we have reaver and templar.... what else could be need.
IDK! Reaver was always my favorite. I feel like it is going to change majorly somehow because of the health regen thing (or lack thereof). Templar was always an "eh" for me but I guess it will be more useful this time around.
I am disappointed there is a lack of standard specializations for the rogue and mage classes, but elated that they did expand upon them with five new disciplines. Hopefully there are more coming, keeping it down to three a class I never liked, I always preferred the six/eight model, more options and more playthroughs that way.
Warriors really got the shaft though, didn't they? What about the fabled Juggernaut that was cut from Dragon Age II?
Which is the main reason DA3 doesn't really interest me much.
But why do you expect to play the game like it is about the mage/Templar war?
I'm intrigued by the Rift Mage specialization.
I wanted bloodmage....
For those who are disappointed that Blood Mage is not included, I'd like to point out that Necromancer probably overlaps quite a bit.
>The Inquisition, dedicated to sealing the tears in the Fade and stemming the tide of demons entering and destroying the world
>The Inquisitor, leading the Inquisition, making pacts with demons
Yeah, that doesn't really make any sense. At all. Blood magic would be a nonsensical specialization for the Inquisitor.
but we love nonsensical specializations, pies and beers.
PIES AND BEERS FOREVER ONE. I need the blood mage to play my hyprocritical mage inquistors and my sociopath bloodmage.
Which is the main reason DA3 doesn't really interest me much.
So why are you buying it then?
I need them to find a way to import the Mass Effect 3 vanguard, or at least the charge skill. And the ability to pretty much beat things to death with your bare hands. A very satisfying class to play after a frustrating day not strangling people at work.
Does this work for ya? 
Cameron: Blood magic is an interesting one. Pure blood magic in the lore of the game is really supposed to be a very evil power. In previous games it wasn't really perceived to be that way. We talked about it being that way in the lore, we'd talk about crazy mages who went down the blood magic route and how that would have nasty consequences. So in Inquisition if we can't bring that across, that consequence across then we won't do it. We're looking at a couple of different options that still give that quasi-evil kind of fantasy element without trying to go into the nitty gritty of blood magic conflicting with other elements, but we haven't landed on which one's going to be there.
So we recognise the problem and we're very cognisant of the fact that we may not be able to do blood magic, but we would certainly replace it with something pretty bad arse. I've seen some concepts of what that could be... I personally play evil people in games, and I've always been a blood mage, and I'd be quite happy to play these ones as well. Look ultimately the Inquisition is something that stands apart from the Chantry, so it's not like you as a player are beholden to them or beholden to being always good--you can be whatever you want to be. And if I want to be this bad arse necromancer kind of guy who fiddles with the spirit world I'm going to do it, because ultimately I'm going to do what has to be done to face this threat of the massive breach in the sky that threatens to swallow the world but also the threat of who is the puppet master behind that and all the other events that are taking place in the world at this time.
You certainly see a lot of different factions who would be able to step up and face this threat but are in a position of weakness for a number of different reasons. So someone is clearly behind all this, and that person is our main enemy in the game, and we have to do what we have to do. That's the loophole of the Inquisition, that they have the freedom to do what has to be done.
But why do you expect to play the game like it is about the mage/Templar war?
I'm hoping the MP (if DA3 has a MP) will revolve around the MvT war and I was going to RP a bloodmage.
For those who are disappointed that Blood Mage is not included, I'd like to point out that Necromancer probably overlaps quite a bit.
For those who are disappointed that Blood Mage is not included, I'd like to point out that Necromancer probably overlaps quite a bit.
I don't care about its lame replacment I wanted the bloodmage specialization.
I'm hoping the MP (if DA3 has a MP) will revolve around the MvT war and I was going to RP a bloodmage.
What does MP have to do with RPing a blood mage in SP?
So why are you buying it then?
I was going to buy it but now I'm just going to wait for news on what the MP will probably be like.
I was going to buy it but now I'm just going to wait for news on what the MP will probably be like.
That's if we're getting that kind of MP
I am a little surprised by the lack of Bard.
and a wee sad too.
What does MP have to do with RPing a blood mage in SP?
I have no interest in DA3's SP because I don't care about what this particular story will be about so I'm hoping the MP will be MvT oriented to justify me possibly buying the game.
That's if we're getting that kind of MP
Well if we don't get that kind of MP then I will just wait for them to make DA4 and see if i will be interested in the story they make for then i guess.
Which is the main reason DA3 doesn't really interest me much.
but you're buying it?
but you're buying it?
I will decide to buy it or not once they release info on what type of MP format DA3 will use.
Buying DAI for the MP instead of the SP?
I have already explained why I'm doing that and I really don't feel like saying it again.
In Origins you get it by selling a kid's soul to a demon.
Or not.
I'm liking the idea of the artificer, I tried building a char like that in DAO, it wasn't really supported all that well though. I'm hoping it has some unique crafting options, or keep upgrade options...or something. It would be nice to have a class that doesn't solely revolve around pure combat talents. Maybe I'm imagining it to be more of an engineer or sapper.
Retour en haut
