Agreed. However, logically there MUST be vast swaths of space that are not included within the network. The Milky Way contains on a super low estimate 200 billion stars. If the number of stars included on the network either via direct links to relays or indirectly via FTL travel in the immediate neighborhood is, at minimum, 1%. Then that is 2 billion potential star systems that can be reached through direct relay travel or a couple days travel at FTL.
Once you start increasing the number of stars that the relay network actually covers much more than that, it starts to strain credulity even more than it already does.
So I think it is safe to assume that no matter how expansive the network is, which is an unknown as you pointed out, there are likely a vast number of star systems not included within it.
And the separation between individual relays is likely large as well, as we already know that primary relays can span thousands of light years. Look how long it took the Reapers to reach the closest relay after Arrival, travelling (probably) 30 ly/day.
You're assuming that the Reapers can survey 2 billion stars but can't survey 200 billion. We've got no reason to make that assumption. "Credulity" is not an argument.
Edit: I've got no problem with saying that ME doesn't actually make sense, though.





Retour en haut







