Big thing is that all 3 leaders of the sides of the Orlesian Civil War are not innocent and have despicable things. Personally, I think it's going to come down to what each person's goals are if they win the war. Here's what I think of each person so far:
Briala seems more focused on freeing the elves and getting them a home. She doesn't seem to have a goal on what to do after that I think and I think that is important. To me she has the best immediate moral ground for winning the war but her lack of planning for what would happen afterwards would probably lead to chaos.
Gaspard seems very patriotic and honorable but he is more militaristic in how he deals with problems it looks like. I also think that he if did win he'd tried to invade Fereldan again to regain Orlais' old territory
Celene would probably go back to her old plan of trying to get Orlais more progressive. She's ruthless and scheming in getting what she wants but is pretty much has good goals for people. She reminds a bit like Bhelen from DA:O where he was ruthless and scheming as well but had the good of his people in mind. I actually think she would try to free the elves from being second class citizens eventually or at least get Orlais progressive enough that they would be willing to accept such an idea.
Interesting point. Gaspard does in some ways remind me of harrowmont(honourable but old fashioned) whereas Celene does remind me of Bhelen(progressive but deeply unpleasant). Briala is the joker in the mix as someone comes across as having been the naive pawn of fellassen and used dupe of Celene. I wouldn't necessarily expect it to play out as a carbon copy of orzammar with unpleasant progressive being clear best choice.
Glad it has turned out that way as before hand I expected clear good vs evil and instead I found Celene's horribleness overwhelming the progressive vibe value whilst I crossed my fingers that the honourable Gaspard wasn't going to meet his ends despite his traditionalist vibe.





Retour en haut




