Ce sujet est fermé
I create many characters.
That's not fair!
Alright, on a serious note - let's say canon PT.
True but I don't think a radical bloodmage pro-mage freedom Hawke (who is even worse than Anders at the whole FREEEDOOOM) thing should've been able to romance him.
He like Anders should've had moderation gates. And bloodmage should've been an instant dealbreaker.
Oh yes, definitely. It was just nope, in my book. Even though I've tried, it felt very weird.
Promiscuity is not sexuality, its sexual appetite.
One can be promiscuous and Straight, one can be promiscuous and gay.
Honestly I know 3 pan people, and 1 Bi. 1 is very uncomfortable in any situation, 2 are on their second er...coupling with each other in a relationship. And the Bisexual is my gf and we are each others firsts.
Bisexual does not mean you have sex a lot. It does Not mean you find beauty in all its forms. It means you are capable of think 2 or more genders are hot.
That's fair enough. It's part of why I am inquiring about it, because I have read up on the idea of biological and environmental factors influencing sexuality. The idea of the fluidity of one's orientation and so forth, and what may (or may not) influence those things.
It may be, but I don't think it ought to be a consequence of his lifestyle though, so when assessing things such as the believability of a character I was hoping on examining the notions of "This person is believable because of X," rather than "This person is believable, and happens to have X."
For what it's worth, Inquisitor Julianos, I'd be lying if I said that I couldn't relate first hand to your perspective. It's something that I don't really believe so much anymore, but I had some people poke me and make me go "must this be the way things are" on a variety of topics, including sexuality.
Thanks for the answers, that's what I had hoped for as well.
But would you rather change your beliefs to romance a certain character, or would you look for a romance option, that would compliment your beliefs?
Depends I suppose.
I typically play characters that wouldn't change their beliefs just to get into a romance but beliefs may change/evolve due to other reasons. I suppose it's more the latter then.
It's also hard to say atm as we've never been faced with a choice like this.
That's fair enough. It's part of why I am inquiring about it, because I have read up on the idea of biological and environmental factors influencing sexuality. The idea of the fluidity of one's orientation and so forth, and what may (or may not) influence those things.
Exactly. It's an interesting topic because so many people view it differently. Some people find their sexuality fluid, others very rigid. I myself would have said I am 100% gay two years ago, no doubt about it. But recently, I have found my sexuality to be much more fluid than I had thought previously. And I always enjoy watching people from the outside, more or less, come in to discuss their own biases and beliefs, as you are doing. So kudos to you, Allan.
I agree on the BM. I was a moderate mage, which I think worked well in terms of Fenris's character. Anything more radical should have been closed off.
Yep. The rivalrymances work beautifully with moderate characters. Any stronger is where they start getting weird. Moderate rivalmances are 
Yep. The rivalrymances work beautifully with moderate characters. Any stronger is where they start getting weird. Moderate rivalmances are
I admit I'll miss the rivalmances a little
A person's sexual appetite is part of their sexuality.A person's sexual appetite is sometimes considered part of their sexual orientation depending on how you categorize asexuality.And that's all a person's sexuality.
I bet a Cullen x Mage Inquisitor would be really interesting playthrough, at least in regards to M/T war.
I wonder if since blood magic is out the window as a spec, Cullen won't have any real caveats with a mage lover.
That's not fair!
Alright, on a serious note - let's say canon PT.
Oh yes, definitely. It was just nope, in my book. Even though I've tried, it felt very weird.
Yeah I romanced him once with a complete psycho aggressive bloodmage Hawke and I got vibes that Fenris wasn't as over his slavery mindset as he claimed to be. He came right to heel with my aggressive Hawke. Like he found his Danarius replacement. Real squicky that was. Funny Hawke moderate all the way now.
Edit: heel not hell lol
Edit2: I can't spell :|
Modifié par Ryzaki, 24 avril 2014 - 09:55 .
I wonder if since blood magic is out the window as a spec, Cullen won't have any real caveats with a mage lover.
Unless the Mage is kind of an extremist, though I think you're onto something
I admit I'll miss the rivalmances a little
I will too 
They were pretty fun if you played them as funny Hawke XD
I wonder if since blood magic is out the window as a spec, Cullen won't have any real caveats with a mage lover.
Probably'll have issues with necromancer no?
I wonder if since blood magic is out the window as a spec, Cullen won't have any real caveats with a mage lover.
I'm not so certain. Blood magic could be a regular skill tree now, but even if not, there's always Necromancer, which Cullen definitely shouldn't approve, considering party comments in Quentin's lair.
Probably'll have issues with necromancer no?
I could see raising the dead as being a tad bit worrying to Cullen.
Wait...does this mean a Mortalitasi is gonna teach us?!!?!?!?
I just got so damn excited!
I could see raising the dead as being a tad bit worrying to Cullen.
Wait...does this mean a Mortalitasi is gonna teach us?!!?!?!?
I just got so damn excited!
??? wait they are?
??? wait they are?
I'm confused. A what now?
??? wait they are?
Nah, it's just that necromancy is a new mage spec, and the Mortalitasi are famous for their necromantic magic. So, I was just putting two and two together.
Nah, it's just that necromancy is a new mage spec, and the Mortalitasi are famous for their necromantic magic. So, I was just putting two and two together.
Ohhh
I doubt we'll see them in Inquisition, still not over that though 
I could see raising the dead as being a tad bit worrying to Cullen.
Wait...does this mean a Mortalitasi is gonna teach us?!!?!?!?
I just got so damn excited!
I wonder who would be more baffled, if that is to happen - Cassandra or Vivienne.
I could see that the inquisitor's personal beliefs/choices would gate romances, but I feel like those should have some wiggle room - ie, if you start the game anti-mage but want to romance Viviene, I think it is natural over the course of the game for you to start to see things her way and have a romance form later in the game, or vice-versa. I think gating it so that anti-mage characters would never be able to romance pro-mage characters would prevent character growth and interesting story arcs from forming.
I think if there are too many gates..gender, race, class, beliefs...we'll all end up with only one option or none at all.
SIOGFSOIDGIAOJSDJLKHGISDG DS;OGNMS I'M OUT OF LIKES
ELUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
I liked it for you.
Didn't know you could run out of likes...
Retour en haut
