Lat's Talk Threesomes
#51
Posté 02 mai 2014 - 04:08
#52
Posté 02 mai 2014 - 04:23
I'm sure Bioware could write a polygamous relationship, if they were so inclined.
I'm not sure it would read as "equal love" so much as two women being made to share a man who doesn't truly respect them.
#53
Posté 02 mai 2014 - 04:31
*Squees while imagining M!Inquisitor swaggering down the street with both Solas and DHMG under his arms*
To be honest, I probably wouldn't go with it, but polygamy would certainly be an interesting option.
- UltimateGohanSS aime ceci
#54
Posté 02 mai 2014 - 04:55
#55
Posté 02 mai 2014 - 09:11
I'm fine with the concept of polyamorous relationships, where all 3 people in the relationship have feelings for each other.
I wouldn't like it if they did it like Jade Empire, where the male character is basically starting up a harem or something. Silk Fox and Dawn Star weren't interested in each other, only the male PC.
#56
Guest_Cat Blade_*
Posté 02 mai 2014 - 10:07
Guest_Cat Blade_*
I can't help but saying: I do not understand players' obsession with threesomes in these games. I'd rather see companions get jealous and dump the PC, take him/her back, and dump him/her again, bouncing around from relationship to relationship (then he/she just ends up alone) like most desperate idiots tend to do in real life. lol
- Ispan et Felya87 aiment ceci
#57
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 03:41
#58
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 07:40
In Origins, there was a way to have both Leliana and Morrigan be in a relationship with you at the same time.
Leliana: "The Maker teaches us to share our blessings." is still one of the funniest lines of all time involving LIs.
What about Morrigan and Zevran? Cause, hot.
Anyway... I support a three-way relationship. I don't see the problem with it. My male Inquisitor, Solas and Dorian would make for one hell of a sexy time.
#59
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 10:51
What about Morrigan and Zevran? Cause, hot.
Anyway... I support a three-way relationship. I don't see the problem with it. My male Inquisitor, Solas and Dorian would make for one hell of a sexy time.
I can already see the fanfiction.
Oh god, your avatar.
#60
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 11:02
About Leliana and Morrigan romance at the sime time it is a bug well even not bug simple using holes in game mechanic because devs didn't think to prevent possibilities start romance for second or even third time after you broke up with character.It is clear that non of 4 Li's won't accept another niether leiana or morrigan wanted to share you can even propose that for morrigan she won't be pleased and she say that leliana won't be neither.
So in the end you use gameplay mechanic that allows you start romance again for example you can tell leliana that you see her as nothing more than girl that carries equipment she won't react good on that then you can start romance over again because you asked about marjolene...
#61
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 01:51
I'd be okay with this so long as it wasn't fan-servicey. If the PC enters into a polyamorous relationship with two other characters, that means they should also be able to take other lovers.
#62
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 01:54
Not necessarily. You could be in a committed relationship; it would just be with two people instead of one.
- ladyoflate aime ceci
#63
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 01:56
Jesus wept.
#64
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 02:01
- Eveangaline aime ceci
#65
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 02:04
They would be crucified by the fandom. Also, that's not really a threesome. (...Unless they invited you along?)
#66
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 02:06
Not necessarily. You could be in a committed relationship; it would just be with two people instead of one.
Sure.
But what people are really asking for here is the ability of the player character to romance two characters and not have to choose between them. Meanwhile, those two characters must be exclusive to the player character. Its not so much that the players think a polyamorous relationship in the series would be interesting, so much as they just want their player character to be able to have threesomes with two women.
For that reason I don't think Bioware should go that route. If they do however, it should come with the consequences of the two characters in question agreeing to a polyamorous arrangement with the caveat that they won't be exclusive to the player character.
#67
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 02:10
Of course there'll be a threesome. It's just that pc unintentionally introduced their li to their true soul mate, they fell in love then ditched you afterwards.They would be crucified by the fandom. Also, that's not really a threesome. (...Unless they invited you along?)
Think of the lulz.
#68
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 02:11
Ah. That's not really what this thread is supposed to be about, but I can see what you mean. Yes, that's a reasonable caveat. Like if you wanted to romance both Isabella and Merrill in II, then Isabella could still have her sex friends thing with Fenris. As long as everyone knew what they were getting into I could see that being okay, too.
#69
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 02:31
DHMG is enough for me. Quite interested in Leliana. She was my LI in Origins. Oh, didn't mention that I also romanced Morrigan too.
#70
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 02:52
I can do without threesomes. My Inquisitor will already have his hands full with Cassandra anyway ![]()
#71
Posté 03 mai 2014 - 04:59
Sure.
But what people are really asking for here is the ability of the player character to romance two characters and not have to choose between them. Meanwhile, those two characters must be exclusive to the player character. Its not so much that the players think a polyamorous relationship in the series would be interesting, so much as they just want their player character to be able to have threesomes with two women.
For that reason I don't think Bioware should go that route. If they do however, it should come with the consequences of the two characters in question agreeing to a polyamorous arrangement with the caveat that they won't be exclusive to the player character.
Mm, most of the thread has been talking about a three-person committed relationship, with occasional interjections from people going 'threesome are so HAWT' that have been ignored, so I don't really know where you're getting this from.
I like the idea of being able to have an explicitly open relationship with an LI, as opposed to simply implied as in the cases of Isabela and Zevran because all open relationships should be discussed beforehand (otherwise it's cheating. If it's under the table and not agreed to by your partner, it's cheating. You're not polyamorous, you're just an *******.) and I'd like to actually see that on-screen in-game. I don't know, ironically, if I'd want to see that conversation coming from the first explicit triad setup.
#72
Posté 14 mai 2014 - 04:53
Instead of a threesome, perhaps DA:I will turn it all on its head and make you an NPC's love interest, forcing you to fawn and flutter around them for a change.
#73
Posté 14 mai 2014 - 05:01
You can end origins with both zevran and alistair being romanced. (It's how I assume an heir to the throne gets produced if you're queen)
#74
Posté 14 mai 2014 - 06:49
I don't see why it would be impossible. I doubt they'll ever do a truly polyamorous relationship, but if they did it right, I'd welcome it.
#75
Posté 14 mai 2014 - 06:52
Instead of a threesome, perhaps DA:I will turn it all on its head and make you an NPC's love interest, forcing you to fawn and flutter around them for a change.
?
That's pretty much what you had to do in DAO. That's not a change. That's the usual.





Retour en haut







