ML telling us that that there would be no DLC companions because of fan anger over paying again for content they already own is made on the Friday the following Monday in answer to people raging about possible companion cuts DG post that. 2+2=4 all day long.
I still can't see any connection between cut DLC content and a cut companion who we already know about. They clearly didn't decide to just yank a whole companion out last Friday, so the idea that a scrapped DLC character implies that [Character X] is now cut is a bit hard to prove.
We don't know when the decision to cut the DLC character was made, nor if that character was anyone they've ever featured or who was in the survey. They might've redesigned the entire party multiple times since the decision to have no DLC person was made, who knows?
If they decided to cut, I dunno, a talking tree companion named Willow two years ago as a result of not doing Day One DLC, then we'd never know about her and she'd never have been included in any of the subsequent information, reveals, marketing materials, etc. Why are people assuming that it's someone who was shown much more recently, when it could be something we never knew about and now never will?
That last point was the essence of David's comments, I think. Complaining about DLC means having to deal with the fact that a companion concept won't come to fruition, and fans can't really have it both ways.





Retour en haut









