I'm getting confused. No, if it's not stated in lore that a character is bisexual then I don't just assume they're bisexual. If it's not stated in lore that they're straight or gay, then I don't assume they're straight or gay.
No, of course not; why on earth would you assume I'd think that?
Oh yes, as I said earlier, I can certainly see how it might be offensive to bi folks.
I think at this point it's best to agree to disagree. I'm seeing a disconnect somewhere in our conversation because I never said that you should assume that a character is a bisexual, nor did I say you should assume that a character is straight nor gay.
I don't make the same distinction between someone saying "If I don't see anything that tells me they are bisexual, then there's no reason to think that they are bisexual" as being different between video game characters or actual people. Especially when evidence CAN be shown that they ARE bisexual (all the companions in DA2 are capable of having sex with any gender character). Especially within context of referring to the fanbase as a whole, and not just the perspectives that you possess yourself.
I think this is in large part because we also have different perceptions on video game stories and the amount of freedom to craft, specifically, the narrative that you want for the entire game. I have had this discussion in different contexts with people (usually around player choice, and whether that means that the player should be able to choose a narrative path that they want and if that freedom isn't provided, then we have done them a disservice - it spawned out of ME3 ending discussion).
I'm not sure what you mean here, to be honest. The sentence doesn't make sense.
Because when I see people saying that a person isn't bisexual unless it's clearly shown, I see it as us providing opportunity for people to deny that a character is bisexual and it's often done for reasons that I find very uncomfortable. Note that this does NOT mean that when I see you saying that, it makes me uncomfortable. But you're not the only person that says stuff like that. I've been reasonably active on the boards since March 2012, and I've seen countless arguments from countless people on all sides of the argument. I'm much, MUCH more firmly against "everyone being bisexual is unrealistic" (since it's neither everyone, nor do I consider it sufficiently improbably that it's not "realistic") types of defenses for playersexuality.
I think I can understand why you don't see it the same way (since you see it as losing out on the opportunity to write your own story where in one playthrough, a character can be straight/gay/bi and that's an awesome freedom that you love), but I've seen and heard people get upset about it that I can appreciate their cries to not provide people with options for erasure. Sorry.