@ VAPAA : Omg, the discussion doesn't make sense anymore. XD
VAPAA writes : And you never adresses the fact that the unrest is rooted to the Chantry crisis, and that's how Gaspard gained influence, by being the man who could solve problems, in the eyes of the nobles
Why do I need to adress that point when the only thing that Celene has to do to satisfy them is using the might of the empire and being heavily involved in the name of safety ? ( what she isn't willing to do at this moment, hoping for some alternatives from the chantry ) It's also oversimplification to think that the nobles are behind Gaspard. Gaspard is not necessarily needed for most of the nobles. Some nobles see him as a great alternative, not necessarily the only way to go. Most of people blame Celene's weaknesses on the matter of the templar / mage war, because they think she is doing nothing. But once she shows she is doing something, once she strongly acts ( despite despising that solution ) isn't it logical that they could be happier with her ?
VAPAA WRITES : Now the reason why she didn't kill him, generally speaking, is because she had a plan for solving the Chantry crisis, and that with that victory, Gaspard's faction would be left with nothing of importance to use against her.
Gaspard during the hunt directly attacked her, speaking of treason, and directly said that she would pay her rejection of his offer, that all that would happen was because of her. How is it not obvious enough at least at this point to act against him before the situation got radically bad, even worse ? It was pretty clear that they were done and the war would really begin. After refusing the marriage she knew that Gaspard would act for real and she did nothing for weeks, wondering his next move and she was finally trapped. She has probably her reasons, willing to wait and see, but that was not a thing to do in my opinion.
VAPAA WRITES : You seemed to say that Celene could've win the nobles back because she's a master of the Game, but then you said she got cornered by Gaspard, so she could win them back or she couldn't ? [/quote]
My second post agreeing with yours only explained and justified why she got cornered by Gaspard in the book and why while she's one of the best player, it's also true that she can be mistaken and is not as smart as she believes. I never said that she was someone bad at the game and wouldn't be able to convince the nobles. She ruled the empire for 20 years after all. I don't see how aknowledging objectively her characterization and some mistakes makes it contradictory. But whatever you say.
VAPAA WRITES : Because that's not how Orlais work...or for that matter, ANY society works, Power is only useful if others recognize it, and if Celener were to suddently stomp over a heavily established tradition, everyone would turn against her, and she would be left with no support.
I don't even need to answer to that statement which doesn't mean anything. And there's definitely nothing that could even help to explain why everyone would turn against her if she did so.
VAPAA WRITES :Causes are always crucial to understand, yes Gaspard led the nobles, but he used her apparent inability to resolve the Chantry crisis, that was greatly concern for the nobles, to make his move, without him, the nobles would still be concerned and trustless, it could even ignite the situation if the nobles intrepreted the death of Gaspard as a unconsidered move by a ruler who kills the one they saw as the savior.
They would be angry but disorganized. Most of the nobles as it stated into the book are spectators, anxious and balance. Some might prefer Gaspard, but once he's dead, there would be only Celene. Only a minority is really behind Gaspard. The other nobles didn't side with anyone yet, even if among them there are people who might see Gaspard as an alternative. Like you said, thoses nobles are more concerned for the templar / mage war. I also don't see where Gaspard is considered as a savior. He's the only one asserting that he is the savior for Orlais. If nobles would have seen him as a savior, he shouldn't try hard to convince them to win them with arguments like he did with Chantral, or he shouldn't have to offer things and promises to Rematche to win him too. That's how Celene lost the Duke. I definitely don't see it. It's just about preferences, interests. They are not fanatics.
VAPAA WRITES : You are mixing things, the Chantry problem was to be resolved by the Divine, but on top of that came the elven rebellion, and rumors that she helfs the elves, and the only politicaly viable solution was to march on Halamshiral, but that was a show of strengh against the rumors on the elves, the Chantry problem was still to be resilved by the Divine
Now, I understand why I didn't follow you. I'm talking about the discussion between Leliana and Celene into the university at the beginning of the novel, about the templar / mage war; But I feel that it's better to give the sentences from the book.
" There are mens of Orlais who would sooner see us march upon our own people in the name of safety. I would despise that, dorothea knows I would. But I must offer them some alternative. Three weeks or at most, a month. Any longer and I will have no choice but to act. "
I hope thoses lines will open your eyes. I really can't do more. Celene would compromise her political ideals to satisfy the nobles, because she cares about her power.
VAPAA WRITES : It's what she wants for Orlais and why she fights for the throne, that's why she wouldn't marry Gaspard, because she knew it would just ruin that goal; Gaspard and her have mutually exclusive view of what what best for Orlais. It's NOT foolish semantics, her poilitical goal is to improve Orlais by culture and wisdom, her deal with Remarche wasn't going to jeopardize that, but marriying a warmonger like Gaspard (for exemple) was going to etc etc
Okay. You quoted my point arguing about how once Gaspard dead, Celene could try to win his faction, manipulate them, trying to divide them, etc. And you countered that she is a good player in the game but she still has political goals she doesn't want to compromise. It never was about Gaspard here. ( we know she can't stand the man and doesn't want to have anything to do with him ) But the nobles behind him. My point you quoted since the beginning was about trying to appease or convincing the nobles who prefered him, once Gaspard dead. She could totally act that way.
Seriously I give up because this discussion doesn't make sense at all. It goes in all the directions.