I'm digging this ideal.
"We should tell King Markus what his adviser truly is, convince him to see the light."
I'm gonna be using Josephine. A lot.
Given how this usually works Josie should bring a mage along:
That is an excellent post to bring this thread to the 300th page.
Congratulations everyone! Here's to a 300 more!
Inquisitor: You actually want to send someone to Nevarra to convince the king that his advisor is not trustworthy, even though he is likely being controlled by blood mages?
Josephine: I'm sure we can convince him of the truth, and once that is done he will break free from the mind control. If he is being controlled at all.
Inquisitor: Lady Josephine, I will not have you risk yourself. Leliana, send your people to deal with this.
Leliana: Yes, Inquisitor.
Josephine: *prickly* If you believe that is the most prudent course, Inquisitor. *walks away*
Inquisitor: If you will excuse me, I believe I have some ruffled feathers to smoothe.
Cullen: Better you than me.
I don't consider 'delicate flower in need of protection' an attractive role for a grown woman to play. Especially not in a story about saving the world from demonic invasion.
But no one mentioned anything about Josephine being a delicate flower ![]()
EDIT: O wait nevermind, that last banter.
Happy Page 300, Scribblers! ![]()
You know what I think would be rather cute.
In my head cannon the Inquisitor works with Josephine on many many jobs, as he falls for her more, he starts to send her on less jobs, ya know; being overprotective.
Question is would Josephine understand why he's being so or argue with him about it or both.
I don't consider 'delicate flower in need of protection' an attractive role for a grown woman to play. Especially not in a story about saving the world from demonic invasion.
She can handle herself, if she's been a diplomat in Antiva for this long without getting hit by the Crows that's proof enough.
From a strategic standpoint sending her in to deal with a potential blood mage who may or may not have turned the King of Nevarra into a thrall doesn't seem like a good idea. Worst case scenario is that trying to convince the king doesn't work and we have a high-ranking member of the Inquisition in the hands of the Venatori.
Actually the worst case is she becomes enthralled by the Blood Mages and we have a mind controlled traitor as one of out top advisers.
You know what I think would be rather cute.
In my head cannon the Inquisitor works with Josephine on many many jobs, as he falls for her more, he starts to send her on less jobs, ya know; being overprotective.
Question is would Josephine understand why he's being so or argue with him about it or both.
You know, considering her being an Antivan Merchant Princess, I think she would understand why the Inquisitor is doing it since I bet her family has done the same thing. Now whether she likes it or not is a different story.
I don't consider 'delicate flower in need of protection' an attractive role for a grown woman to play. Especially not in a story about saving the world from demonic invasion.
She relies on wit, and charm to win her battles.
That won't won't work on some occasions, because occasionally you just need to kill people to get the job done.
You don't send a diplomat to be an assassin, well you don't if your smart.
I hope Josie can fight with some type of weapon if the keep is attacked.So what do you guys think she will use daggers or longsword?
A very, very sharp pen.
A very, very sharp pen.
I am thinking a feather pillow.
She seems the smothering type.
Poisoned tea cakes.
Don't fear the tea cakes!
I hope Josie can fight with some type of weapon if the keep is attacked.So what do you guys think she will use daggers or longsword?
I think if she has to fight, she would use what was available, which would most likely be a utility knife. Which is ironic since that kind of knife is known as the Murder Knife here, so the noncombatant has the most lethal weapon in the series.
Poisoned tea cakes.
Lady Olenna would be proud.
She relies on wit, and charm to win her battles.
That won't won't work on some occasions, because occasionally you just need to kill people to get the job done.
You don't send a diplomat to be an assassin, well you don't if your smart.
Why do you *need* to kill this person?
Why do you think Diplomacy might work on this approach? Beyond that, And the figure in question being an enemy operative and a possible blood mage, what legitimacy could come from not at least attempting his removal? By any means?
Besides, having a King as a blood thrall isn't something to be tolerated, or encouraged, The only real response to such a threat is violence, Blood magic compulsion is strong, whom is to say the King is even coherent under his sway?
Militant action and diplomacy both have their place, but you don't send in a diplomat when you need to kill someone, you send in soldiers.
And i acknowledge that, if you need military action you send in those who do it best.
Why do you think Diplomacy might work on this approach?
Beyond that, And the figure in question being an enemy operative and a possible blood mage, what legitimacy could come from not at least attempting his removal? By any means?