Aller au contenu

Photo

The Future of Cerberus


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
68 réponses à ce sujet

#1
s_legion00

s_legion00
  • Members
  • 17 messages

TIM  says that Cerberus is an idea and ideas cannot be killed. I pondered his words and realized there will always be a xenophobic lunatic and like-minded people. Maybe under a different name or mantle or form but Cerberus will be always be there.

 

What do you think is the future of Cerberus? Personally I think Cerberus is converted into a Human Preservation Society/Party by the Alliance and used as a defence ( similar to S.H.E.I.L.D in the Marvel Universe)

 

Discuss!



#2
TheOneTrueBioticGod

TheOneTrueBioticGod
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages

Yeah, the Alliance wants nothing to do with Cerberus. Really, post-war, chances are most of the galaxy is brought together, with the Salarians leading the way.

Yes, you will always have some rascist, xenophobic, incompetant, and idiotic terrorists ****. Doesn't mean they can do anything significant. 

And Cerberus can't be converted into anything; it's destroyed. There really aren't any remains. 

 

 

edited: removed inflammatory comment ~Mod05


#3
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 407 messages

Using your "SHIELD" analogy, I'd say Cerberus would be more like HYDRA.  Sure they are defeated and their leader dead, but there are still plenty of competent members in the vein of Petrovsky, who could keep the organization alive and on the down low.  Only the science division seems to be incompetent, their spies are incredibly effective, what with being able to steal and improve the Normandy design, and there are plenty of humans who are probably sympathetic to the cause.  

 

I could certainly see the Cerberus remnant operating in the shadows in a post ME3 world.  They wouldn't be able to reach the Sith Empire levels of power they magically got in ME3, but they could easily manipulate politics in the background while slowly building support.



#4
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 370 messages

Whatever happens to them, I think:

 

1)They'll be softened (like ME2 compared to ME1)

2)They'll be smaller (not the focus of 1/2 the combat in the game)

3)They'll be more morally grey (at least like ME2 compared to ME1 again)

4)They may change their name, be restructured in some sense

 

If they're going to exist at all.


  • DeathScepter aime ceci

#5
Deathsaurer

Deathsaurer
  • Members
  • 1 505 messages

Can we please skip Cerberus for a game or two?


  • SporkFu et TheOneTrueBioticGod aiment ceci

#6
TheOneTrueBioticGod

TheOneTrueBioticGod
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages

Can we please skip Cerberus for a game or two?



#7
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages

Hopefully there won't be one.



#8
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 370 messages

HAIL HYDRA


  • KaiserShep aime ceci

#9
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 516 messages

The return of Cerberus would show that Bioware have really run out of ideas for the MEU.



#10
cronshaw

cronshaw
  • Members
  • 4 997 messages

The Illusive Man is the Old God Baby in an alternate universe.

As such his soul will live on as the male child of Booker DeWitt, who isn't sold to Booker DeWitt

and travels back in time to become Commander Shepard who becomes a giant blue reaper and travels through a wormhole and ends up in the Black City

blah

blah 

blah



#11
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 806 messages
Dead people have no future.

#12
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 370 messages

The return of Cerberus would show that Bioware have really run out of ideas for the MEU.

 

In any way? Would the return of the Alliance mean that too?



#13
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

I'm sure it will be back... unfortunately. This is the organization that has after all that has managed to entrench itself into almost every single facet of the story.



#14
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages

I'm sure it will be back... unfortunately. This is the organization that has after all that has managed to entrench itself into almost every single facet of the story.

 

Metastasis.

 

We have a dire case of plot cancer here.



#15
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

TIM  says that Cerberus is an idea and ideas cannot be killed. I pondered his words and realized there will always be a xenophobic lunatic and like-minded people. Maybe under a different name or mantle or form but Cerberus will be always be there.

 

What do you think is the future of Cerberus? Personally I think Cerberus is converted into a Human Preservation Society/Party by the Alliance and used as a defence ( similar to S.H.E.I.L.D in the Marvel Universe)

 

Discuss!

 

My Shepard is one of such individuals who will carry on the ideology of Cerberus. He will also allow for the same methodology to be used. He'll be more quiet about it, but post-war, his reborn group (with Miranda also leading with him) will be in the shadows, influencing the galaxy and making humanity the political, economic, and even militarily dominant species while using Reaper tech to keep humanity ahead of the curve (they'll be more advanced with it, and willing to use it in unethical and immoral means). My Shepard will ensure that TIM's legacy, and the legacy of Cerberus, continues to push forward and prosper. It's out for the same gains as the prior Cerberus: for better or worse, to ensure the preservation and advancement of humanity in the universe, with or without the cooperation of aliens. They aren't xenophobic or racist or speciesist (and TIM's Cerberus wasn't either). They're well-intentioned extremists who believe that utopia justifies the means, regardless of the means used to get there. The galaxy will believe Shepard is dead, having died a hero. Shepard will use that goodwill to make the galaxy what it needs to be.



