Aller au contenu

Photo

Leliana Returns?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
79 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Twister-XIII

Twister-XIII
  • Members
  • 2 messages

Leliana is one of my favourite character in DA:O and wonder if she will make a return in Inquisition as Playable or even Romance character? I really hope that she is :wub:  


  • Nethalf aime ceci

#2
Knight of Dane

Knight of Dane
  • Members
  • 7 451 messages

Probably not either playable or romanceable, she's already been there.

 

But I'd surprised if she didn't return in some form. Rumor has it she's a Inqusition advisor.



#3
themikefest

themikefest
  • Members
  • 21 607 messages

I like to hear more of her voice. If she is, I wonder if she would know what happened to the Warden if she romanced him/her if he/she survived DAO.


  • smoke and mirrors aime ceci

#4
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

I like to hear more of her voice. If she is, I wonder if she would know what happened to the Warden if she romanced him/her if he/she survived DAO.

She doesn't seem to at the end of DA2. 



#5
themikefest

themikefest
  • Members
  • 21 607 messages

She doesn't seem to at the end of DA2. 

True. She may just not want to talk about it and does her best to avoid it.



#6
Immelman

Immelman
  • Members
  • 80 messages

True. She may just not want to talk about it and does her best to avoid it.

Well I assume that her search for the warden and the champion are on behalf of the chantry, and if she is in fact witholding information about the warden because she cares about him/her more than her loyality to the chantry even if not romanced? I dont think so.



#7
GVulture

GVulture
  • Members
  • 1 520 messages

She doesn't seem to at the end of DA2. 

Seems to be the same glitch that buggers Zevran in dragon age II. If you played DLC, the imported save into Dragon Age II doesn't have your romance flagged.



#8
Spectre slayer

Spectre slayer
  • Members
  • 1 427 messages
She'll be in DAI, she's pretty much confirmed given her role at the end of Da2, her role in the 2 books, that she's one of the hands of the divine, appeared in the war room and coronation concepts, mentioned in the game informer cover story and in this article by Game Informer.

Another character who may be set to re-enter the Dragon Age ring? The redheaded, religious bard Leliana. “We’ve been building Leliana up to essentially act as an agent to the divine,” Laidlaw says. “I think it would be fair to expect that she might have some say, especially given her appearance at the end of Dragon Age II. But beyond that, mum’s the word.” Leliana has always represented faith and spirituality, often testing belief and being a way to question players about how they feel about the Maker. “As far as I can tell, if you look among our fans, people have a lot of strong opinions on [the Maker],” Gaider says. “It’s a good place to go.” 

http://www.gameinfor...PostPageIndex=2

She'll likely be an important npc/ advisor for the inquisition a direct line to Divine Justina which could come in handy, as for whether or not she'll be a romance option it might be possible but unlikely, also if you romanced her in DAO and she's a romance option you won't br able to romance her since our previous li's are off limits.
  • Cobra's_back aime ceci

#9
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

She'll likely be an important npc/ advisor for the inquisition a direct line to Divine Justina which could come in handy, as for whether or not she'll be a romance option it might be possible but unlikely, also if you romanced her in DAO and she's a romance option you won't br able to romance her since our previous li's are off limits.


That would be odd, since the Inquisition isn't part of the Chantry, the Inquisitor doesn't work for the Chantry, and I'd imagine some players would prefer to have a choice in how they deal with the Chantry, if at all.
  • smoke and mirrors aime ceci

#10
Spectre slayer

Spectre slayer
  • Members
  • 1 427 messages

That would be odd, since the Inquisition isn't part of the Chantry, the Inquisitor doesn't work for the Chantry, and I'd imagine some players would prefer to have a choice in how they deal with the Chantry, if at all.

Not really, our main tasks is to bring order to all of the chaos going on and seal the tears, this includes possibly dealing with the divine and the chantry if we want to, her being the divines agent could be very useful depending on how we play the game. Say we start investigating the chantry and uncover some secrets that the higher ups don't want people to know, we could go to her for advice on what to do given her knowledge as a bard, as the agent of the divine, her knowledge of both the chantry and the divine herself.

They indicated during the demo that we can tip the balance of power in the mage vs templar conflict, and since it's one of the arcs why not use things at your disposal? I want to solve as much as I can somewhat peacefully and will use whater tools, secrets, information to do it.

That's the point, it would be completely optional if you wanted to have the option you could take it, if not then you could find another way. Just because we don't work for the divine or the chantry or even have to side with them doesn't mean we can't use them in someway or even have to listen to them or her.

I didn't really imply anything like that or even said anything like that, I know that whatever we do, whoever we side with is completely up to us and we don't even have to think siding or using them in someway is a goodthing, or even like them, it all comes down to player choice and personal views.

#11
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

That would be odd, since the Inquisition isn't part of the Chantry, the Inquisitor doesn't work for the Chantry, and I'd imagine some players would prefer to have a choice in how they deal with the Chantry, if at all.

Who do you think starts the funding of the organization? We already have Cassandra, so the Chantry is at least partially helping us out, so why not Leliana as well?


  • Senya aime ceci

#12
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

That's the point, it would be completely optional if you wanted to have the option you could take it, if not then you could find another way. Just because we don't work for the divine or the chantry or even have to side with them doesn't mean we can't use them in someway or even have to listen to them or her.
I didn't really imply anything like that or even said anything like that, I know that whatever we do, whoever we side with is completely up to us and we don't even have to think siding or using them in someway is a goodthing, or even like them, it all comes down to player choice and personal views.


