Aller au contenu

Photo

The 18 most suppressed inventions ever


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
9 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Eddo36

Eddo36
  • Members
  • 1 491 messages

https://usahitman.com/18msie/

 

A couple of far-fetched ones on the list, but most seem legit.



#2
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

Those darn lobbyist never let us advance!



#3
Eddo36

Eddo36
  • Members
  • 1 491 messages

Unless they can make a buck from it.



#4
metatheurgist

metatheurgist
  • Members
  • 2 429 messages

A lot of those are bunk, but it is a fact that while business talks a good talk about innovation and competition it all comes a far second to maximising profit and maintaining the status quo.


  • NekkidNones aime ceci

#5
NekkidNones

NekkidNones
  • Members
  • 994 messages

Open at your own risk.

 

Spoiler


#6
Gravisanimi

Gravisanimi
  • Members
  • 10 081 messages

The overunity generator is true.

 

According to the several letters I sent to companies to fund the products research, a self-propelled electromagnetic generator "wouldn't be viable with today's technology".

 

Yeah, the same technology that I based off those flashlights that you shake to charge the battery.

 

Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned that in the case of a rupture, it would become a MAC, and even if it didn't break it would create enough of a magnetic field oscillation that it might ignite the atmosphere, but those risks must be mentioned.



#7
Eddo36

Eddo36
  • Members
  • 1 491 messages

Actually on the overunity generator, can higher energy output come from lower energy input? Current physics says no.



#8
mybudgee

mybudgee
  • Members
  • 23 037 messages
MoonSpot, you are a very unique person aren't you?

#9
Volus Warlord

Volus Warlord
  • Members
  • 10 697 messages

https://usahitman.com/18msie/

 

A couple of far-fetched ones on the list, but most seem legit.

 

 

I haven't seen so much bullshit in the same page since the last presidential election. 



#10
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

In a TV program a Solar Energy scientist said that Solar Plants (at their best) are just twice as expensive as Coal Plants to produce the same amount of energy. But because of this they're not popular and widely used.

 

Any comment on this?