Is there anything which doesn't provoke a condescending scoff from you?Xkcd is far overrated. The only satisfaction is from 'getting' the joke and smiling sightly to yourself because you know enough to understand it. The jokes themselves aren't funny. At all. It's also pretentious.
SMBC is way more insightful and actually funny.
Writing failures in the Rannoch arc (by AssaultSloth)
#851
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:11
#852
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:13
Putting David on ignore seems like a fruitless exercise. He always pisses off enough people to get quoted. ![]()
- MassivelyEffective0730 et ImaginaryMatter aiment ceci
#853
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:14
Given I seldom assault people with gaming memes in my daily life, that's a 'downside' I can deal with. ![]()
#854
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:14
Xkcd is far overrated. The only satisfaction is from 'getting' the joke and smiling sightly to yourself because you know enough to understand it. The jokes themselves aren't funny. At all. It's also pretentious.
SMBC is way more insightful and actually funny.
You're criticizing something for being pretentious?
*scoffs mockingly at the mocking scoff*
- DeinonSlayer aime ceci
#855
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:15
I did just say SMBC is way more insightful and actually funny.
#856
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:22
Putting David on ignore seems like a fruitless exercise. He always pisses off enough people to get quoted.
There's no point to doing it. You also get to miss out on the priceless gems that make the BSN worth coming to.
#857
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:23
Wait wait, before anyone quotes the latest post let me apply my David Mad Libz.
That is a completely ______ statement. What absolutely _________ drivel. Do people actually think that ________ means ________? That is ___________. But I suppose it should be expected from ___________ that ___________.
How close was I?
- DeinonSlayer, MassivelyEffective0730 et ImaginaryMatter aiment ceci
#858
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:32
Xkcd is far overrated. The only satisfaction is from 'getting' the joke and smiling sightly to yourself because you know enough to understand it. The jokes themselves aren't funny. At all. It's also pretentious.
SMBC is way more insightful and actually funny.

- ImaginaryMatter aime ceci
#859
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:36
SMBC is way more insightful and actually funny.
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council?
#860
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:42
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council?
Stockport - now there's a dump. Quality viaduct though.
#861
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:43
For those of you interested in the direction the geth/quarian conflict might have taken if L'Etoile had stayed on here's something he posted awhile back.
I agree that the Reapers should require a bit more to bring them down. During ME2's production, I had a vision of an ME3 scene in which the quarians have to ram a Liveship into one to cripple or kill it. The only thing that would have saved the quarian fleet from destruction was the geth using a wormhole to jump in one of their great works - if not the actual Dyson Shell, then a Matrioska Brain. It throws back the Reapers by chucking black holes at them - biotic-style Singularities on a massive scale.
Some interesting implications in there.
#862
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:50
That does not sound like a good idea at all.
In fact, it sounds like a pretty damn horrible idea.
#863
Guest_Jesus Christ_*
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:53
Guest_Jesus Christ_*
That does not sound like a good idea at all.
Of course not, how could it be? You didn't think of it, so it must be bad, O great Bob.
- MassivelyEffective0730 et ImaginaryMatter aiment ceci
#864
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 06:56
That does not sound like a good idea at all.
In fact, it sounds like a pretty damn horrible idea.
The whole notion of the Geth building stellar megastructures was a terrible idea, with no basis in any sort of plausible reality. I shudder at the math, but they would need the complete mass of an incredible amount of star systems to build the thing.
#865
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:00
The whole notion of the Geth building stellar megastructures was a terrible idea, with no basis in any sort of plausible reality. I shudder at the math, but they would need the complete mass of an incredible amount of star systems to build the thing.
Ridiculous.
Is this the same reasoning that concludes blast effects are 'irrelevant' based on Siberia having life? You're pulling numbers out of your ass and calling it science and 'plausible reality.' You have no idea to the extent of the density of the platforms.
Try using some actual evidence next time. Then maybe you can talk about 'plausible reality.'
#866
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:03
Ridiculous.
Is this the same reasoning that concludes blast effects are 'irrelevant' based on Siberia having life? You're pulling numbers out of your ass and calling it science and 'plausible reality.' You have no idea to the extent of the density of the platforms.
Here's a snippet from wikipedia.
Also if assuming a radius of one AU, then there may not be sufficient building material in the Solar System to construct a Dyson shell. Anders Sandberg estimates that there is 1.82×1026 kg of easily usable building material in the Solar System, enough for a 1-AU shell with a mass of 600 kg/m²—about 8–20 cm thick on average, depending on the density of the material. This includes the hard-to-access cores of the gas giants; the inner planets alone provide only 11.79×1024 kg, enough for a 1-AU shell with a mass of just 42 kg/m².
I did overstate it somewhat, but still the engineering problems are outside the scope and the time of the MEU. And this is for a very thin shell. If the Geth were building a 'Dyson Swarm' then the plausibility edges closer to reality.
#867
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:05
That's for a Dyson Shell. i'm nearly certain it's said point-blank the geth are constructioning a series of platforms. Or a 'swarm,' as you call it.
#868
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:07
That's for a Dyson Shell. i'm nearly certain it's said point-blank the geth are constructioning a series of platforms. Or a 'swarm,' as you call it.
I don't recall any details on the matter, does anyone have a codex or in game statement?
#869
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:07
Prepare for Davidian scoff in 3....2....1...
- ImaginaryMatter aime ceci
#870
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:08
The description of it in the galaxy map in ME3. It's a dyson bubble configuration.I don't recall any details on the matter, does anyone have a codex or in game statement?
Need a scoff jar or something.Prepare for Davidian scoff in 3....2....1...
#871
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:09
If L'Etoile's idea of a 'Matrioska Brain' was ever included however then I will safely assert that for Type I civilizations that all the MEU races (save the Reapers) represent it would be completely impossible. A Matrioska Brain is an AU-wide double-hulled Dyson Shell.
#872
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:10
"Close to the star, the Normandy's scanner can detect a nigh-uncountable number of geth statites -- satellites that use solar sails to self-correct their position. The geth placed the ultra-lightweight constructions around the sun to collect energy, arranged in a vast array known as a Dyson bubble. Scattered among them are space stations and servers that draw power from the statites through wireless energy transfer. Most of the space stations are wreckage now, and no small number of solar sails have also been destroyed. It appears the quarians began to destroy them but were stopped before the attack was complete."
#873
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:11
The description of it in the galaxy map in ME3. It's a dyson bubble configuration.
Need a scoff jar or something.
Edited as David posted in-game text on it.
I think their choice of 'Bubble' is misleading. That would imply a single construct. 'Swarm' is the more accepted term that I've come across.
#874
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:18
I'm Bob. From Accounting.
Back to the relevant issue. Despite L'Etoile apparently being the current darling writer of this section of the forum, the idea is terrible. God awful.
#875
Posté 22 mai 2014 - 07:31
I admit a Jupiter Brain would have been more reasonable, and are speculated to actually exist in the ME-verse





Retour en haut





