Evidence suggests that attempting to argue with you is roughly as useful and interesting as headbutting a brick wall, and I suspect it would be similarly good for my face.
So instead of attacking my arguments you attack person that makes an argument i belive it is called Ad hominem. 
Besides if you aren't interested in arguing with me why you are cutting in conversation, you behavior seems contradictionary for someone who doesn't want to participate in discussion.
It seems "there is no point in arguing with you" is mere a facade that exist to hide your lack of arguments on given topic.
In all seriousness, TKS, you've not said anything in the last few pages that I haven't seen you say countless times before. I'm not interested in regurgitating the same arguments again and again and again. I'm not quite sure why you are.
False, im pretty sure i never argued that marjolaine is saner out of the two, if you have evidence that would contradict this i will gladly see you present it.
Why are people responding to tks? He clearly will never change his opinion and he advocates baby killing as a legitimate way of dealing with mages. If someone seriously advocates that, why bother trying to debate them?
You with this fallacious argument again? Provide any rational argument that would be against such solution instead "think about children man!" as appeal to emotions. I called you out at least three times on that you never provided one.