Will Haestrom's sun isolate Rannoch from the rest of the galaxy?
#1
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 09:35
It occurred to me that, in ME3, the Far Rim is the first system we get to en rout to Rannoch. This would suggest that the relay in Haestrom's star system is a primary relay, while the relay in the Tikkun system is a secondary relay (like how the Charon Relay is a secondary relay leading to Arcturus - you can fly from Sol to Arcturus in three days with conventional FTL). You have to pass through Haestrom's solar system, whose star is rapidly dying, to get back out to the wider galaxy.
When Haestrom's sun goes supernova, will the loss of the relay cut off Rannoch from the wider galaxy until the Dholen relay (like the Mu relay before it) is rediscovered after the planetary nebula cools, thousands of years later?
Maybe Tali's mission to Haestrom in ME2 wasn't so pointless after all...
#2
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 09:56
Or, maybe, it's how Bioware intends to remove the Quarians and Geth from the next Mass effect series.
They were only interesting as long as they served to create a synthetic vs organic conflict to support the Catalysts claim... After that they are no longer needed. (In the writers opinion, maybe?)
#3
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 09:59
All to provide us with new enemies and species with ethical problems.
#4
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 10:24
You are aware that supernovas are relatively rare events? That nowhere close to every star dies with a supernova?
#5
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 10:29
Yes. Our sun will expand to a red giant and blow off its outer layers in a planetary nebula, leaving a white dwarf at its core (now here comes the accusation that I had to look that up).You are aware that supernovas are relatively rare events? That nowhere close to every star dies with a supernova?
You are aware that going supernova is exactly what they said Haestrom's sun was expected to do? "All for information about stars blowing up..."
#6
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 10:39
No, I think 'blowing up' could easily just mean the star swelling. And besides, it's a very casual context. Looking at the codex, it does say Haestorm's sun is likely to turn into a red giant. Which don't normally supernova.
In any case, it's unclear if whatever process is accelerating its aging would continue once the hydrogen is used up. It very well might not, in which case the process would be on the magnitude of a billion years or so.
#7
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 10:42
The whole Haestrom thing was part of the dark energy plot.
Tali mentions it in one of those audiologs.
#8
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 10:47
Keep in mind, a secondary relay can link to any other relay over short distance. And there always can be another primary relay not far from Rannoch system we just didn't happen to learn about in-game.
The question is, is there any other primary relay near of Rannoch's secondary one? If there is, then no worries ![]()
But I guess, a sun going supernova is hella dangerous itself, even for life in another system.
#9
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 10:48
It's true that the mechanism is unknown. Hydrostatic equilibrium is being disrupted. The degree to which matter in the star's core is being compressed is unknown, but the fusion reaction would have to be accelerated to start blowing off outer layers, which means core mass has increased significantly. This may be like what happened to Jupiter in Clarke's "2010," with matter in the core being compressed beyond what would occur naturally, progressing beyond the mass at which a white dwarf would be formed and towards neutron star density.No, I think 'blowing up' could easily just mean the star swelling. And besides, it's a very casual context. Looking at the codex, it does say Haestorm's sun is likely to turn into a red giant. Which don't normally supernova.
In any case, it's unclear if whatever process is accelerating its aging would continue once the hydrogen is used up. It very well might not, in which case the process would be on the magnitude of a billion years or so.
#10
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 10:55
Wowie Kazowie, there's some five-dollar words being thrown around in this thread. 'Hydrostatic equilibrium,' huh?
#11
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 11:29
Wowie Kazowie, there's some five-dollar words being thrown around in this thread. 'Hydrostatic equilibrium,' huh?
Not sure what the big deal is with this phrase, since there's a hydrostatic equilibrium between the layers of stars.
#12
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 11:41
Good band name.
#13
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 12:07
Wowie Kazowie, there's some five-dollar words being thrown around in this thread. 'Hydrostatic equilibrium,' huh?
Have you never taken an astronomy class? Hell, have you never watched Cosmos? They explain what it is and its relevance to gravity. Granted, I'd argue about it's usage in stellar mechanics, but there is a fluid concept to the ionized radiation being emitted by the star that is counterbalanced by gravity. All the while, the pressure and heat is what is causing fusion and making heavier elements. The in's pushing out and the out's pushing in. If the in win's, you get the red giant that Sol will become in about 5 billion years, and the star will cast off its layers leaving the dense, superhot core (a white dwarf). If the out wins, depending on the mass of the star, you'll either have the pressure on the core be so great that the individual nucleus' of the atoms in the core will be compacted against each other tightly and the release from that will cause a massive supernova (or possibly a hypernova), or the mass is so great that the gravity is practically unstoppable and you get an object with infinite mass, with such a powerful gravitational pull that not even light can escape, thus making a black hole, and the surface and image of the object is invisible.
It's a big word. That doesn't mean that since you don't know it, it's fake. And I thought I'd give you a little crash course in high mass stellar death cycles. Teach you some real science.
#14
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 12:09
Have you never taken an astronomy class? Hell, have you never watched Cosmos?
Bro, do you even Sagan?
- DeinonSlayer, MassivelyEffective0730 et Cknarf aiment ceci
#15
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 12:20
Bro, do you even Sagan?
I do. I do Sagan. And I put Neil deGrasse Tyson on my beats. Pop 'n' fresh money.
- DeinonSlayer aime ceci
#16
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 02:50
#17
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 03:36
#18
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 05:35
The main point is that the relay system shown on the galaxy map is only a tiny fraction of the actual number of relays, so perhaps they can always take the ringroad
The simple answer is, if the writers decide to advance the plot and keep the quarians in existance, it will be either cut off, or it won't.
#19
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 05:55
- Aimi aime ceci
#20
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 06:23
Oh. Right. Duh.Anyway, there shouldn't be a problem with finding the Haestrom relay after the nova. When you send a ship through from the other side you'll know where the relay is. The problem with the Mu relay was that there wasn't anybody on the other side.
Guess it just boils down to how long it'll take, post-nova, for the system to be safe to enter again. Unless the secondary relay to Rannoch and the primary relay to the wider galaxy travel in significantly different directions.
#21
Posté 04 mai 2014 - 08:09
Haestrom's sun doesn't seem to be of a mass large enough to go super nova. Forget what Tali said about "stars blowing up and all...." Stellar mass is going to rule all here. In fact it is in the wikia that Haestrom's sun is aging prematurely and will enter the red giant stage. It should behave no differently than our sun since Dholen is one solar mass. Mass relays seem to be typically around the orbit of Pluto in distance from their stars (about 29 AU). Dholen, like our sun, might expand to 2 AU (about the orbit of Mars). We don't have to worry about anything like a black hole or anything catastrophic. The mass relay in that system should remain safe.
#22
Posté 05 mai 2014 - 02:53
#23
Posté 05 mai 2014 - 02:58
- Excella Gionne aime ceci
#24
Posté 05 mai 2014 - 03:02
#25
Posté 05 mai 2014 - 03:16





Retour en haut







