Exactly the human powers need to allow it which won't happen as long as the elves use violence to attempt to achieve it.
Right. Change being ordained by a human prophet on the other hand...
Exactly the human powers need to allow it which won't happen as long as the elves use violence to attempt to achieve it.
Right. Change being ordained by a human prophet on the other hand...
Well, even in the same racial groups dissensions happen, total peace is utopic, conflicts are parts of live. Celene and Gaspard are a good exemple of that, human vs human.(By the way, they could have stoped this silly war whenever they wanted to). Otherwise I don't see why CE and human couldn't "get along" or at least improve their actual situation who is clearly bad.
Because Elven freedom lasting rests solely on humanity's goodwill which won't be earned by prolonging conflicts or starting them.
But isn't allowing innocents to suffer for your cause also injustice?
That's my point for the Elves freedom to stick humanity has to allow it. What's stopping Orlais when it recovers from attacking the elves for revenge or even if Orlais falls what's to stop the neighboring human nations from attacking the elves for territory?
Indeed. After reading the book, I'm finally getting why Loghain hates Orlais so much.
But the shoes!
Why couldn't Chevaliers just have initiates drink a gallon of milk out of a beer bong like other fraternities?
Because a game of whack-a-elf is much more entertaining.
Seriously, I imagine the point is to ensure the recruits can obey orders.
We have encountered a grand total of...two chevaliers. Let's wait a bit before condemning them all as some devious group in need of reform.
How about no. We've known they were a terrible group even since Liselle in Origins tells us her story of how she was almost raped by one and had to run to Ferelden to avoid them after they killed her brother who stopped said rape.
That plus their initiation, the Chevaliers have a heck of a hole to dig themselves out of before I say anything positive about them.
How about no. We've known they were a terrible group even since Lisette in Origins tells us her story of how she was almost raped by one and had to run to Ferelden to avoid them after they killed her brother who stopped said rape.
That plus their initiation, the Chevaliers have a heck of a hole to dig themselves out of before I say anything positive about them.
Because one of them was a rapist, the blame suddenly falls on all of them?
Well, I guess that disqualifies...every group in Thedas. Except for the Qunari.
The first novel gave me my clue
I mean they killed his dog and everything.
Because Elven freedom solely on humanity's goodwill which won't be earned by prolonging conflicts or starting them.
hah yes because if they won't start any conflicts human mercy and goodnes will make their life better oh wait it didn't rly worked for that centuries rather naive thinking fella but they have bigger chances by war than peace to get better treatment even if both are low.
That's why I changed my post, as Xil already pointed out?
Sorry. Didn't see you change it.
The first novel gave me my clue
That made me understand why he hated Orlais then. This book makes me understand why he kept hating them now.
Because one of them was a rapist, the blame suddenly falls on all of them?
A group of magisters breaks into the Golden City, and suddenly the blame falls on the rest of Thedosian mages?
cultural reform wont happen over night, and celene knew this, and was slowly changing it in favor of the elves.... but some people were impatient and wanted everything now instead of later, which in turn is going to lead to a lot more elven deaths.... mainly cause my inquisitor is gonna bring the hammah down
I mean they killed his dog and everything.
And raped his mother in front of him and his dad.
Sorry. Didn't see you change it.
That made me understand why he hated Orlais then. This book makes me understand why he kept hating them now.
It's okay! ![]()
Yeeeah, Orlais is incredibly viscous. I also find them to be very hypocritical, granted everyone can be, but they're truly at a whole other level.
That made me understand why he hated Orlais then. This book makes me understand why he kept hating them now.
Still chopped his head off though. ![]()
And raped his mother in front of him and his dad.
welp there it is
A group of magisters breaks into the Golden City, and suddenly the blame falls on the rest of Thedosian mages?
better safe than sorry...
Because one of them was a rapist, the blame suddenly falls on all of them?
"The chevalier are knights of the highest order. They are the most skilled in the world, their discipline formidable. For their service they are allowed... privileges. These privileges are not always fair... I was a victim once. They can do whatever they want to the lesser-born." - Liselle
Plus we also know they raped Loghain's mother, so it is not just one.
That plus them all literally being murderers, why should I view them positively?
Right. Change being ordained by a human prophet on the other hand...
Andraste didn't do it herself she had allies.
Do the Elves have any?
*not snark btw.*
better safe than sorry...
With a mindset like that at the cost of tons of lives, I understand why they'd be a bit angry now.
And raped his mother in front of him and his dad.
Yes, but it's killing his dog that really cheesed him off. I mean, he is Fereldan after all. They're not called dog-lords for nothing.
Andraste didn't do it herself she had allies.
Do the Elves have any?
*not snark btw.*
All of His faithful have an ally in the Inquisition.
Cultural reform over the course of 50, 100 years doesn't do enough for the people who are born in poverty, live in fear, and die ignominiously.
But is Briala's way any better?