So I can understand your perspective and the reason for the SWTOR analogy, are you feeling deflated because you feel this will negatively affect some sort of representation in the game?
In part, because I really don't think BioWare's given good representation in past games. It wasn't until ME3 that we saw a set gay character, and even then it was only one, and lesbian options in BioWare games have always been with a bi-sexual companion (I'm not counting DA2 here, since that was player sexual), which has always felt to me less about representation and more about male fantasy (guys playing a guy character can hook up with them, but also lesbians are hot so we'll allow that as well).
It's also always felt like there's less choices with set sexuality with companions. Or not even felt; there is less choice. Want to play a lesbian Shepard but don't like Liara? Tough luck. Want a gay Warden but don't like Zevran? Well he's all you're getting.
I used SWTOR as an analogy because of my own experiences with it. I was very disappointed with the lack of same sex options, but I got the game anyway because I hoped they'd eventually add them in. Then I played for a year, still hoping the whole that they'd be added. Then the expansion was coming out where they were added, and I knew from beta testers that they'd stuffed it up, but I still bought and played the expansion anyway, because damn you BioWare for making fun games, and still with the hope they'd bring out a patch or something to fully include properly implemented same gender content, which they never did, and I know I'm not the only one who wanted that content who did what I did and bought and played the game, and I just can't help but feel if we'd all held off on buying the game BioWare would have seen it was an important thing to us and worked to include it into the game. A vote with your wallet type thing. And that was my point. No one does vote with their wallet, and so there's no major incentive on the part of the devs to do things differently.