Yes.
Yes, if they belong to a certain Bering x Wells
lol these are good ones!
But, I mean something else.
> sex with your hand
Now this thread is too gross...
Yes.
Yes, if they belong to a certain Bering x Wells
lol these are good ones!
But, I mean something else.
> sex with your hand
Now this thread is too gross...
Normal is overrated. But just for the sake of the argument.
I know a couple of gay people who raise children, are married and live a happy life. I also know a few psychopaths who most of the time murdered their wife and lots of other females. They happen to be straight most of the time.
Now you tell me who is normal.
Guest_JujuSamedi_*
Fan of MLP here, enough with the references to it. The point is there is no concept of normal, no need to throw every fan of MLP under one umbrella with a negative context to it. Surprise, even fans of a show can be fans of differing degrees.
The comment was giving an example of how stupid it is to make a sweeping generalization on his part. The use of the world "normal" on his part made a few wrong implications. Of course not everyone in the MLP fandom is weird it is just when you end up making such assumptions in the public, people in the public have a right to call you out for it. The comment was giving an example of how flawed his logic is.
lol these are good ones!
But, I mean something else.
> pony with your hand
Now this thread is too gross...
Oh really, you don't say.
And yes! I edited it.
Fyi I am one of the only bronies that doesn't participate in clopping and I am hardley a brony as it is.
I don't mean to offend but I am very biased on these types of discussion as have religious and political views on gays/lesbians. You can think whatever you want about me, it doesn't change my opinion on religions/politics.
Don't hide you bigoted views on the guise of politics.
Well since you really want to know, I am a republican and most republicans hate gays tbf.
Lol, I have nothing against you. But hating gays -because- you're a republican is kind of... sheepish. Anyway, I'm not here to pick a fight. Anyone can think what they want to, as long as they don't go taking away rights because they find something abnormal/disgusting.
Just seems rediculous to me. I hate endive stalks, but I'm not gonna forbid you to eat those eh?
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Normal as in straight as an arrow.
More like, "As coiled as a slinky" amirite?
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by Derpy Hooves. View it anyway?feels good
So that's what ignore does? Neat little thing.
Well, since there are so many terms for sexuality nowadays, I'm not exactly sure what I'd be classified as; I'm only romantically attracted to guys, but sexually&romantically attracted to women. I usually just call myself bisexual if I ever refer to my sexuality just so I don't confuse people.
Don't have any interesting stories to tell as I haven't told anyone IRL about my sexuality, except my older sister and brother. Living where I live isn't exactly the best place to be a non-hetero woman.
So to answer the actual question, yes.
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Well what started as a joke turned into a war, some just don't seem to take simple opinions these days, guess thats the BSN for you.
Ideally tho, all your jokes fall flat.
Normal is to fit the norms of the one saying it.
Normal to me is pretty damn broad, but it doesn't include everyone. Normal to someone else might instead include everyone. Normal to someone else might instead be a very narrow definition.
Arguing about normal is subjective. Arguing about natural is semantics. Arguing about moral is contentious. Arguing about ethical is personal.
~~~
Anyway, I'm homosexual, out for I guess a decade now since my teens and had minimal problems with it. If you imagine the scale, I might be a 8-9/10, where maybe specific women might be for me, but I haven't really seen it yet. I don't hate the concept, and if I lived in a culture that forced me to do it, I'd do it (at least when my values for freedom and justice aren't factored in), but there wouldn't be any actual inclination.
~~~
Homoerotic asexual is pretty understandable to me.
Homoerotic - finds same gender to be erotic
Asexual - does not find sex with that same gender to be attractive
= can fall in love with same gender, may fantasize about them in erotic (which may simply mean heavy romance) ways, but not anything that might constitute the act of 'sex'. The drive is either not there, or is minimal, or there is an element of active repulsion towards the concept.
~~~
I'm pretty easygoing, and while I'm not really in the 'community', I've been in my relationship for 3 years happily (in a kind of 'not open but not closed' agreed rules), and really enjoy the spectrum of attractions that exist, as long as people aren't all annoying about it (on either 'side').
No, nate, you are the joke
I just blocked Derpy. Hooray!!
Well what started as a joke turned into a war, some just don't seem to take simple opinions these days, guess thats the BSN for you.
Uhm, i've really tried to find the bolded part but i suppose it either doesn't exist or i'm not enough of an ass to see it
Nope.
Well, since there are so many terms for sexuality nowadays, I'm not exactly sure what I'd be classified as; I'm only romantically attracted to guys, but sexually&romantically attracted to women. I usually just call myself bisexual if I ever refer to my sexuality just so I don't confuse people.
This is actually an exact description of my sexuality as well and how I feel towards the whole thing. I just don't care at all for labels ![]()
Well since you really want to know, I am a republican and most republicans hate gays tbf.
So you don't have your own beliefs, is that what you're stating? That's fine, everyone goes through their own experiences and develop their own mindset towards certain aspects of life, but don't state one thing as "normal", when the route of it is - the person is still human and so are you.