That's it! That you're quite right! Don't you see? The fact is his existence contradict to the whole chantry's statement. That's why the subject is so appealing!
Mimic is to mimic something was already happened or is happening right now. Like you said, spirt can't even mimic a chair, can they mimic a human who can even age? Do you have any idea what that means?
Spoiler
i don't see it at all as a contradiction of The Chantry's position. Coles possession does not in anyway behave like a spirit possession. The only one anomoly in the whole thing is he doesn't look malformed. Cole devoured a child's soul, consumed the boy so totally that it is never manifested in Thedas, the only time it surfaces is in the world of dreams which is the one place where echos of the past still "exist" Aka Solas and his "lucid dreaming" within the fade allows him to see the past of ruins from the memories of people long dead. Cole in the very last scene clearly states that he is NOT the boy. Every Spirit possession we see the boy would still be a participating partner, yet its clear from cole, from what he says and does boy cole is not an active participant.
how is this not demon possession? I don't take what cole says to Rhys are truth either at least not along the lines cole said this therefore it MUST be true. the conversation he has at the end of the book shows he is a LOT more aware of things then he lets on with Rhys. He is not as "confussed" about who the boy cole is and he knows things the boy would never know like the templars where so ashamed that they forgot about the boy (some kind of clerical error?) that they removed all records of him. how would cole know that if he was just a naive boy-spirit? Seriously Rhys thinks Cole is human who is a hedge mage not a spirit/demon that possessed a child. And cole knows this isn't true but he says nothing to correct Rhys. How do we know its true? From tehconversation Cole has with lambert in the very last page of the book.
I also don't take lamberts assertion that his litany only works on demon's as truth either, simply because he's not a mage and his understanding may be limited to Someone saying "use this when you suspect a demon is controling someones mind." That doesn't actually mean it is only effective on demons only that it is a defense against demon mind control. Lambert isn't a mage so its reasonable for him not to know exactly how it works, only that it does work as he was told. I'm not selective in my scepticism I don't trust either Cole or lambert.
i don't see it at all as a contradiction of The Chantry's position. Coles possession does not in anyway behave like a spirit possession. The only one anomoly in the whole thing is he doesn't look malformed. Cole devoured a child's soul, consumed the boy so totally that it is never manifested in Thedas, the only time it surfaces is in the world of dreams which is the one place where echos of the past still "exist" Aka Solas and his "lucid dreaming" within the fade allows him to see the past of ruins from the memories of people long dead. Cole in the very last scene clearly states that he is NOT the boy. Every Spirit possession we see the boy would still be a participating partner, yet its clear from cole, from what he says and does boy cole is not an active participant.
how is this not demon possession? I don't take what cole says to Rhys are truth either at least not along the lines cole said this therefore it MUST be true. the conversation he has at the end of the book shows he is a LOT more aware of things then he lets on with Rhys. He is not as "confussed" about who the boy cole is and he knows things the boy would never know like the templars where so ashamed that they forgot about the boy (some kind of clerical error?) that they removed all records of him. how would cole know that if he was just a naive boy-spirit? Seriously Rhys thinks Cole is human who is a hedge mage not a spirit/demon that possessed a child. And cole knows this isn't true but he says nothing to correct Rhys. How do we know its true? From tehconversation Cole has with lambert in the very last page of the book.
I also don't take lamberts assertion that his litany only works on demon's as truth either, simply because he's not a mage and his understanding may be limited to Someone saying "use this when you suspect a demon is controling someones mind." That doesn't actually mean it is only effective on demons only that it is a defense against demon mind control. Lambert isn't a mage so its reasonable for him not to know exactly how it works, only that it does work as he was told. I'm not selective in my scepticism I don't trust either Cole or lambert.
How does cole contradict Chantry understanding?
Here is my logic, if the original Cole had long gone, this full set of human identity was entirely created by magic, then this fade entity is definitely contradict to the current Chantry’s understanding about how fade beings are lack of soul and creativity. He’s powerful, unique and dangerous indeed, thus I will treat him respectfully & gently and will thank for his benevolence.
But if the original Cole was somehow preserved by a spirit/demon and deeply affected it, like what I said, these is just a new type of abomination. No it doesn’t contradict to Chantry’s understanding, but you know how possession works, in these case, the Cole who lived in a tragic life, died in horrible pain, trapped between the immaterial realm and physical world, tormented by the fate of loneliness, consumed by demonic influence and still wants to protect innocents and help this world is the real Cole who has been neglected by you, not the demon, not anything else.