#16
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Yeah, the Alliance wants nothing to do with Cerberus. Really, post-war, chances are most of the galaxy is brought together, with the Salarians leading the way.

Yes, you will always have some rascist, xenophobic, incompetant, and idiotic terrorists (this is for you, Massively). Doesn't mean they can do anything significant. 

And Cerberus can't be converted into anything; it's destroyed. There really aren't any remains. 

 

That's a personal attack. Reported.



#17
DeathScepter

DeathScepter
  • Members
  • 5 527 messages

To ME, there will always be idiots. Remember they are good for test experiments and trolling. 



#18
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 370 messages

To ME, there will always be idiots. Remember they are good for test experiments and trolling. 

 

That's acting a little too much like TIM.



#19
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

To ME, there will always be idiots. Remember they are good for test experiments and trolling. 

 

Yep. Hell, if there's science to be had, and it's worth the trouble to go through with, experimentation et al. is on the table if its practical. I guess I should say that since I often expound the utility of such philosophy, that doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to go through with the methods every time. It's got to be worth the resources, and I'm not a guy who, despite my image here, really believes in pointless violence. I'm not going to burn 30 people just to figure out how to make a 3% increase in output from a starship reactor using Reaper tech - it's rather senseless.

 

Don't know if you're addressing me, yourself (as in the word 'me'), the games, or some combination of the 3. 



#20
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

That's acting a little too much like TIM.

 

Beyond being hyper-reckless with his technology and lacking oversight over his subordinates who got too messy and were noticed, I'm not really trying not to be like TIM. 



#21
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 370 messages

Beyond being hyper-reckless with his technology and lacking oversight over his subordinates who got too messy and were noticed, I'm not really trying not to be like TIM. 

 

I was really just joking.. in my head.

 

Test experiments - Sanctuary.

Trolling - "Diplomacy is good when it works, but not when everyone already perceives you as a threat." --> Proceeds to lie lie lie about stuff



#22
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

I was really just joking.. in my head.

 

Test experiments - Sanctuary.

Trolling - "Diplomacy is good when it works, but not when everyone already perceives you as a threat." --> Proceeds to lie lie lie about stuff

 

In my eyes, Sanctuary had justifiable utility.

 

As for diplomacy, the whole point of it is the exact same as violence. You use it to get what you want and/or need. Doesn't matter how you do it. 



#23
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages
Massively, there are times I wonder how much difference there is between your galaxy and Xil's. You choose to elevate humanity instead of the Asari (the portion that wasn't pre-emptively exterminated during the war, anyway) and are a bit quieter about what you do (no seeker swarms to pacify demonstrations or indoctrinating dissenters). I'm curious how you'd define the distinction beyond that.

In my eyes, Sanctuary had justifiable utility.

Nowhere near enough to account for the cost, as I see it.

As for diplomacy, the whole point of it is the exact same as violence. You use it to get what you want and/or need. Doesn't matter how you do it.

Agreed. Violence is an escalation of the same. To borrow from Heinlein:

“If you wanted to teach a baby a lesson, would you cut its head off?”

“Why . . . no, sir!”

“Of course not. You’d paddle it. There can be circumstances when it’s just as foolish to hit an enemy city with an H-bomb as it would be to spank a baby with an ax. War is not violence and killing, pure and simple; war is controlled violence, for a purpose. The purpose of war is to support your government’s decisions by force. The purpose is never to kill the enemy just to be killing him . . . but to make him do what you want him to do. Not killing . . . but controlled and purposeful violence. But it’s not your business or mine to decide the purpose or the control. It’s never a soldier’s business to decide when or where or how—or why—he fights; that belongs to the statesmen and the generals. The statesmen decide why and how much; the generals take it from there and tell us where and when and how. We supply the violence; other people -- ‘older and wiser heads,’ as they say -- supply the control. Which is as it should be. That’s the best answer I can give you. If it doesn’t satisfy you, I’ll get you a chit to go talk to the regimental commander. If he can’t convince you—then go home and be a civilian! Because in that case you will certainly never make a soldier.”


~Robert A. Heinlein, “Starship Troopers.”
  • Jukaga aime ceci

#24
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 370 messages

This is where I realize my headcanon still pales compared to some others.



#25
AlexMBrennan

AlexMBrennan
  • Members
  • 7 002 messages

In any way? Would the return of the Alliance mean that too?

Why would you expect the Alliance to be absent? I mean, it if a dead supervillian randomly returns to life for the sequel then you could argue that the franchise is past it's prime but an arbitrarily picked organisation not disappearing between titles isn't nearly as bad.