226 réponses à ce sujet

[SerCambria358]

They only die in one hit If you don't invest in constitution, when I level up I usually spend one point on willpower, one on magic and one on constitution. Sure I can't react higher lvl spells fast but it's the price I pay to survive more the a couple hits.

The point of what I said is that the hole in a mages strategy is when they're confronted, that weakness is gone when you have heavy armor as well as spells

[Crunchycarp]

The point of what I said is that the hole in a mages strategy is when they're confronted, that weakness is gone when you have heavy armor as well as spells

You would have to spend a lot of points in willpower to make a heavy armored Mage successful in spell casting.

[SerCambria358]

You would have to spend a lot of points in willpower to make a heavy armored Mage successful in spell casting.

I see no issues with that

[KainD]

Why use haste when you can take the hit and spend that energy on killing them. You can't haste out of every bad situation, it's more practical to use armor. And yes mages do stay stationary most of the time, there's no need to move beyond an opponent coming towards them.

Back and forth argument - why waste energy on carrying armor, when you can use that energy for a haste spell? And Imo it's better to not get hit.

[SerCambria358]

Back and forth argument - why waste energy on carrying armor, when you can use that energy for a haste spell? And Imo it's better to not get hit.

It doesn't matter which one is preferred, facts show that they're both useful which supports my point and contradicts yours

[Pateu]

Knight enchanter is the most silly specialization for a mage to have. If I wanted to play a warrior I would play that instead. 

 

Arcane Warriors didn't feel like warriors at all.

[The Elder King]

I think people aRe forgetting that a mage PC will likely be able to use heavy armour regardless of the specialization he would choose.
From the description KE seems to use magical abilities to improve his defense and use a type of magical blades. Considering that weapon restriction for the classes are still present in DAI i don't think KE will be able to use actual swords.

[mikeymoonshine]

I never actually used arcane warrior but I did have a bloodmage tank Hawke in a DA2 playthrough and that was interesting.. My first mage will most likely be a necromancer and unless rift mage sucks I will probably go for that one next but I may try knight enchanter too depending on how it turns out. 

 

I think people aRe forgetting that a mage PC will likely be able to use heavy armour regardless of the specialization he would choose.
From the description KE seems to use magical abilities to improve his defense and use a type of magical blades. Considering that weapon restriction for the classes are still present in DAI i don't think KE will be able to use actual swords.

 

I suppose it's possible that the spec will give the mage the option to use a real sword but anyway yes, I agree.  We already know we can wear whatever Armour we like and the description sounded like a magical swords/defense spells thing to me.

[KainD]

And?



Some of us like being force sensitive.

You know that force users can also deflect without a lightsaber right?

[KainD]

It doesn't matter which one is preferred, facts show that they're both useful which supports my point and contradicts yours

No but one is clearly more useful, as the saved energy can be used for any spell, making you more versatile.

[KainD]

Arcane Warriors didn't feel like warriors at all.

FELT like bs, even though the numbers were good.

[SerCambria358]

No but one is clearly more useful, as the saved energy can be used for any spell, making you more versatile.

Not at all, one is more useful for one scenario, the other is more useful in another. Its like you have a vendetta against anyone who's not a mage, refusing to admit anything despite lore, gameplay, and other players telling you otherwise. Just a textbook case of denial

[AresKeith]

No but one is clearly more useful, as the saved energy can be used for any spell, making you more versatile.

 

Just accept that people prefer a different style, geez

[SerCambria358]

How can anyone have a vendetta against anyone not a mage.. it'd be pretty self-hating.

 

Y'know... because magic isn't, like, real. And you're pretty much forced to appreciate physical prowess to some extent in reality.

Not this person, anything that isnt magic is labelled as pointless

[EkhidnaDrakaina]

The problem with Knight Enchanter I potentially see, is that you'll never be as good as the classes designed to fight in melee. It spreads you thinner, making you an okay caster and an okay melee fighter.

[mikeymoonshine]

The problem with Knight Enchanter I potentially see, is that you'll never be as good as the classes designed to fight in melee. It spreads you thinner, making you an okay caster and an okay melee fighter.

 

That could happen but I guess it really depends on how it turns out. Being able to take more damage might make up for your spells being less powerful. 

[Cainhurst Crow]

You know that force users can also deflect without a lightsaber right?

 

You know only a few masters of the force can do that and its easier/cooler to use the saber right?

[Cainhurst Crow]

The problem with Knight Enchanter I potentially see, is that you'll never be as good as the classes designed to fight in melee. It spreads you thinner, making you an okay caster and an okay melee fighter.

 

I don't see knight enchanter as needing to out preform warriors or rogues in melee. Knight Enchanters could be bringing a jack of all trades type class into DA, where that you are okay as a skilled in all fronts but a master in none, not that bad a thing if you're looking to make a versatile character. Additionally, we don't know what these arcane armaments do, so they give an edge in combat that puts them up on par, or might do something completely different to make knight enchanter appealing, like drain mana from enemies with every blow made.

 

Theres not enough here to claim it as the best or worst classes, nor enough to call it garbage or god-tier. We just do not have enough to make a call at this time.

[The Baconer]

The problem with Knight Enchanter I potentially see, is that you'll never be as good as the classes designed to fight in melee.

 

Why not?