156 réponses à ce sujet

[Laamaa]

Mmm, I knew I was gay when I drooled over all the female actresses in movies :') No, but seriously, I emember even as a six year old, when I was watching Zorro, I was very fascinated by the woman ;D (I already forgot her name but meh).

 

Also of course, because I didn't find any attraction towards any men that were hitting on me whatsoever :/ 

[Sir DeLoria]

 
Everyone else BSN when did you know you where straight, LGBT or asexual??

Well, I've always been attracted to girls and at times had more female than male friends.

However I can't count how often guys have called me gay due to my sometimes camp straight behavior. I just enjoy a lot of hobbies and activities that are normally associated with women, I love cooking, art, literature, fashion and I work in modeling. Sports are my life, but I don't like watching matches on tv (imo sports are boring if you're not playing yourself) and apparently that alone counts as "un-manly" these days.

[TheRealJayDee]

I'm a straight guy, only ever been with women and can't exactly imagine being sexually attracted to men. I have to say, though, that I do find certain men quite attractive, in, you know, a non-sexual way. Like with my (not-so-)secret (sort-of-)crush on Neil Patrick Harris. 

[LPPrince]

I'm a straight guy, only ever been with women and can't exactly imagine being sexually attracted to men. I have to say, though, that I do find certain men quite attractive, in, you know, a non-sexual way. Like with my (not-so-)secret (sort-of-)crush on Neil Patrick Harris. 

 

Its okay to recognize someone of the same sex as an attractive individual even though you have no sexual attraction to them. Its natural perception of the World around you using your senses, in this case sight.

 

I recall a time when a friend of mine was talking to me about how I look in the eyes of other people, and he claimed I was a pretty good looking dude. Coming from a friend, another heterosexual guy, that was a hell of a compliment.

[ObserverStatus]

nor·mal [nawr-muhl]

adjective 1. conforming to the standard or the common type;

Homosexuality is not the common orientation, heteroseuality is, therefore using the "normal" adjective for it is completely correct.

I can't even begin to undestand why some people get ridiculously offended by it.

Calling one trait "normal" exclusion of other, less common traits, implies that they are abnormal, but nothing could be further from the the truth. In any viable population of any organism, variation within the species is what we would call "normal."

[geth47]

Well, so I guess being left-handed (my case), since is also observed in a very small minority, is abnormal too. 

[geth47]

But I do agree, that homosexuality is indeed something outside the common and expected parameters, since the rule for procreation is heterosexuality. 

[geth47]

Yes, I agree, but remember, you are dealing with a sensitive topic, on a public forum that works  under political correctness. People can easily become hyper-sensitive in this matter. Specially if they´re immature and insecure. And trust me, a lot of members on this forum are. Why do you think I have six warnings from the moderation? All because I hurt some feelings with the lgbt and the feminists. All because I said that making everyone on a game bisexual would be degrading to the quality of the game and work against true diversity, and in another topic because I said some men do feel attracted to virgins who lived moral lives, believing they would make better spouses, and that to these men, these women are regarded in a superior level than the ones who slept with half the town. 

[Mr.House]

 

nor·mal [nawr-muhl]

adjective 1. conforming to the standard or the common type;

 

Homosexuality is not the common orientation, heterosexuality is, therefore using the "normal" adjective for it is completely correct.

 

I can't even begin to undestand why some people get ridiculously offended by it.

 

No ones normal because every single person has at least something that is not common. You have just admitted you're not normal just like everyone else.

 

inb4 the "you're cherry picking" argument.

[CrazyRah]

A homoromantic asexual? What the hell is that?

 

Can it be eaten with cake?

 

I got no idea and i ask the same question, does it go well with strawberry cake?

[Dio Demon]

No ones normal because every single person has at least something that is not common. You have just admitted you're not normal just like everyone else.

 

inb4 the "you're cherry picking" argument.

I have to admit House your profile picture suits this reply.

[Sir DeLoria]

And in another topic because I said some men do feel attracted to virgins who lived moral lives, believing they would make better spouses, and that to these men, these women are regarded in a superior level than the ones who slept with half the town.

It's called the Madonna-wh*re complex, a woman is either a virgin saint or a sl*t. This is a psychological disorder, that Sigmund Freud already discovered in certain men. Equating morality with sexuality is a fallacy in itself that can make it hard for women to create a sexual identity outside of these two ridiculous extremes. So I'd say a hefty response from said women is entirely justified.

[geth47]

Well, heterosexuality is the normative attraction. There´s no escape from this reality.

 

It is the normative biological rule for the human being, since it´s by procreation with the opposite sex that the species is perpetuated. 

 

So yes, he has a point. 

[Mr.House]

I have to admit House your profile picture suits this reply.

Sleepy Yukari is just that awesome.

[geth47]

It´s no madonna complex, it´s simply to have standards. People can take issue, try to label men as sick persons or whatever, but several men will keep on considering women who are virtuous and chaste as superior to women who are amoral, and considering amoral women who had several partners as degraded. 

 

It´s easier, however, to be defensive and label the other side as sick. The lgbt agenda does the same whenever they face any kind of opposition, and simply use the term "homophobia".

[Mr.House]

Well, heterosexuality is the normative attraction. There´s no escape from this reality.

 

It is the normative biological rule for the human being, since it´s by procreation with the opposite sex that the species is perpetuated. 

 

So yes, he has a point. 

Just because you are straight does not make you normal, this is not hard to understand. It's not like I'm talking about PI here.

[Mr.House]

It´s no madonna complex, it´s simply to have standards. People can take issue, try to label men as sick persons or whatever, but several men will keep on considering women who are virtuous and chaste as superior to women who are amoral, and considering amoral women who had several partners as degraded. 

 

It´s easier, however, to be defensive and label the other side as sick. The lgbt agenda does the same whenever they face any kind of opposition, and simply use the term "homophobia".

...Which is the Madonna Complex, this is basic psychology.