I completely disagree as it pertains to Kirkwall. The mages clearly needed protecting in that environment. As evidenced by Karras and Alrik . Not to mention their goons not giving a damn about it, not enough to actually do anything anyway. The Circle mages were guilty of existing, nothing more, nothing less.
Mages do need protecting. The First Enchanter is not the one to do it, any more than mages needing friends should turn to the Templars. Screwing up the roles and limits thereof is how the Kirkwall mess snowballed. The Knight Commander became involved (and likely distracted) in politics, the First Enchanter misunderstood the role of an advocate, the Chantry was indecesive when elements were secretly agitating for crisis.
I must have missed that part. Who were these "maleficars"? Unless you're talking about the midnight meetings where both templars and mages were working together(fancy that) to bring down the mad dog. So that the circle could run properly.
Uh, Quinten? Who we were just talking about? Quinten was active as early as act 1, years before Meredith got the idol, became unhinged, and asked for annulment while blood mages ran the street.
Mind you, Orisino's rational for hiding Quinten, who is about as indefensible as you can get, also covers any other misbehaving mage.
So she's willing to fight for her and her templars' livelihood and their rule over Kirkwall? Good for her.
Naughty naughty naughty. You claimed she wasn't good to anyone but her Templars. Now you're backpeddling to assign a motive she has never claimed. Even Anders would disagree with you about her intent.
Right, because Orsino had so much power in Kirkwall. I recall at one point he wasn't even allowed beyond the courtyard because his Templar Jailer said so.
I do believe your exact words were 'either ignorant or malevolent towards the mages who were made tranquil illegally.'





Retour en haut





