82 réponses à ce sujet

[AlanC9]

Perfect? Yeah, right.

[fdgvdddvdfdfbdfb]

Warriors without the ability to dual wield weapons are laughable

lol really

[Realmzmaster]

I agree. Warriors without the ability to dual wield weapons are laughable and i would never consider playing even in my 100 playthrough. The only game i compromise is Witcher, but i play him mainly as alchemist and mage. Plus, CDProject Red listen to their fanbase and make everything else in the game perfect. They consider all kinds of feedback and add it in some form in their game, not only these suggestions which they find convenient.

The Witcher 2 is almost perfect? You mean I can play as a character other than Geralt? I can play a female character? Are you saying that combat in Witcher 2 is actually believable? Really? The combat in Witcher 2 is average at best. And some of the combat is simply not believable.

You really believe that warriors throughout history are laughable because they did not dual wield weapons? I wonder how they became experts at their particular weapons since they could not dual wield.

 

Asking for dual wielding for warriors in DA:I is fine. The posters who disagree with the OP are simply saying make it believable. No dual wielder used two longswords in combat. not if it put them at a disadvantage against their enemies. The video hat is referenced in this thread clearly at the beginning the presenter states that no warrior that he knew of dual wield two longswords in combat.

[tmp7704]

I agree. Warriors without the ability to dual wield weapons are laughable (..)

That's funny, given actual warriors seemed to prefer to be "laughable" even though there was nothing preventing them from dual wielding.

Having it as option in DA:O was nice I guess, but let's not act like not having it (especially in the all-out-dumb version) is that much of an offense. May as well rage at the lack of dual crossbows because hey, some games have done that now, too.

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Spoiler

I enjoy the heck out of duel-wielding as a warrior in DA:O.
Wearing heavy armor and just jabbing at your enemies with fast paced attacks just have this special feeling to it.

It's the type of class that you rarely see in other video games. Trully, how many times did you actually see a heavy armored warrior with two long swords? It's usually same ol' spears, or two handed weapons.

It doesn't hurt anyone to have the option in duel wielding for the warrior class.
I'm not sure why some people complain about briging this subject up. It was a fun build to play. And I looked good.

BioWare, if you're actually not planing to add duel-wielding for warriors, can you please just tell us?
There are many people who loved it, and these debates are not going to stop until we're sure if it'll be back or not.

[Flurdt Vash]

But does the Maker even exist?

 

 

He does, I heard him cry over DA2

 

Oh Dude mwahahahah low blow   But funny none the less

[DumSheeps]

Spoiler

I enjoy the heck out of duel-wielding as a warrior in DA:O.
Wearing heavy armor and just jabbing at your enemies with fast paced attacks just have this special feeling to it.

It's the type of class that you rarely see in other video games. Trully, how many times did you actually see a heavy armored warrior with two long swords? It's usually same ol' spears, or two handed weapons.

It doesn't hurt anyone to have the option in duel wielding for the warrior class.
I'm not sure why some people complain about briging this subject up. It was a fun build to play. And I looked good.

BioWare, if you're actually not planing to add duel-wielding for warriors, can you please just tell us?
There are many people who loved it, and these debates are not going to stop until we're sure if it'll be back or not.
 

I want to be told straight up too. Its not that big of a deal if Allen or someone else just come and say Yes/No and be done with it.

[Kantr]

it is, because that would mean that the forum would be filled with similar threads