust me, I know.
Well, I remember for ME3, someone said that Javik would appear in the game regardless of whether or not you had the From Ashes DLC, which was an out and out lie. I don't know if that was Bioware or an EA marketing person, though.
"We won't have an A,B,C ending." - Bioware about Mass Effect 3. ![]()
That.
It is not true.
lol okay, EOL, thank you for the note.
Well if they said there's only going to be one and there turns out to be more than one, then they lied.
There's nothing particularly wrong with that kind of withholding of information. What would be wrong is if they lied by saying there was going to be more than one and it turned out their was only one, or that they said there'd be a character form Asunder and there wasn't.
Would you prefer them to lie or only have one Asunder character?