104 réponses à ce sujet

[Ryzaki]

The GWs are stupid, though. Duncan (not telling anyone that a blight can only end if a GW kills the archdemon) and Riordan (throwing himself of a building) exemplify this in DA:O.

 

Yeah this.

 

I'm more concerned my PC will be caught up in the stupidity despite them having better things to do like ruling their Teynir.

[efd731]

OP is post bait, title is click bait, this thread has existed like 3 times Allready. Concerns are baseless, op is alarmist, only legitimate concerns(Keep) has been addressed (for OP) multiple times in other threads(made by OP).

[thecanoness]

1. That Commander Shepard isn't in it.

 

This. 

 

But more seriously, I mostly just want a female inquisitor trailer. Please?

[superdeathdealer14]

The only real concern I have is; EA making me pay 30 dollars for DLCs that are worth 12.

[Chari]

Only one: too little dialogues and choices in dialogues

[TKavatar]

The cake is a lie and the emergent AI is a joke, your choices will not matter and you will be railroaded just like in DA2, graphics will be dumbed down and we lose those amazing terrain aware animations we saw in the Pax demo, not being able to get rid of annoying companions and microtransactions.

[Sylvius the Mad]

I fear being unable to play the character I designed.  I fear the paraphrase and the PC voice.

[Deflagratio]

I'm just worried in general that the game's showings could not be representative of the final product. A common concern these days I think. There's two parts though;

 

 

1. Misrepresentation is directly the fault of the Developer/Publisher. Things like (I hate this term) Bull-Shots or unrepresentative demos. (Oblivion's infamous Radiant AI)

 

2. Overselling. Equal fault Production-side/Consumer-Side. Trying to walk the line of ambiguity sometimes gives the consumer room to develop unreasonable expectations. Talk about amazing Customization/crafting, but then there's only three pieces of armor that can be recolored or skinned. Technically not a lie, but overstated allowing a false narrative to emerge.

[FlamenDialis]

i hate lists, but here goes...

 

as long as romances are tangential and optional, i don't care what bioware does with them. ever since the days when dave started looking for feedback from the ladies of nwn site, romance in bioware games has devolved. the game romances are necessarily limited and insular, and the fact that they have become little more than an ego-stroke mini-game makes them tacky. but that is my opinion. obviously many people like them, so as long as the romances continue to be optional and insular (ironically those are the very elements that limit their potential,) i will not complain, or care.

 

cac? that is a horrible abbreviation/acronym. nevertheless, there isn't much of a correlation between the depth o' character generation options and the size of the game. do the biowarians still like to use the "zots" terminology? i guess it doesn't matter. if you are only concerned about your character's appearance at creation, then there could be some sharing of art zots, but those are the aspects of character generation that interest me the least. soooo

 

your third concern... well, i can't actually find a concern. you observe that the appearance and gameplay of da:i will differ from da:2 (presumably da2) but there isn't a specifically a concern attached to that recognition. 

 

i have no doubt that some people will have difficulty with importing-- people always have such problems. every bioware game that has had importing/exporting has involved problems minor and major.  if you want to go back to bg2, you will find a list of things that didn't work correctly with exporting. that being said, given that we are not continuing the story of the da:o or da2 protagonist, the exporting issues are somewhat limited. i was actually surprised by how little my da:o actions impacted da2 gameplay, and if we want to bring up the me3 fiasco... but we probably shouldn't. if i was continuing da:i with hawke, and my import were borked, i would be disappointed. da:i export import Will be broken for many people. you can count on that. *yawn*

 

your remaining concerns all require that da:i players will be stupid to the point of insensibility and/or that bioware is incompetent beyond belief. for instance, if bioware cannot handle introducing new characters such as Vivene to new players, they really should get out of the crpg business. no joke. 

 

to sum up, you are worried about non-traditional romance options and you are concerned that da:i is different. i, on the other hand, don't care about the bioware romance options, and i Hope that da:i is different. da2 did some things well, but to be perfectly honest, the game felt rushed. recognizing that da:i will be different doesn't guarantee that it will be good, but i am not complaining about a sea change change from da2.

[mopotter]

Multiplayer being shoehorned in

 

ME3-style ending

 

Returning characters being radically rewritten

Yeah.  These would be my biggest fears too.  

 

I'm not worried about anything else, Well, maybe the strategy stuff but that's just because it will take me a long while to figure it out, but that's what google and the message boards are for. 

[Eveangaline]

That I will not be able to give my qunari inquisitor truly massive horns she could poke yer eye out with.

[Tazmanius]

Top concern for me..as I have posted in another thread is the price.

Seems we Brits and probably all Europeans are being heavily ripped off by some sellers..especially if we wish to get the deluxe edition...

Cannot see how Origin justify prices of $84 and $100 dollars for standard and deluxe editions for people in the UK...a lot of piracy incoming at those sort of criminal prices I suspect.

