I dunno, I'm rather enjoying myself

I dunno, I'm rather enjoying myself

Mages aren't a race, they are mutants within their own species.
Can two white people produce a black child? No.
Can two nonmages produce a mage? Yes.
Ergo it's not a race.
The funny thing is that 2 white people can produce a black child as long as one or both of them have black in them. It's INCREDIBLY unlikely, but possible.
And since it has been implied that magic used to be everywhere and in everyone, those nonmages could be assumed to both have at least one magic ancestor.
Granted I don't view mages as a race in the slightest.
The funny thing is that 2 white people can produce a black child as long as one or both of them have black in them. It's INCREDIBLY unlikely, but possible.
And since it has been implied that magic used to be everywhere and in everyone, those nonmages could be assumed to both have at least one magic ancestor.
Granted I don't view mages as a race in the slightest.
That actually depends on all humans having originating ancestors who were all mages, which seems entirely unlikely. And dark pigmentation isn't usually a recessive trait, so the situation you described sounds like it'd be 100000000000 to 1 odds of happening. As far as has been shown, farmers and lower class people can give birth to mages, and I doubt they had some 4th or 5th generational mage blood in their veins to have pulled that off.
The funny thing is that 2 white people can produce a black child as long as one or both of them have black in them. It's INCREDIBLY unlikely, but possible.
And since it has been implied that magic used to be everywhere and in everyone, those nonmages could be assumed to both have at least one magic ancestor.
Granted I don't view mages as a race in the slightest.
You just said the magic words. no pun intended, they are black. House is talking of opposite ends of the spectrum, which should have been obvious.
As to the other response, you all need Jesus.
Mages are genetical. The more mage ancestors you have the more likely you are a mage. Altos Tevinter families give birth to mages in 90% cases, and have their mage roots going for hundreds of years.
Be that as it may, since we know of cases were both parents are mages yet the offspring of the coupling is NOT a mage, we can conclude that Magic is NOT genetical, and is determined by another sofar unknown factor.
Everything evolves through mutation. Mutants are new different species.
Nope. Unless you are about to claim that all of those humans who will be born without a sense of smell in the future, in fact aren't humans at all, but some new species...
Mutation is adaptation of an organism to changed conditions. Given the extent of the mutation, you can begin to argue taht it has indeed evolved into a new race, but minor changes (which we see every day, even in humans,) does not constitute a new species, or even race.
Racist would be an incorrect term. Supremacist would be more fitting. And the term "mundane" is already deregatory enough.
well, yeah, it is putting baseline humans down, but what do you expect, there's millions of normal humans (so many that mages would probably lose on principal if it came to a straight up fight - at least if they would not have time to prepare - because they would simply get swamped) so in a way yes, mages are special (does not mean that "mundanes" should just have to accept mage dominance or something though)
greetings LAX
ps: reminds me of a certain TELEPATH from a certain show happening on a certain space station
- "After all they are just mundanes"
^^
Defects, dead-ends, laborers...
Magic is not a minor change.
Nor is it geneological, which we just established makes Mages not a seperate race of their own..
Friendship sacks?
Mutants are new different species.
Yeah that why Albinos are considered to be a separate.....oh wait.
Can two white people produce a black child? No.
And albinos are a genetic anomaly, you also have albinos rabbits for example.
And that's what mages are: genetic anomalies.
And that's what mages are: genetic anomalies.