I will repeat it again , putting "demon non demon" talk aside, he is still much more positive than un-posessed Zevran, Isabella, Sten, Morrigan, Fenris and easily better than possessed Anders.
He is valuable to inquisition by many means and he is intriguing character, and his banters with Blackwall and Solas easily win the title "most psychedelic banter in DA series"
This same list keeps coming up whenever Cole's murders come up. The actions of these people, though also reprehensible, were not murder for murders sake. I'll address them individually:
Zeveran: he was essentially an attack dog. A slave soldier. He was raised and compelled to do murder by pain of death.
Isabella: Far more bluster than bite. Selfish to the point of allowing others to come to harm, but not seeking to directly inflicting that harm. The slaves she threw overboard were a difficult choice. Save them or herself and her crew.
Fenris: Much the same as Zeveran. Even after gaining his freedom, he never kills anyone that isn't either trying to kill or enslave him. Well except the magistrates boy.
Sten: An unfortunate case of PTSD. Losing the sword isn't why he killed that family. It was losing his men. Still reprehensible, but this was obviously a bout of PTSD being exhibited under the most unfortunate of circumstances.
Morrigan: More bluster with some naivete to boot. She doesn't kill anyone that the Warden isn't also trying to kill. Even sending the Warden after Flemeth, she knows ultimately Flemeth won't die. I don't know why she keeps turning up on this list, frankly.
Anders/ Justice: This is one I consider even worse than the creature Cole. It's like comparing Jack the Ripper to Timothy McVeigh. Both are awful in different ways.
This same list keeps coming up whenever Cole's murders come up. The actions of these people, though also reprehensible, were not murder for murders sake. I'll address them individually:
Zeveran: he was essentially an attack dog. A slave soldier. He was raised and compelled to do murder by pain of death.
Isabella: Far more bluster than bite. Selfish to the point of allowing others to come to harm, but not seeking to directly inflicting that harm. The slaves she threw overboard were a difficult choice. Save them or herself and her crew.
Fenris: Much the same as Zeveran. Even after gaining his freedom, he never kills anyone that isn't either trying to kill or enslave him. Well except the magistrates boy.
Sten: An unfortunate case of PTSD. Losing the sword isn't why he killed that family. It was losing his men. Still reprehensible, but this was obviously a bout of PTSD being exhibited under the most unfortunate of circumstances.
Morrigan: More bluster with some naivete to boot. She doesn't kill anyone that the Warden isn't also trying to kill. Even sending the Warden after Flemeth, she knows ultimately Flemeth won't die. I don't know why she keeps turning up on this list, frankly.
Anders/ Justice: This is one I consider even worse than the creature Cole. It's like comparing Jack the Ripper to Timothy McVeigh. Both are awful in different ways.
So hold up. You accept being indoctrinated as a way to not be responsible for your own actions (even though both Zevran and Fenris revel in their skills) but you don't accept psychosis as one? Or are you the guy who keeps trying to sell Cole as pure, 100% unadulterated demon?
The ends on result Cole pow is much more creative, positive and humane than the outcome and final transformation for any of those guys listed above. Morrigan been selfish to the bone and Cole as he is in inquisition selfless and tries to help not for "I helped" statement but for helping sake. The end result we have in inquisition and things he approves and disapproves is the person we should rely as DA:I Cole. He is better than any unesponsible selfish people of this list. Your judgment is biased, Fortlowe, at very least.
So hold up. You accept being indoctrinated as a way to not be responsible for your own actions (even though both Zevran and Fenris revel in their skills) but you don't accept psychosis as one? Or are you the guy who keeps trying to sell Cole as pure, 100% unadulterated demon?
Cole kills trapped people for no reason than it likes to. Demon or spirit or whatever it's called in the end, The purpose of its murders was murder. Even Anders/Justice isn't guilty of that.
Cole kills trapped people for no reason that it likes to. Demon or spirit or whatever it's called in the end, The purpose of its murders was murder. Even Anderson/Justice isn't guilty of that.
Cole approves helping people and helps people in Inquisition. Your information Is outdated. He does not do that anymore. We talking about Cole in scope of Inquisition where we have his transformation. And it is the person which is more positive than people in list above.
Cole kills trapped people for no reason that it likes to. Demon or spirit or whatever it's called in the end, The purpose of its murders was murder. Even Anderson/Justice isn't guilty of that.