Even if V.A.T is calculated into the price..i.e US price appears to be around 45 dollars..then cost to us in the uk should be about 55..instead we will be paying near double that..

[dutch_gamer]

Top concern for me..as I have posted in another thread is the price.
Seems we Brits and probably all Europeans are being heavily ripped off by some sellers..especially if we wish to get the deluxe edition...
Cannot see how Origin justify prices of $84 and $100 dollars for standard and deluxe editions for people in the UK...a lot of piracy incoming at those sort of criminal prices I suspect.
Even if V.A.T is calculated into the price..i.e US price appears to be around 45 dollars..then cost to us in the uk should be about 55..instead we will be paying near double that..

VAT is not yet included in the US price, so it would be more than 60 dollars, not less. As the dollar goes down in value it is hardly ever adjusted in the price, in part because physical copies for Europe are manufactured in Europe which warrants a higher price for digital copies of the game. There are likely other reasons for the game to be more expensive Europe, ie import laws.

[SilkieBantam]

Honestly everything I've seen so far regarding graphics, gameplay and exploration look great so I'm not really concerned about that. It'd be pretty hard for me to get more excited for the game at this point.

My only real concern about the game is fairly nitpicky; I'm kind of worried that all the male love interests will be obnoxious, whiny brats again like they were in DA2. 

[emlit]

Bugs.

[DRTJR]

That Sera won't be romance-able by a Male Elf.

[AventuroLegendary]

That Sera won't be romance-able by a Male Elf.

When was the last time Bioware restricted romance by race?

[efd731]

My #1 fear is that people will look at baseless fear/hate mongering threads all over the internet and be turned off the game for no actual reason.

Also, horribly written Articles by the major news sites, because apparently they lost the ability to fact check when they lost the ability to use spellcheck.

[Nashiktal]

I admit I have a general feeling of dress over inquisition. I've been burned bad by both bioware teams so while everything I have seen looks good, I can't help but think "hey, mass effect 3 looked good as well. Hey, dragon age 2 looked good as well."

I had fun with both games, but both games left a long lasting bitter taste in my mouth due to shortcomings I felt should not have happened with their budget and pedigree. I am still shocked to this day at the blatant asset reuse in da2. Then the mess that was ME 3, even outside the ending.

I have never been a fan of a studio that manages to confuse me so hard. They make great stuff but when they misstep, they misstep HARD.

[Remmirath]

I fear being unable to play the character I designed.  I fear the paraphrase and the PC voice.

This is my greatest fear as well, although since it is known that those two things will be in the game, it is more of a dread certainty at this point. It's a question of how badly those two things will hamper playing a character.

As for fears concerning things that are as yet unknown, I fear that combat will end up with too much reliance on flashy activated abilities, that it will again fall victim to overinflated and largely meaningless numbers, and that it will be as much of an annoying slog as it was in DA II (more hit points is not the way to make opponents challenging, and neither is wave upon wave for almost all combats).

I'm also concerned about the rumours that previous PCs might show up in some fashion. I can see that going dreadfully wrong, and it gives me an uneasy feeling. I've never approved of the DM taking someone's old character over for a plot in a later campaign, and I feel no differently about this, unless it ends up being very carefully handled indeed. I'm hoping, however, that the rumours are only rumours, and mention is all that we'll be seeing.

[kasanza]

I really like the combat mechanics in DA2, but I heard Devs saying it will be somewhere between DAO and DA2. Also, when I watched the warrior fighting, I felt UNDERWHELMED. My main fear is combat will be boring and not hands-on. I love RPG's, but I like some skill and strategy in my fights and I want to be able to set up tactics so I don't have to swap between four toons.

 

I feel like I'm going to be OVERWHELMED by the need to take over castles and command an army, or whatever. I just want that classic D&D feel of setting out and gaining power while meeting a few companions. I've never been a fan of those Sims-type games where you build an empire.

[Vaseldwa]

I have this fear that our inquisitor is going to die at the end or our LI will die no matter what! I am also afraid they may pull a FFX  kind of ending! 

[Bichaneca]

I have this fear that our inquisitor is going to die at the end or our LI will die no matter what! I am also afraid they may pull a FFX  kind of ending! 

I also have this feeling that the Inquisitor is going to die in the end, sacrificing him/herself to close the last and biggest tear. It would be dramatic and sort of cool, but at the same time I hope they give us an option to live as well. Different endings should fit different Inquisitors.

[Iakus]

I also have this feeling that the Inquisitor is going to die in the end, sacrificing him/herself to close the last and biggest tear. It would be dramatic and sort of cool, but at the same time I hope they give us an option to live as well. Different endings should fit different Inquisitors.

 

After ME3, it would be beyond foolish to have DAI end this way.

 

Sadly, I can't say it won't happen anyway.