This sounds like a tacit acknowledgement that the only functional difference between "blood magic" and "legitimate" magic is the arbitrary judgement of Chantry officials.
All human laws are arbitrary. Short of believing in literal commandments from an inherently legitimate figure such as a god, no one found some inherent rule or definition for 'this magic is okay' and 'this magic is bad.' Someone had to come up with the distinction. So there's no tacit aknowledgement that rules are arbitrary: there is a blatant and in-your-face 'no duh ****, laws are arbitrary.' No one has to make abuse a crime.
Mind you, the functional difference between 'blood magic' and 'legitimate' magic could be the functional difference of what they do and/or how they do it. Using blood as a component ingredient, as opposed to a fuel source and serving as mind control, is a functional difference. Based in the lore, this is a grey area with differing opinions. How much blood is used? What is the source? What are the effects? Is this a means of mental domination? Is it used to directly hurt someone?





Retour en haut




