There's a difference between killing an enemy on the battlefield/to save the world, or killing an innocent just because a character feels like it. And, more, killing an innocent and THEN making a complete turnaround and continue on as a good member of the team(=wardens or inquisition).
I'm afraid neither Sten nor Cole are not capable of such elaborate schizophrenia(or, perhaps, are badly written in this particular regard). If a character slaughters children without thinking, without mercy, he will not suddenly turn around and become a helpful, understanding and absolutely loyal companion. I never believed that Sten could travel with a Warden who was a blood mage and remain calm(bar the Haven incident, but that had nothing to do with magic).
Either it's bad writing, or it's an unbelievable situation, or both. If Cole, being extremely emotionally disturbed in Asunder, will prove to be a competent and loyal character in DAI and never pull an Anders/Yoshimo, I'm afraid I will simply disbelieve this.
So I never took Sten into the party, apart from an introductory playthrough. He killed children in a fit of rage, yet he never had a single fit of rage afterwards. He speaks at length about dangerous mages and blood mages, yet a mage/blood mage Warden causes no complaints. Cole? He's extremely emotionally disturbed and dangerous to be around: an insight to his psyche in Asunder clearly tells me he's a killer ready to pounce - a careless word can set him off.
Either a new writer is going to go OOC and rewrite him completely, or Cole's sudden loyalty and goodness(consistent loyalty and goodness!) would simply be unbelievable to me, just like Sten's calm and reasonable behavior was.





Retour en haut