I misunderstood, then, since I often see people suggesting it might be mandatory. I could see it being optional, leaving it up to the player whether or not they wanted anything to do with the Chantry, since the developers have stressed the player isn't a "puppet of the church" and that the Inquisition is created "in opposition" to the Chantry. I can see Leliana as a potential ally for players who want to side with the Chantry. As long as it's left up to the player in how to deal with the myriad of factions in the narrative, I think the freedom of choice will make people happy.

#13
stuffystuffs

stuffystuffs
  • Members
  • 241 messages

I misunderstood, then, since I often see people suggesting it might be mandatory. I could see it being optional, leaving it up to the player whether or not they wanted anything to do with the Chantry, since the developers have stressed the player isn't a "puppet of the church" and that the Inquisition is created "in opposition" to the Chantry. I can see Leliana as a potential ally for players who want to side with the Chantry. As long as it's left up to the player in how to deal with the myriad of factions in the narrative, I think the freedom of choice will make people happy.

 

I don't think it will be so black and white.  I think you'll need the Chantry (at least their cash money) to get started.  You may need the help of some Chantry loyalists (Leliana/Cassandra/etc.) at various points.

 

However, they aren't going to force you to join the Chantry and praise up the Maker every day or something.  The Inquisitor ultimately has the powah in this set up.

 

I never heard anything about the Inquisition possibly being created to oppose the Chantry though. I thought it was to oppose the sky from ripping apart and spitting demons out.


  • Senya aime ceci

#14
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

I misunderstood, then, since I often see people suggesting it might be mandatory. I could see it being optional, leaving it up to the player whether or not they wanted anything to do with the Chantry, since the developers have stressed the player isn't a "puppet of the church" and that the Inquisition is created "in opposition" to the Chantry. I can see Leliana as a potential ally for players who want to side with the Chantry. As long as it's left up to the player in how to deal with the myriad of factions in the narrative, I think the freedom of choice will make people happy.

Again, I have yet to see them say you are in opposition. The most I've heard is that you can be in opposition.



#15
AgentMrOrange

AgentMrOrange
  • Members
  • 209 messages

Again, I have yet to see them say you are in opposition. The most I've heard is that you can be in opposition.

at 1:40


  • Hanako Ikezawa aime ceci

#16
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

at 1:40

Thank you, AgentMrOrange. ^_^

 

He says "In opposition of the Chantry's will", not "in opposition of the Chantry". Very different things there. 



#17
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Again, I have yet to see them say you are in opposition. The most I've heard is that you can be in opposition.


It's from this video: A Look Inside Dragon Age.

Laidlaw said we would be standing in "opposition to the Chantry will", while Mark Darrah said elsewhere that the Inquisition is created in opposition to the Chantry. Specifically, Darrah said, "In the chaos surrounding the beginning of the game, you're reforming the Inquisition, not as part of the Church, not a part of the Chantry, you actually stand apart from it, in fact, based on these events, actually in opposition to it."

Darrah also said: "This is very important to me. We're not... forcing you to any sort of stance in terms of what you think about mages, what you think about Templars, what you think about the role of magic in Dragon Age. That's going to be left to the player to decide." I like the emphasis on giving the player choice in defining who the protagonist is.

#18
stuffystuffs

stuffystuffs
  • Members
  • 241 messages

Does it mean you form the Inquisition in spite of the Chantry saying 'no' to it...or that the Chantry is corrupt/responsible for the events occurring?



#19
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

Does it mean you form the Inquisition in spite of the Chantry saying 'no' to it...or that the Chantry is corrupt/responsible for the events occurring?

Considering they give you at least one if not both of the Chantry's top agents, Cassandra and Leliana, I'm not seeing them as saying no.



#20
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Does it mean you form the Inquisition in spite of the Chantry saying 'no' to it...or that the Chantry is corrupt/responsible for the events occurring?


Beyond the quotes from the developers, there's not much else to go on. I think it means the Inquisition is neutral, and not beholden to the Chantry of Andraste. I get this impression from Laidlaw saying, "It's formed in opposition to the Chantry will." I think it means the player will determine who the protagonist sides with, who they agree with, and what needs to be done, rather than having these terms dictated for us.

#21
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 148 messages

I think it is safe to assume that Leliana won't be playable at all, at least if by playable we mean a playable protagonist and not just a companion or ally you can temporarily take control of in combat.

 

As for being one of the potential LIs...who knows? I'd lean towards 'probably not,' but there hasn't been much said about Leliana's role in DA:I.



#22
Queen of Evil

Queen of Evil
  • Members
  • 276 messages

I'm looking forward to seeing Leliana in Inquisition. I like the theory that she's one of our advisors, but then I wonder who's looking after the Devine from all the evil temply-wemplars and magy-wages if we have both her hands. But that's for a different thread. Asides from that I've no idea what role she may play.



#23
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

Beyond the quotes from the developers, there's not much else to go on. I think it means the Inquisition is neutral, and not beholden to the Chantry of Andraste. I get this impression from Laidlaw saying, "It's formed in opposition to the Chantry will." I think it means the player will determine who the protagonist sides with, who they agree with, and what needs to be done, rather than having these terms dictated for us.

It kind of reminds me of Mass Effect 2. You are working with Cerberus, but you can be opposed to Cerberus' will. Same here. Chantry funds you and gives you troops and connections, but you don't spread the Chant. 



#24
smoke and mirrors

smoke and mirrors
  • Members
  • 5 367 messages

I like to hear more of her voice.

 

I would love it too :wub:   Corinne Kempa :wub: :wub:

 
 

#25
ManOfSteel

ManOfSteel
  • Members
  • 3 716 messages

Leliana is my favourite character of the franchise so far, so I hope she returns. However, I'd want her in a role that would suit her character and do both herself and the game itself justice. No pointless cameos please.