Nope, it very specifically killed people because it thought it would fade away into nothingness if it did not. The same way Isabela put her life before dozens of slaves Cole put his before these forgotten, hopeless types. Whether or not he actually WOULD have faded away is irrelevant, what he BELIEVES is the important bit. Though to be fair this is Cole prior to his realization that he was a spirit/demon, current Cole is an unknown. I'm thinking he might be using this new empathy/helping thing of his as an alternative way to feed.
Nope, it very specifically killed people because it thought it would fade away into nothingness if it did not. The same way Isabela put her life before dozens of slaves Cole put his before these forgotten, hopeless types. Whether or not he actually WOULD have faded away is irrelevant, what he BELIEVES is the important bit. Though to be fair this is Cole prior to his realization that he was a spirit/demon, current Cole is an unknown. I'm thinking he might be using this new empathy/helping thing of his as an alternative way to feed.
No matter what for me he will be #1 in my first play through because he is interesting companion with all his story and transformations he gone through. I see him as assassin Wynne of sorts who also do not patronize on each opportunity.
Then you add Solas and Cassandra to the soup and save the work merging Aequtarian values with chantry moderates and create new religion and system where moderate mages are chantry believers who oversee mage educatuion and control both mages and reformed templars.
Nope, it very specifically killed people because it thought it would fade away into nothingness if it did not. The same way Isabela put her life before dozens of slaves Cole put his before these forgotten, hopeless types. Whether or not he actually WOULD have faded away is irrelevant, what he BELIEVES is the important bit. Though to be fair this is Cole prior to his realization that he was a spirit/demon, current Cole is an unknown. I'm thinking he might be using this new empathy/helping thing of his as an alternative way to feed.
It knew for a fact that it would not fade away if it didn't kill. That or it killed a lot more than six people.
Yeah. He is not cold killer anymore. He tries to solve own "problems" and if Inquisition helps him to do so there could be some value in that. The current state and his strife is something that even chatry will admire. The real chantry and not the one with fear and rotten ideals.
[quote name="Fredward" post="17695257" timestamp="1415465693"]Why do you think that?
Cole roamed the Spire for years before the murders started happening. So either it knew it could exist without killing, or it was killing the whole time.
This same list keeps coming up whenever Cole's murders come up. The actions of these people, though also reprehensible, were not murder for murders sake. I'll address them individually:
Zeveran: he was essentially an attack dog. A slave soldier. He was raised and compelled to do murder by pain of death.
Isabella: Far more bluster than bite. Selfish to the point of allowing others to come to harm, but not seeking to directly inflicting that harm. The slaves she threw overboard were a difficult choice. Save them or herself and her crew.
Fenris: Much the same as Zeveran. Even after gaining his freedom, he never kills anyone that isn't either trying to kill or enslave him. Well except the magistrates boy.
Sten: An unfortunate case of PTSD. Losing the sword isn't why he killed that family. It was losing his men. Still reprehensible, but this was obviously a bout of PTSD being exhibited under the most unfortunate of circumstances.
Morrigan: More bluster with some naivete to boot. She doesn't kill anyone that the Warden isn't also trying to kill. Even sending the Warden after Flemeth, she knows ultimately Flemeth won't die. I don't know why she keeps turning up on this list, frankly.
Anders/ Justice: This is one I consider even worse than the creature Cole. It's like comparing Jack the Ripper to Timothy McVeigh. Both are awful in different ways.
Murder is murder. Those people still had family that cared about them.
Cole roamed the Spire for years before the murders started happening. So either it knew it could exist without killing, or it was killing the whole time.
Or it was still fueled by boyCole during that time. For years though? You're sure about that? When did Rhys start seeing Cole?
Murder is murder. Those people still had family that cared about them.
Very true. However, the Assassin had no choice, even if he says he enjoys it, the runaway slave was defending himself, the pirate was saving her crew, and the soldier was traumatised to the point of madness.
Cole wanted to kill because killing made it feel good. No other reason.
Very true. However, the Assassin had no choice, even if he says he enjoys it, the runaway slave was defending himself, the pirate was saving her crew, and the soldier was traumatised to the point of madness.
Cole wanted to kill because killing made it feel good. No other reason.
Fact is, we still don't know his motivation for sure.
It is true, though. I have to agree. Homicide is still homicide no matter the reason; it's just as bad no matter what. It's still a selfish act that is committed for selfish purposes and reasons.